L. Larreina de la Fuente, F. Villalón Ferrero, N. González Temprano, R. Lizarraga Rodríguez, M. Román Moleón, A. Urbistondo Galarraga
{"title":"磁性双J型支架在儿科患者中的应用。","authors":"L. Larreina de la Fuente, F. Villalón Ferrero, N. González Temprano, R. Lizarraga Rodríguez, M. Román Moleón, A. Urbistondo Galarraga","doi":"10.54847/cp.2022.02.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTraditionally, double J stent removal in pediatric patients has required cystoscopy under general anesthesia. Magnetic stents allow for double J stent removal without the need for anesthesia. This work describes our initial experience with these stents.\n\n\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\nA prospective cohort study of patients under 14 years of age carrying magnetic double J stents from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Variables assessed included baseline diagnosis, surgical procedure, placement success rate, complications associated with use, and need for general anesthesia at removal.\n\n\nRESULTS\n23 stents (4.8 Fr, 15 cm-20 cm) were placed in 21 patients, 62% of whom were male. Mean age was 5.01 years (3 months-13 years). Indications for placement included Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty (34.8%), endoscopic dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) (21.8%), cystoscopic dilatation of the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) (17.4%), endoscopic lithotripsy (13.1%), renal trauma (4.3%), suspected retroiliac ureter (4.3%), and cystoscopic drainage of pyonephrosis (4.3%). Mean time of stent use was 4.2 weeks. 3 complications (13%) associated with the double J stent - 1 urinary tract infection (UTI), 1 stent obstruction, and 1 distal stent migration - were recorded. 95.5% of magnetic stents were successfully removed without anesthesia.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nMagnetic double J stents can be regarded as an effective alternative to conventional double J stents, since they avoid an additional surgical procedure with general anesthesia in pediatric patients.","PeriodicalId":10316,"journal":{"name":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","volume":"7 1","pages":"85-90"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of magnetic double J stents in pediatric patients.\",\"authors\":\"L. Larreina de la Fuente, F. Villalón Ferrero, N. González Temprano, R. Lizarraga Rodríguez, M. Román Moleón, A. Urbistondo Galarraga\",\"doi\":\"10.54847/cp.2022.02.17\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTraditionally, double J stent removal in pediatric patients has required cystoscopy under general anesthesia. Magnetic stents allow for double J stent removal without the need for anesthesia. This work describes our initial experience with these stents.\\n\\n\\nMATERIAL AND METHODS\\nA prospective cohort study of patients under 14 years of age carrying magnetic double J stents from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Variables assessed included baseline diagnosis, surgical procedure, placement success rate, complications associated with use, and need for general anesthesia at removal.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\n23 stents (4.8 Fr, 15 cm-20 cm) were placed in 21 patients, 62% of whom were male. Mean age was 5.01 years (3 months-13 years). Indications for placement included Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty (34.8%), endoscopic dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) (21.8%), cystoscopic dilatation of the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) (17.4%), endoscopic lithotripsy (13.1%), renal trauma (4.3%), suspected retroiliac ureter (4.3%), and cystoscopic drainage of pyonephrosis (4.3%). Mean time of stent use was 4.2 weeks. 3 complications (13%) associated with the double J stent - 1 urinary tract infection (UTI), 1 stent obstruction, and 1 distal stent migration - were recorded. 95.5% of magnetic stents were successfully removed without anesthesia.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nMagnetic double J stents can be regarded as an effective alternative to conventional double J stents, since they avoid an additional surgical procedure with general anesthesia in pediatric patients.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"85-90\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2022.02.17\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cirugia pediatrica : organo oficial de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Pediatrica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54847/cp.2022.02.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的传统上,儿科患者双J型支架取出需要在全身麻醉下进行膀胱镜检查。磁性支架允许在不需要麻醉的情况下移除双J支架。这项工作描述了我们使用这些支架的初步经验。材料与方法对2018年至2021年14岁以下携带磁性双J型支架的患者进行前瞻性队列研究。评估的变量包括基线诊断、手术程序、放置成功率、使用相关并发症以及移除时是否需要全身麻醉。结果21例患者共放置支架23个(4.8 Fr, 15 cm ~ 20 cm),男性占62%。平均年龄5.01岁(3个月~ 13岁)。放置指征包括Anderson-Hynes分断肾盂成形术(34.8%)、内镜下肾盂输尿管结扩张术(21.8%)、膀胱镜下输尿管膀胱结扩张术(17.4%)、内镜下碎石术(13.1%)、肾外伤(4.3%)、疑似髂后输尿管(4.3%)、膀胱镜下肾盂积水引流术(4.3%)。平均支架使用时间为4.2周。记录了3例与双J型支架相关的并发症(13%)- 1例尿路感染(UTI), 1例支架梗阻,1例支架远端移位。95.5%的磁性支架在不麻醉的情况下成功取出。结论磁性双J型支架可作为常规双J型支架的有效替代方法,避免了小儿患者在全身麻醉下进行额外的手术。
Use of magnetic double J stents in pediatric patients.
OBJECTIVE
Traditionally, double J stent removal in pediatric patients has required cystoscopy under general anesthesia. Magnetic stents allow for double J stent removal without the need for anesthesia. This work describes our initial experience with these stents.
MATERIAL AND METHODS
A prospective cohort study of patients under 14 years of age carrying magnetic double J stents from 2018 to 2021 was performed. Variables assessed included baseline diagnosis, surgical procedure, placement success rate, complications associated with use, and need for general anesthesia at removal.
RESULTS
23 stents (4.8 Fr, 15 cm-20 cm) were placed in 21 patients, 62% of whom were male. Mean age was 5.01 years (3 months-13 years). Indications for placement included Anderson-Hynes dismembered pyeloplasty (34.8%), endoscopic dilatation of the ureteropelvic junction (UPJ) (21.8%), cystoscopic dilatation of the ureterovesical junction (UVJ) (17.4%), endoscopic lithotripsy (13.1%), renal trauma (4.3%), suspected retroiliac ureter (4.3%), and cystoscopic drainage of pyonephrosis (4.3%). Mean time of stent use was 4.2 weeks. 3 complications (13%) associated with the double J stent - 1 urinary tract infection (UTI), 1 stent obstruction, and 1 distal stent migration - were recorded. 95.5% of magnetic stents were successfully removed without anesthesia.
CONCLUSIONS
Magnetic double J stents can be regarded as an effective alternative to conventional double J stents, since they avoid an additional surgical procedure with general anesthesia in pediatric patients.