英语后缀-ness和-acy的语料库研究:生产力、体裁及其对二语学习的启示

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Ben Naismith, Matthew Kanwit
{"title":"英语后缀-ness和-acy的语料库研究:生产力、体裁及其对二语学习的启示","authors":"Ben Naismith, Matthew Kanwit","doi":"10.37213/CJAL.2021.28995","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite substantial scholarship relating to word structure (Anderson, 2018), for English affixes the relationship between productivity, genre, and second language (L2) learning remains unclear. Analysis of the existing literature reveals that deadjectival noun suffixes (i.e., nouns derived from adjectives such as appropriacy or goodness) have been underexamined. To address this gap, we examine two rival suffixes, -acy and -ness, through the lens of Construction Morphology (Booij, 2010), considering numerous factors which might condition their varying usage. Critically, corpus data in the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the British National Corpus (Davies, 2008-) reveal the importance of considering these affixes’ productivity in relation to genre, since -acy is especially frequent in academic texts, principally within certain social sciences. The implications for learners and teachers of English as a second language are discussed, particularly higher-level learners building communicative competence in academic contexts, along with a preliminary learner corpus comparison of the two variants.","PeriodicalId":43961,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Corpus Study of the English Suffixes -ness and -acy: Productivity, Genre, and Implications for L2 Learning\",\"authors\":\"Ben Naismith, Matthew Kanwit\",\"doi\":\"10.37213/CJAL.2021.28995\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Despite substantial scholarship relating to word structure (Anderson, 2018), for English affixes the relationship between productivity, genre, and second language (L2) learning remains unclear. Analysis of the existing literature reveals that deadjectival noun suffixes (i.e., nouns derived from adjectives such as appropriacy or goodness) have been underexamined. To address this gap, we examine two rival suffixes, -acy and -ness, through the lens of Construction Morphology (Booij, 2010), considering numerous factors which might condition their varying usage. Critically, corpus data in the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the British National Corpus (Davies, 2008-) reveal the importance of considering these affixes’ productivity in relation to genre, since -acy is especially frequent in academic texts, principally within certain social sciences. The implications for learners and teachers of English as a second language are discussed, particularly higher-level learners building communicative competence in academic contexts, along with a preliminary learner corpus comparison of the two variants.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37213/CJAL.2021.28995\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37213/CJAL.2021.28995","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

尽管有大量与单词结构相关的学术研究(Anderson, 2018),但对于英语词缀,生产力、体裁和第二语言(L2)学习之间的关系仍不清楚。通过对已有文献的分析,我们发现对形容词的宾语后缀(即由形容词(如appropriacy或goodness)衍生而来的名词)的研究不够充分。为了解决这一差距,我们通过构造形态学(Booij, 2010)的视角研究了两个对立的后缀-acy和-ness,并考虑了可能影响其不同用法的众多因素。重要的是,当代美国英语语料库和英国国家语料库中的语料库数据(Davies, 2008-)揭示了考虑这些词缀与体裁关系的生产力的重要性,因为-acy在学术文本中尤其常见,主要是在某些社会科学中。本文讨论了这两种变体对英语作为第二语言的学习者和教师的影响,特别是对高水平学习者在学术环境中建立交际能力的影响,并对这两种变体的学习者语料库进行了初步比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
A Corpus Study of the English Suffixes -ness and -acy: Productivity, Genre, and Implications for L2 Learning
Despite substantial scholarship relating to word structure (Anderson, 2018), for English affixes the relationship between productivity, genre, and second language (L2) learning remains unclear. Analysis of the existing literature reveals that deadjectival noun suffixes (i.e., nouns derived from adjectives such as appropriacy or goodness) have been underexamined. To address this gap, we examine two rival suffixes, -acy and -ness, through the lens of Construction Morphology (Booij, 2010), considering numerous factors which might condition their varying usage. Critically, corpus data in the Corpus of Contemporary American English and the British National Corpus (Davies, 2008-) reveal the importance of considering these affixes’ productivity in relation to genre, since -acy is especially frequent in academic texts, principally within certain social sciences. The implications for learners and teachers of English as a second language are discussed, particularly higher-level learners building communicative competence in academic contexts, along with a preliminary learner corpus comparison of the two variants.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信