机构餐饮服务基准:美国管理人员的态度和做法的调查

Saunya N. Bright, Junehee Kwon, Carolyn Bednar, Julia Newcomer
{"title":"机构餐饮服务基准:美国管理人员的态度和做法的调查","authors":"Saunya N. Bright,&nbsp;Junehee Kwon,&nbsp;Carolyn Bednar,&nbsp;Julia Newcomer","doi":"10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Benchmarking is an ongoing process that gathers information to evaluate the best practices and improve performance. Despite possible changes and benefits, research reporting current foodservice benchmarking is limited. A nationwide survey of foodservice administrators was conducted to determine current practices and administrators' attitudes toward benchmarking. A questionnaire was developed, validated by experts and pilot-tested. Randomly selected, 600 foodservice administrators from health-care, school, correctional and university facilities received questionnaires, and 121 provided usable data (20%). Food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, and percent customer satisfaction with service were the three most used measures. Benchmarking was regarded as important in performing most respondents' jobs (61%), but fewer indicated their benchmarking knowledge as being above average (48%). For training, 41% indicated needs for training on ways to collaborate with benchmarking partners. The majority preferred training through professional association meetings (70%) and Internet-based training (69%). Results indicate opportunities for benchmarking training preferably through meetings and Internet.</p>","PeriodicalId":100783,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Foodservice","volume":"20 3","pages":"123-132"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-06-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional foodservice benchmarking: survey of administrators' attitudes and practices in the USA\",\"authors\":\"Saunya N. Bright,&nbsp;Junehee Kwon,&nbsp;Carolyn Bednar,&nbsp;Julia Newcomer\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Benchmarking is an ongoing process that gathers information to evaluate the best practices and improve performance. Despite possible changes and benefits, research reporting current foodservice benchmarking is limited. A nationwide survey of foodservice administrators was conducted to determine current practices and administrators' attitudes toward benchmarking. A questionnaire was developed, validated by experts and pilot-tested. Randomly selected, 600 foodservice administrators from health-care, school, correctional and university facilities received questionnaires, and 121 provided usable data (20%). Food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, and percent customer satisfaction with service were the three most used measures. Benchmarking was regarded as important in performing most respondents' jobs (61%), but fewer indicated their benchmarking knowledge as being above average (48%). For training, 41% indicated needs for training on ways to collaborate with benchmarking partners. The majority preferred training through professional association meetings (70%) and Internet-based training (69%). Results indicate opportunities for benchmarking training preferably through meetings and Internet.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Foodservice\",\"volume\":\"20 3\",\"pages\":\"123-132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-06-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Foodservice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Foodservice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1748-0159.2009.00133.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

基准测试是一个持续的过程,它收集信息以评估最佳实践并改进性能。尽管可能的变化和好处,研究报告目前的餐饮服务基准是有限的。一项全国范围内的餐饮服务管理人员调查被进行,以确定当前的做法和管理人员对基准的态度。制定了一份调查问卷,经专家验证并进行了试点测试。从卫生保健、学校、惩教所和大学机构随机抽取的600名餐饮服务管理人员收到了问卷,其中121人提供了可用数据(20%)。食品成本百分比、人工成本百分比和顾客服务满意度百分比是最常用的三个衡量标准。大多数受访者(61%)认为标杆管理对他们的工作很重要,但只有少数受访者表示他们的标杆管理知识高于平均水平(48%)。在培训方面,41%的受访者表示需要就如何与标杆合作伙伴进行合作进行培训。大多数人更喜欢通过专业协会会议(70%)和基于互联网的培训(69%)进行培训。结果表明,最好通过会议和互联网进行基准培训。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Institutional foodservice benchmarking: survey of administrators' attitudes and practices in the USA

Benchmarking is an ongoing process that gathers information to evaluate the best practices and improve performance. Despite possible changes and benefits, research reporting current foodservice benchmarking is limited. A nationwide survey of foodservice administrators was conducted to determine current practices and administrators' attitudes toward benchmarking. A questionnaire was developed, validated by experts and pilot-tested. Randomly selected, 600 foodservice administrators from health-care, school, correctional and university facilities received questionnaires, and 121 provided usable data (20%). Food cost percentage, labor cost percentage, and percent customer satisfaction with service were the three most used measures. Benchmarking was regarded as important in performing most respondents' jobs (61%), but fewer indicated their benchmarking knowledge as being above average (48%). For training, 41% indicated needs for training on ways to collaborate with benchmarking partners. The majority preferred training through professional association meetings (70%) and Internet-based training (69%). Results indicate opportunities for benchmarking training preferably through meetings and Internet.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信