Abdulmelik Yıldız , Özlem Seçen , Cennet Yıldız , Mehtap Çiçekçi
{"title":"绝经前妇女乳腺动脉钙化与血脂、血浆动脉粥样硬化指数、Castelli危险指数及动脉粥样硬化系数的关系","authors":"Abdulmelik Yıldız , Özlem Seçen , Cennet Yıldız , Mehtap Çiçekçi","doi":"10.1016/j.ijcme.2016.05.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the breast arterial calcification (BAC) and the plasma atherogenic index (PAI), atherogenic coefficient (AC), Castelli risk index-I (CRI-I) and Castelli risk index-II (CRI-II).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 60 premenopausal women aged over 40<!--> <!-->years with BAC on mammograms and control group of 60 women without BAC. Serum glucose, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoproteincholesterol (LDLc), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc), and total cholesterol (TC), levels were measured. Lipid indices were calculated using the appropriate formula.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LDLc, non-HDLc levels were significantly higher, HDLc levels were siginificantly lower in patient group compared to the control group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027, and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014, respectively). Patient group had significantly higher PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II levels than the control group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between BAC and PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.267 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.282 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.282 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.271 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, respectively). LDLc and non-HDLc were positively correlated whereas HDLc was negatively correlated with the BAC (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.188 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.202 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->0.223 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BAC is a valuable tool for the prediction of deranged lipid profile. Dyslipidemia, PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II are risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis. Our results indicate that BAC is potentially useful tool for the detection of dyslipidemia and early atherosclerosis in premenopausal women.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":73333,"journal":{"name":"IJC metabolic & endocrine","volume":"11 ","pages":"Pages 19-22"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijcme.2016.05.003","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship between breast arterial calcification and lipid profile, plasma atherogenic index, Castelli's risk index and atherogenic coefficient in premenopausal women\",\"authors\":\"Abdulmelik Yıldız , Özlem Seçen , Cennet Yıldız , Mehtap Çiçekçi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijcme.2016.05.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the breast arterial calcification (BAC) and the plasma atherogenic index (PAI), atherogenic coefficient (AC), Castelli risk index-I (CRI-I) and Castelli risk index-II (CRI-II).</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>This retrospective study included 60 premenopausal women aged over 40<!--> <!-->years with BAC on mammograms and control group of 60 women without BAC. Serum glucose, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoproteincholesterol (LDLc), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc), and total cholesterol (TC), levels were measured. Lipid indices were calculated using the appropriate formula.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>LDLc, non-HDLc levels were significantly higher, HDLc levels were siginificantly lower in patient group compared to the control group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.007, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027, and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014, respectively). Patient group had significantly higher PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II levels than the control group (p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between BAC and PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.267 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.282 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.282 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.002, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.271 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.003, respectively). LDLc and non-HDLc were positively correlated whereas HDLc was negatively correlated with the BAC (r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.188 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.039, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.202 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.027, r<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->−<!--> <!-->0.223 and p<!--> <!-->=<!--> <!-->0.014, respectively).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>BAC is a valuable tool for the prediction of deranged lipid profile. Dyslipidemia, PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II are risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis. Our results indicate that BAC is potentially useful tool for the detection of dyslipidemia and early atherosclerosis in premenopausal women.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":73333,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IJC metabolic & endocrine\",\"volume\":\"11 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 19-22\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.ijcme.2016.05.003\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IJC metabolic & endocrine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214762416300093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IJC metabolic & endocrine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214762416300093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
目的探讨乳腺动脉钙化(BAC)与血浆动脉粥样硬化指数(PAI)、动脉粥样硬化系数(AC)、Castelli风险指数- i (CRI-I)和Castelli风险指数- ii (CRI-II)的关系。方法回顾性研究60例40岁以上绝经前女性,乳房x线检查有BAC,对照组60例无BAC。测定血清葡萄糖、甘油三酯(TG)、低密度脂蛋白胆固醇(LDLc)、高密度脂蛋白胆固醇(HDLc)和总胆固醇(TC)水平。脂质指数按相应公式计算。结果患者组sldlc、非HDLc水平显著高于对照组,HDLc水平显著低于对照组(p = 0.007、p = 0.027、p = 0.014)。患者组PAI、AC、cri、cri水平均显著高于对照组(p = 0.003、p = 0.002、p = 0.002、p = 0.003)。BAC与PAI、AC、cri和CRI-II呈显著正相关(r = 0.267, p = 0.003, r = 0.282, p = 0.002, r = 0.282, p = 0.002, r = 0.271, p = 0.003)。LDLc与非HDLc呈正相关,HDLc与BAC呈负相关(r = 0.188, p = 0.039, r = 0.202, p = 0.027, r = - 0.223, p = 0.014)。结论bac是预测血脂异常的有效工具。血脂异常、PAI、AC、cri、CRI-II是动脉粥样硬化发生的危险因素。我们的研究结果表明,BAC是检测绝经前妇女血脂异常和早期动脉粥样硬化的潜在有用工具。
Relationship between breast arterial calcification and lipid profile, plasma atherogenic index, Castelli's risk index and atherogenic coefficient in premenopausal women
Objective
The aim of this study was to investigate the relationship between the breast arterial calcification (BAC) and the plasma atherogenic index (PAI), atherogenic coefficient (AC), Castelli risk index-I (CRI-I) and Castelli risk index-II (CRI-II).
Methods
This retrospective study included 60 premenopausal women aged over 40 years with BAC on mammograms and control group of 60 women without BAC. Serum glucose, triglyceride (TG), low-density lipoproteincholesterol (LDLc), high-density lipoprotein-cholesterol (HDLc), and total cholesterol (TC), levels were measured. Lipid indices were calculated using the appropriate formula.
Results
LDLc, non-HDLc levels were significantly higher, HDLc levels were siginificantly lower in patient group compared to the control group (p = 0.007, p = 0.027, and p = 0.014, respectively). Patient group had significantly higher PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II levels than the control group (p = 0.003, p = 0.002, p = 0.002 and p = 0.003, respectively). A significant positive correlation was found between BAC and PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II (r = 0.267 and p = 0.003, r = 0.282 and p = 0.002, r = 0.282 and p = 0.002, r = 0.271 and p = 0.003, respectively). LDLc and non-HDLc were positively correlated whereas HDLc was negatively correlated with the BAC (r = 0.188 and p = 0.039, r = 0.202 and p = 0.027, r = − 0.223 and p = 0.014, respectively).
Conclusion
BAC is a valuable tool for the prediction of deranged lipid profile. Dyslipidemia, PAI, AC, CRI-I and CRI-II are risk factors for the development of atherosclerosis. Our results indicate that BAC is potentially useful tool for the detection of dyslipidemia and early atherosclerosis in premenopausal women.