社会资本作为基于社区的癌症预防和控制参与性研究的框架

Donna Kenerson, M. Hargreaves, Kushal A. Patel, C. Larson, J. Drake, Venita Bush
{"title":"社会资本作为基于社区的癌症预防和控制参与性研究的框架","authors":"Donna Kenerson, M. Hargreaves, Kushal A. Patel, C. Larson, J. Drake, Venita Bush","doi":"10.1037/e520982012-008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"B41 Purpose: The aim of this research was to explore whether key dimensions of social capital might inform the community based participatory research (CBPR) approach to cancer prevention and control interventions that target low-income African American communities.\u2028 Methodology: Focus groups were conducted at community health centers located in Nashville, Chattanooga, and Memphis. African American men and women, representing low-income urban communities, participated in 54 focus groups. The focus groups used semi-structured questions integrating multiple health-related constructs of social capital with community perceptions centering on the facilitators and barriers to cancer control and prevention. These constructs included community groups, neighborhoods, networks, collective action, communication, and leadership.\u2028 Results:\u2028 Participants characterized community as going beyond physical boundaries to interactions among neighbors. Varied beliefs were expressed about the decline in neighborhood cohesion that included changes in racial or ethnic composition and gentrification. Church pastors and politicians were considered leaders of the community; however, church leaders were perceived as more active in the health-related needs of their communities. The poor health of communities was attributed to a lack of motivation by community members to change lifestyles and behaviors. Perceptions surrounding cancer included the belief that cancer was a death sentence and people generally did not want to know if they had cancer. On the other hand, some believed that an early diagnosis of cancer might improve one’s survival, and that there needed to be greater communication of this fact. Major barriers to cancer-related screening included the fear of cancer screening outcomes and the general lack of knowledge related to health screening guidelines.\u2028 Conclusion: Findings suggest the need for greater awareness of the social processes affecting the health of communities. This heightened awareness can improve the understanding of health and health inequalities affected by social capital. The assessment of social capital, as a health-related construct, may enhance community based participatory research focusing on cancer disparities by creating opportunities for individual and group interactions that facilitate effective and sustainable community health action.\u2028 Funded by NIH 5P20 MD 000516 (EXPORT), NCI U01 CA114641 (Community Networks Program)","PeriodicalId":9487,"journal":{"name":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social capital as a framework for community based participatory research in cancer prevention and control\",\"authors\":\"Donna Kenerson, M. Hargreaves, Kushal A. Patel, C. Larson, J. Drake, Venita Bush\",\"doi\":\"10.1037/e520982012-008\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"B41 Purpose: The aim of this research was to explore whether key dimensions of social capital might inform the community based participatory research (CBPR) approach to cancer prevention and control interventions that target low-income African American communities.\\u2028 Methodology: Focus groups were conducted at community health centers located in Nashville, Chattanooga, and Memphis. African American men and women, representing low-income urban communities, participated in 54 focus groups. The focus groups used semi-structured questions integrating multiple health-related constructs of social capital with community perceptions centering on the facilitators and barriers to cancer control and prevention. These constructs included community groups, neighborhoods, networks, collective action, communication, and leadership.\\u2028 Results:\\u2028 Participants characterized community as going beyond physical boundaries to interactions among neighbors. Varied beliefs were expressed about the decline in neighborhood cohesion that included changes in racial or ethnic composition and gentrification. Church pastors and politicians were considered leaders of the community; however, church leaders were perceived as more active in the health-related needs of their communities. The poor health of communities was attributed to a lack of motivation by community members to change lifestyles and behaviors. Perceptions surrounding cancer included the belief that cancer was a death sentence and people generally did not want to know if they had cancer. On the other hand, some believed that an early diagnosis of cancer might improve one’s survival, and that there needed to be greater communication of this fact. Major barriers to cancer-related screening included the fear of cancer screening outcomes and the general lack of knowledge related to health screening guidelines.\\u2028 Conclusion: Findings suggest the need for greater awareness of the social processes affecting the health of communities. This heightened awareness can improve the understanding of health and health inequalities affected by social capital. The assessment of social capital, as a health-related construct, may enhance community based participatory research focusing on cancer disparities by creating opportunities for individual and group interactions that facilitate effective and sustainable community health action.\\u2028 Funded by NIH 5P20 MD 000516 (EXPORT), NCI U01 CA114641 (Community Networks Program)\",\"PeriodicalId\":9487,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1037/e520982012-008\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cancer Epidemiology and Prevention Biomarkers","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1037/e520982012-008","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是探讨社会资本的关键维度是否可以为针对低收入非洲裔美国人社区的基于社区的参与式研究(CBPR)方法提供信息,以进行癌症预防和控制干预。
方法:焦点小组在纳什维尔、查塔努加和孟菲斯的社区卫生中心进行。代表低收入城市社区的非裔美国人男女参加了54个焦点小组。焦点小组采用半结构化问题,将社会资本的多种健康相关结构与社区观念结合起来,以癌症控制和预防的促进因素和障碍为中心。这些结构包括社区团体、邻里、网络、集体行动、沟通和领导。
结果:
参与者将社区描述为超越物理边界的邻居之间的互动。人们对社区凝聚力的下降表达了不同的看法,包括种族或民族构成的变化和士绅化。教会牧师和政治家被认为是社区的领袖;然而,教会领袖被认为更积极地满足其社区的健康相关需求。社区健康状况不佳的原因是社区成员缺乏改变生活方式和行为的动力。人们对癌症的认知包括认为癌症是一种死刑判决,人们通常不想知道自己是否患有癌症。另一方面,一些人认为癌症的早期诊断可能会提高一个人的存活率,并且需要对这一事实进行更多的交流。癌症相关筛查的主要障碍包括对癌症筛查结果的恐惧以及普遍缺乏与健康筛查指南相关的知识。
结论:研究结果表明,需要提高对影响社区健康的社会进程的认识。提高认识可以增进对受社会资本影响的健康和健康不平等现象的理解。社会资本评估作为一种与健康有关的结构,可以通过为促进有效和可持续的社区卫生行动的个人和团体互动创造机会,加强以社区为基础的关注癌症差异的参与性研究。
由NIH 5P20 MD 000516 (EXPORT), NCI U01 CA114641(社区网络计划)资助
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Social capital as a framework for community based participatory research in cancer prevention and control
B41 Purpose: The aim of this research was to explore whether key dimensions of social capital might inform the community based participatory research (CBPR) approach to cancer prevention and control interventions that target low-income African American communities.
 Methodology: Focus groups were conducted at community health centers located in Nashville, Chattanooga, and Memphis. African American men and women, representing low-income urban communities, participated in 54 focus groups. The focus groups used semi-structured questions integrating multiple health-related constructs of social capital with community perceptions centering on the facilitators and barriers to cancer control and prevention. These constructs included community groups, neighborhoods, networks, collective action, communication, and leadership.
 Results:
 Participants characterized community as going beyond physical boundaries to interactions among neighbors. Varied beliefs were expressed about the decline in neighborhood cohesion that included changes in racial or ethnic composition and gentrification. Church pastors and politicians were considered leaders of the community; however, church leaders were perceived as more active in the health-related needs of their communities. The poor health of communities was attributed to a lack of motivation by community members to change lifestyles and behaviors. Perceptions surrounding cancer included the belief that cancer was a death sentence and people generally did not want to know if they had cancer. On the other hand, some believed that an early diagnosis of cancer might improve one’s survival, and that there needed to be greater communication of this fact. Major barriers to cancer-related screening included the fear of cancer screening outcomes and the general lack of knowledge related to health screening guidelines.
 Conclusion: Findings suggest the need for greater awareness of the social processes affecting the health of communities. This heightened awareness can improve the understanding of health and health inequalities affected by social capital. The assessment of social capital, as a health-related construct, may enhance community based participatory research focusing on cancer disparities by creating opportunities for individual and group interactions that facilitate effective and sustainable community health action.
 Funded by NIH 5P20 MD 000516 (EXPORT), NCI U01 CA114641 (Community Networks Program)
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信