用于索引的软件工具:重新访问

The indexer Pub Date : 1999-10-01 DOI:10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5

N. Mulvany

{"title":"用于索引的软件工具:重新访问","authors":"N. Mulvany","doi":"10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Basic features of four embedded indexing programs are discussed and compared with a dedicated indexing program. The programs are Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, RoboHELP and Macrex. The tests performed duplicate tests done ten years earlier. The author outlines features that have improved during the past decade and deficiencies that still exist in embedded indexing software.","PeriodicalId":83061,"journal":{"name":"The indexer","volume":"58 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Software tools for indexing: revisited\",\"authors\":\"N. Mulvany\",\"doi\":\"10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Basic features of four embedded indexing programs are discussed and compared with a dedicated indexing program. The programs are Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, RoboHELP and Macrex. The tests performed duplicate tests done ten years earlier. The author outlines features that have improved during the past decade and deficiencies that still exist in embedded indexing software.\",\"PeriodicalId\":83061,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The indexer\",\"volume\":\"58 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The indexer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The indexer","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/indexer.1999.21.4.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 3

摘要

讨论了四种嵌入式标引程序的基本特点，并与专用标引程序进行了比较。这些程序是Word、FrameMaker、PageMaker、RoboHELP和Macrex。这些测试重复了十年前的测试。作者概述了嵌入式索引软件在过去十年中改进的功能和仍然存在的不足。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Software tools for indexing: revisited

Basic features of four embedded indexing programs are discussed and compared with a dedicated indexing program. The programs are Word, FrameMaker, PageMaker, RoboHELP and Macrex. The tests performed duplicate tests done ten years earlier. The author outlines features that have improved during the past decade and deficiencies that still exist in embedded indexing software.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

The indexer

自引率

0.00%

发文量