通过电能表的发展比较分析IEEE 1459与保守功率理论

G. J. Schäffer, F. Arduini, F. Moura, M. Mendonça, A. Rosentino, P. Rezende, M. Albertini
{"title":"通过电能表的发展比较分析IEEE 1459与保守功率理论","authors":"G. J. Schäffer, F. Arduini, F. Moura, M. Mendonça, A. Rosentino, P. Rezende, M. Albertini","doi":"10.24084/REPQJ16.262","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With the undoubted growth of power electronic devices, ie, non-linear loads, there was a need for a deeper study in the power calculation, taking into account the harmonic distortions caused by these loads. Therefore, the present work aims to present, based on a test electrical system, a comparative analysis between two power theories with great discussion at present, the first one being the IEEE 1459 standard and the second the Conservative Power Theory.","PeriodicalId":21007,"journal":{"name":"Renewable energy & power quality journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis between IEEE 1459 and Conservative Power Theory Through the Development of Power Meters\",\"authors\":\"G. J. Schäffer, F. Arduini, F. Moura, M. Mendonça, A. Rosentino, P. Rezende, M. Albertini\",\"doi\":\"10.24084/REPQJ16.262\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With the undoubted growth of power electronic devices, ie, non-linear loads, there was a need for a deeper study in the power calculation, taking into account the harmonic distortions caused by these loads. Therefore, the present work aims to present, based on a test electrical system, a comparative analysis between two power theories with great discussion at present, the first one being the IEEE 1459 standard and the second the Conservative Power Theory.\",\"PeriodicalId\":21007,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Renewable energy & power quality journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Renewable energy & power quality journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24084/REPQJ16.262\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Renewable energy & power quality journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24084/REPQJ16.262","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

随着电力电子设备,即非线性负载的不断增加,需要在功率计算中进行更深入的研究,考虑这些负载引起的谐波畸变。因此,本文旨在基于一个测试电气系统,对目前讨论较多的两种功率理论进行比较分析,第一种是IEEE 1459标准,第二种是保守功率理论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis between IEEE 1459 and Conservative Power Theory Through the Development of Power Meters
With the undoubted growth of power electronic devices, ie, non-linear loads, there was a need for a deeper study in the power calculation, taking into account the harmonic distortions caused by these loads. Therefore, the present work aims to present, based on a test electrical system, a comparative analysis between two power theories with great discussion at present, the first one being the IEEE 1459 standard and the second the Conservative Power Theory.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信