减轻经济波动:建立有效的金融市场应取代传统的经济政策

M. Emranul Haque , Paul Middleditch , Shuonan Zhang
{"title":"减轻经济波动:建立有效的金融市场应取代传统的经济政策","authors":"M. Emranul Haque ,&nbsp;Paul Middleditch ,&nbsp;Shuonan Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.jge.2023.100059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The choice of instruments for mitigating economic volatility is a serious consideration for policymakers and important question in government and economics. Using a DSGE model with endogenous technology creation, we show that efficient financial markets are more effective than conventional economic policies, such as fiscal interventions, in reducing economic volatility. Our findings are consistent with data from the Chinese and the US economies who contrast in structure perfectly for the purpose of our comparison. The implication is that rather than focusing on conventional economic policies, a government should help establish efficient financial markets to allow producers a hedge into equity finance during times of financial stress.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100785,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Government and Economics","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100059"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319323000022/pdfft?md5=19539db90563f2d49ada19d981262016&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319323000022-main.pdf","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mitigating economic volatility: When building efficient financial markets should supersede conventional economic policy\",\"authors\":\"M. Emranul Haque ,&nbsp;Paul Middleditch ,&nbsp;Shuonan Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jge.2023.100059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The choice of instruments for mitigating economic volatility is a serious consideration for policymakers and important question in government and economics. Using a DSGE model with endogenous technology creation, we show that efficient financial markets are more effective than conventional economic policies, such as fiscal interventions, in reducing economic volatility. Our findings are consistent with data from the Chinese and the US economies who contrast in structure perfectly for the purpose of our comparison. The implication is that rather than focusing on conventional economic policies, a government should help establish efficient financial markets to allow producers a hedge into equity finance during times of financial stress.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100059\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319323000022/pdfft?md5=19539db90563f2d49ada19d981262016&pid=1-s2.0-S2667319323000022-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Government and Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319323000022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Government and Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667319323000022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

减轻经济波动的工具选择是政策制定者认真考虑的问题,也是政府和经济学的重要问题。利用具有内生技术创造的DSGE模型,我们表明,在减少经济波动方面,有效的金融市场比传统的经济政策(如财政干预)更有效。我们的发现与中国和美国经济的数据是一致的,这两个经济体在结构上完全不同,这是我们比较的目的。其含义是,政府不应专注于传统的经济政策,而应帮助建立有效的金融市场,让生产商在金融压力时期通过股权融资进行对冲。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Mitigating economic volatility: When building efficient financial markets should supersede conventional economic policy

The choice of instruments for mitigating economic volatility is a serious consideration for policymakers and important question in government and economics. Using a DSGE model with endogenous technology creation, we show that efficient financial markets are more effective than conventional economic policies, such as fiscal interventions, in reducing economic volatility. Our findings are consistent with data from the Chinese and the US economies who contrast in structure perfectly for the purpose of our comparison. The implication is that rather than focusing on conventional economic policies, a government should help establish efficient financial markets to allow producers a hedge into equity finance during times of financial stress.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信