中国成品油物流管道定价策略的评估与优化

IF 4.8 Q2 ENERGY & FUELS
Rui Qiu, Renfu Tu, Xuemei Wei, Hao Zhang, Mengda Gao, Qi Liao, Yongtu Liang
{"title":"中国成品油物流管道定价策略的评估与优化","authors":"Rui Qiu,&nbsp;Renfu Tu,&nbsp;Xuemei Wei,&nbsp;Hao Zhang,&nbsp;Mengda Gao,&nbsp;Qi Liao,&nbsp;Yongtu Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100144","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In the early stage of pipeline network reform in China, it is still controversial to formulate an appropriate pipeline freight pricing strategy. Focusing on this issue, this paper puts forward an integrated framework to analyze the impact of different pipeline pricing strategies on the economic-environmental benefits of China’s oil product logistics. A basic mathematical programming model is developed to simulate the planning of nationwide oil product logistics at the tactical level. On this basis, five pipeline pricing strategies are customized for comparative analysis, including pricing as usual (PAU), pricing by benchmarking railway (PBR), pricing by discounting on excess (PDE), tiered pricing by mileage (TPM), and tiered pricing by volume (TPV). Then, the basic logistics optimization model is upgraded accordingly. The real-world case study in China in 2019 is carried out in detail and the results demonstrate that (i) Except for TPM, the other pricing strategies can achieve coordination between oil shippers and pipeline carriers compared with PAU; (ii) Ranked by economic performance as follows: PDE &gt;PBT&gt;TPV&gt; PAU&gt;TPM; (iii) As for PDE, it also helps to reduce carbon emissions by 0.5% annually. The proposed method can be a theoretical guide for oil and gas logistics managers and decision-makers within and beyond China.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100824,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","volume":"4 1","pages":"Article 100144"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000367/pdfft?md5=631ca531c2f8fcf9a3a77741799d8890&pid=1-s2.0-S2667143323000367-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and optimization of pipeline pricing strategies on oil product logistics in China\",\"authors\":\"Rui Qiu,&nbsp;Renfu Tu,&nbsp;Xuemei Wei,&nbsp;Hao Zhang,&nbsp;Mengda Gao,&nbsp;Qi Liao,&nbsp;Yongtu Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jpse.2023.100144\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In the early stage of pipeline network reform in China, it is still controversial to formulate an appropriate pipeline freight pricing strategy. Focusing on this issue, this paper puts forward an integrated framework to analyze the impact of different pipeline pricing strategies on the economic-environmental benefits of China’s oil product logistics. A basic mathematical programming model is developed to simulate the planning of nationwide oil product logistics at the tactical level. On this basis, five pipeline pricing strategies are customized for comparative analysis, including pricing as usual (PAU), pricing by benchmarking railway (PBR), pricing by discounting on excess (PDE), tiered pricing by mileage (TPM), and tiered pricing by volume (TPV). Then, the basic logistics optimization model is upgraded accordingly. The real-world case study in China in 2019 is carried out in detail and the results demonstrate that (i) Except for TPM, the other pricing strategies can achieve coordination between oil shippers and pipeline carriers compared with PAU; (ii) Ranked by economic performance as follows: PDE &gt;PBT&gt;TPV&gt; PAU&gt;TPM; (iii) As for PDE, it also helps to reduce carbon emissions by 0.5% annually. The proposed method can be a theoretical guide for oil and gas logistics managers and decision-makers within and beyond China.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100824,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"Article 100144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000367/pdfft?md5=631ca531c2f8fcf9a3a77741799d8890&pid=1-s2.0-S2667143323000367-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000367\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pipeline Science and Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2667143323000367","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在中国管网改革初期,如何制定合适的管道运费定价策略仍存在争议。针对这一问题,本文提出了一个综合框架,分析了不同管道定价策略对中国成品油物流经济环境效益的影响。本文建立了一个基本的数学编程模型,从战术层面模拟全国成品油物流规划。在此基础上,定制了五种管道定价策略进行比较分析,包括照常定价(PAU)、基准铁路定价(PBR)、超量折扣定价(PDE)、按里程阶梯定价(TPM)和按运量阶梯定价(TPV)。然后,对基本物流优化模型进行相应升级。对 2019 年中国的实际案例进行了详细研究,结果表明:①与 PAU 相比,除 TPM 外,其他定价策略均能实现石油托运人与管道承运人之间的协调;②按经济绩效排序如下:PDE>PBT>TPV>PAU>TPM;③对于 PDE,它还有助于每年减少 0.5%的碳排放。所提出的方法可为国内外油气物流管理者和决策者提供理论指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and optimization of pipeline pricing strategies on oil product logistics in China

In the early stage of pipeline network reform in China, it is still controversial to formulate an appropriate pipeline freight pricing strategy. Focusing on this issue, this paper puts forward an integrated framework to analyze the impact of different pipeline pricing strategies on the economic-environmental benefits of China’s oil product logistics. A basic mathematical programming model is developed to simulate the planning of nationwide oil product logistics at the tactical level. On this basis, five pipeline pricing strategies are customized for comparative analysis, including pricing as usual (PAU), pricing by benchmarking railway (PBR), pricing by discounting on excess (PDE), tiered pricing by mileage (TPM), and tiered pricing by volume (TPV). Then, the basic logistics optimization model is upgraded accordingly. The real-world case study in China in 2019 is carried out in detail and the results demonstrate that (i) Except for TPM, the other pricing strategies can achieve coordination between oil shippers and pipeline carriers compared with PAU; (ii) Ranked by economic performance as follows: PDE >PBT>TPV> PAU>TPM; (iii) As for PDE, it also helps to reduce carbon emissions by 0.5% annually. The proposed method can be a theoretical guide for oil and gas logistics managers and decision-makers within and beyond China.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信