Jordin Metz, Pengxiao Zuo, Bo Wang, Michael S. Wong and Pedro J. J. Alvarez*,
{"title":"紫外/氯降解全氟辛酸","authors":"Jordin Metz, Pengxiao Zuo, Bo Wang, Michael S. Wong and Pedro J. J. Alvarez*, ","doi":"10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00452","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p >While per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant to chemical reactions traditionally used in water treatment, we report the novel finding that combining ultraviolet (UV, 254 nm) light and chlorine can promote perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) degradation. About 12% removal of 100 μg/L PFOA was observed after 30 min of irradiation (6.5 × 10<sup>–6</sup> Einstein L<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup>) in the presence of 1.4 mM (106 mg/L) NaOCl, compared to only 1% removal by UV photolysis and no removal by NaOCl alone. UV/chlorine with 0.02 mM NaOCl (1.5 mg/L, a more common dose for water treatment) removed 6 μg/L PFOA within 30 min. To better detect defluorination, 50 mg/L PFOA was used, and UV/chlorine released significantly more fluoride (382 μg/L) than UV photolysis (0 μg/L) and dark controls (0 μg/L) over 30 min. By 60 min, this represents 32% of the maximum possible defluorination for the amount of PFOA removed by UV/chlorine versus 2% for UV photolysis. Radical scavenger tests indicated that Cl<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup> play a crucial role in PFOA degradation, which we postulate is initiated by electron abstraction leading to a decarboxylation–hydroxylation–elimination–hydrolysis pathway. Whereas reaction rates were relatively slow for practical application in water treatment plants, these results underscore overlooked reactions with common water treatment constituents that may influence the fate of PFAS.</p>","PeriodicalId":37,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.9000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Perfluorooctanoic acid Degradation by UV/Chlorine\",\"authors\":\"Jordin Metz, Pengxiao Zuo, Bo Wang, Michael S. Wong and Pedro J. J. Alvarez*, \",\"doi\":\"10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00452\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p >While per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant to chemical reactions traditionally used in water treatment, we report the novel finding that combining ultraviolet (UV, 254 nm) light and chlorine can promote perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) degradation. About 12% removal of 100 μg/L PFOA was observed after 30 min of irradiation (6.5 × 10<sup>–6</sup> Einstein L<sup>–1</sup> s<sup>–1</sup>) in the presence of 1.4 mM (106 mg/L) NaOCl, compared to only 1% removal by UV photolysis and no removal by NaOCl alone. UV/chlorine with 0.02 mM NaOCl (1.5 mg/L, a more common dose for water treatment) removed 6 μg/L PFOA within 30 min. To better detect defluorination, 50 mg/L PFOA was used, and UV/chlorine released significantly more fluoride (382 μg/L) than UV photolysis (0 μg/L) and dark controls (0 μg/L) over 30 min. By 60 min, this represents 32% of the maximum possible defluorination for the amount of PFOA removed by UV/chlorine versus 2% for UV photolysis. Radical scavenger tests indicated that Cl<sup>•</sup> and Cl<sub>2</sub><sup>•–</sup> play a crucial role in PFOA degradation, which we postulate is initiated by electron abstraction leading to a decarboxylation–hydroxylation–elimination–hydrolysis pathway. Whereas reaction rates were relatively slow for practical application in water treatment plants, these results underscore overlooked reactions with common water treatment constituents that may influence the fate of PFAS.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":37,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00452\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Technology Letters Environ.","FirstCategoryId":"1","ListUrlMain":"https://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/acs.estlett.2c00452","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8
摘要
虽然单氟烷基和多氟烷基物质(PFAS)难以进行传统水处理中使用的化学反应,但我们报告了紫外线(UV, 254 nm)光和氯结合可以促进全氟辛酸(PFOA)降解的新发现。在1.4 mM (106 mg/L) NaOCl的作用下,照射30 min (6.5 × 10-6 Einstein L - 1 s-1),对100 μg/L PFOA的去除率约为12%,而紫外光解的去除率仅为1%,单独NaOCl的去除率为零。0.02 mM NaOCl (1.5 mg/L,水处理常用剂量)的UV/氯在30分钟内去除6 μg/L PFOA。为了更好地检测除氟,使用50 mg/L PFOA,在30分钟内,UV/氯释放的氟化物(382 μg/L)明显高于UV光解(0 μg/L)和暗对照(0 μg/L)。到60分钟,这代表了UV/氯去除PFOA的最大可能除氟量的32%,而UV光解为2%。自由基清除剂试验表明,Cl•和Cl2•-在PFOA降解中起着至关重要的作用,我们假设这是由电子抽离引发的脱羧-羟化-消除-水解途径。尽管在水处理厂的实际应用中,反应速率相对较慢,但这些结果强调了与常见水处理成分之间可能影响PFAS命运的被忽视的反应。
While per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are recalcitrant to chemical reactions traditionally used in water treatment, we report the novel finding that combining ultraviolet (UV, 254 nm) light and chlorine can promote perfluorooctanoic acid (PFOA) degradation. About 12% removal of 100 μg/L PFOA was observed after 30 min of irradiation (6.5 × 10–6 Einstein L–1 s–1) in the presence of 1.4 mM (106 mg/L) NaOCl, compared to only 1% removal by UV photolysis and no removal by NaOCl alone. UV/chlorine with 0.02 mM NaOCl (1.5 mg/L, a more common dose for water treatment) removed 6 μg/L PFOA within 30 min. To better detect defluorination, 50 mg/L PFOA was used, and UV/chlorine released significantly more fluoride (382 μg/L) than UV photolysis (0 μg/L) and dark controls (0 μg/L) over 30 min. By 60 min, this represents 32% of the maximum possible defluorination for the amount of PFOA removed by UV/chlorine versus 2% for UV photolysis. Radical scavenger tests indicated that Cl• and Cl2•– play a crucial role in PFOA degradation, which we postulate is initiated by electron abstraction leading to a decarboxylation–hydroxylation–elimination–hydrolysis pathway. Whereas reaction rates were relatively slow for practical application in water treatment plants, these results underscore overlooked reactions with common water treatment constituents that may influence the fate of PFAS.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Science & Technology Letters serves as an international forum for brief communications on experimental or theoretical results of exceptional timeliness in all aspects of environmental science, both pure and applied. Published as soon as accepted, these communications are summarized in monthly issues. Additionally, the journal features short reviews on emerging topics in environmental science and technology.