金融规划师公司的责任,以损害消费者投资计划的提供者,与法律确定性理论相关联

Vivi Nur Arzy, Yeti Sumiyati
{"title":"金融规划师公司的责任,以损害消费者投资计划的提供者,与法律确定性理论相关联","authors":"Vivi Nur Arzy, Yeti Sumiyati","doi":"10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i03.p08","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The principle of responsibility as one of the principles of GCG is reflected in the Company Law that every company may not carry out activities that are contrary to the law. This responsibility principle is also applied to companies engaged in the capital market. Financial planning companies are companies whose activities are connected to the capital market and can support the capital market. However, the regulations regarding financial planners have not been specifically regulated in statutory provisions. The existence of a legal vacuum regarding financial planners is used as an opening to commit violations by one of the financial planning companies so that it results in losses for consumers. This study used a normative juridical approach using a descriptive analytical research specification. The data collection technique used is through literature study using laws, books, journals and the internet related to the topic of the problem which will later be used as a reference for solving problems as part of data analysis. The analytical method used legal construction through the analogy method which is used to find specific provisions that become general provisions so that they can be applied to financial planning companies. The conclusions obtained from this research are: First, the regulation regarding financial planners in Indonesian laws and regulations has not been specifically and specifically regulated so that the existence of financial planners has not received legal certainty. Second, responsibility for financial planning companies providing investment programs that harm consumers can be subject to administrative, civil and criminal sanctions.","PeriodicalId":30763,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Perencana Keuangan Penyedia Program Investasi yang Merugikan Konsumen Dihubungkan dengan Teori Kepastian Hukum\",\"authors\":\"Vivi Nur Arzy, Yeti Sumiyati\",\"doi\":\"10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i03.p08\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The principle of responsibility as one of the principles of GCG is reflected in the Company Law that every company may not carry out activities that are contrary to the law. This responsibility principle is also applied to companies engaged in the capital market. Financial planning companies are companies whose activities are connected to the capital market and can support the capital market. However, the regulations regarding financial planners have not been specifically regulated in statutory provisions. The existence of a legal vacuum regarding financial planners is used as an opening to commit violations by one of the financial planning companies so that it results in losses for consumers. This study used a normative juridical approach using a descriptive analytical research specification. The data collection technique used is through literature study using laws, books, journals and the internet related to the topic of the problem which will later be used as a reference for solving problems as part of data analysis. The analytical method used legal construction through the analogy method which is used to find specific provisions that become general provisions so that they can be applied to financial planning companies. The conclusions obtained from this research are: First, the regulation regarding financial planners in Indonesian laws and regulations has not been specifically and specifically regulated so that the existence of financial planners has not received legal certainty. Second, responsibility for financial planning companies providing investment programs that harm consumers can be subject to administrative, civil and criminal sanctions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30763,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i03.p08\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2021.v10.i03.p08","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

责任原则作为GCG的原则之一,体现在《公司法》中,即每个公司都不得进行违法的活动。这一责任原则也适用于从事资本市场的公司。理财公司是指活动与资本市场有联系并能支持资本市场的公司。然而,有关理财规划师的规定并没有在法律条文中具体规定。理财规划师法律真空的存在,被某一理财公司利用来违规,从而给消费者造成损失。本研究采用规范性的司法方法,采用描述性分析研究规范。使用的数据收集技术是通过文献研究,使用与问题主题相关的法律,书籍,期刊和互联网,稍后将作为解决问题的参考,作为数据分析的一部分。分析方法采用类比法进行法律建构,通过类比法找到具体规定成为一般规定,从而适用于理财公司。本研究得出的结论是:第一,印尼法律法规中对理财师的监管没有具体、明确的规定,理财师的存在没有获得法律上的确定性。第二,提供损害消费者利益的投资项目的财务规划公司的责任可能受到行政、民事和刑事制裁。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tanggung Jawab Perusahaan Perencana Keuangan Penyedia Program Investasi yang Merugikan Konsumen Dihubungkan dengan Teori Kepastian Hukum
The principle of responsibility as one of the principles of GCG is reflected in the Company Law that every company may not carry out activities that are contrary to the law. This responsibility principle is also applied to companies engaged in the capital market. Financial planning companies are companies whose activities are connected to the capital market and can support the capital market. However, the regulations regarding financial planners have not been specifically regulated in statutory provisions. The existence of a legal vacuum regarding financial planners is used as an opening to commit violations by one of the financial planning companies so that it results in losses for consumers. This study used a normative juridical approach using a descriptive analytical research specification. The data collection technique used is through literature study using laws, books, journals and the internet related to the topic of the problem which will later be used as a reference for solving problems as part of data analysis. The analytical method used legal construction through the analogy method which is used to find specific provisions that become general provisions so that they can be applied to financial planning companies. The conclusions obtained from this research are: First, the regulation regarding financial planners in Indonesian laws and regulations has not been specifically and specifically regulated so that the existence of financial planners has not received legal certainty. Second, responsibility for financial planning companies providing investment programs that harm consumers can be subject to administrative, civil and criminal sanctions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信