定性访谈中的真相问题:从叙事角度的思考

William L. Randall, C. Phoenix
{"title":"定性访谈中的真相问题:从叙事角度的思考","authors":"William L. Randall, C. Phoenix","doi":"10.1080/19398440902908993","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper considers the narrative complexity of the telling–listening process that unfolds in qualitative interviews in sport and exercise sciences. Acknowledging the narrative complexity of memory itself, it critiques the perhaps implicit assumption in many researchers’ minds that interviewees’ responses to interviewers’ questions are to be taken as ‘the truth’ in some simple, straightforward manner. By the same token, it concludes by arguing that truth is ultimately no less problematic an issue in quantitative research than it is in qualitative research, merely problematic in a different way.","PeriodicalId":92578,"journal":{"name":"Qualitative research in sport and exercise","volume":"18 1","pages":"125 - 140"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"67","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The problem with truth in qualitative interviews: reflections from a narrative perspective\",\"authors\":\"William L. Randall, C. Phoenix\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19398440902908993\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper considers the narrative complexity of the telling–listening process that unfolds in qualitative interviews in sport and exercise sciences. Acknowledging the narrative complexity of memory itself, it critiques the perhaps implicit assumption in many researchers’ minds that interviewees’ responses to interviewers’ questions are to be taken as ‘the truth’ in some simple, straightforward manner. By the same token, it concludes by arguing that truth is ultimately no less problematic an issue in quantitative research than it is in qualitative research, merely problematic in a different way.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92578,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Qualitative research in sport and exercise\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 140\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"67\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Qualitative research in sport and exercise\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19398440902908993\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Qualitative research in sport and exercise","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19398440902908993","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 67

摘要

本文考虑了在体育和运动科学定性访谈中展开的讲述-倾听过程的叙事复杂性。承认记忆本身的叙事复杂性,它批评了许多研究人员心中可能隐含的假设,即受访者对采访者问题的回答以某种简单、直接的方式被视为“真相”。出于同样的原因,它的结论是,真理在定量研究中的问题最终并不比在定性研究中的问题少,只是问题的方式不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The problem with truth in qualitative interviews: reflections from a narrative perspective
This paper considers the narrative complexity of the telling–listening process that unfolds in qualitative interviews in sport and exercise sciences. Acknowledging the narrative complexity of memory itself, it critiques the perhaps implicit assumption in many researchers’ minds that interviewees’ responses to interviewers’ questions are to be taken as ‘the truth’ in some simple, straightforward manner. By the same token, it concludes by arguing that truth is ultimately no less problematic an issue in quantitative research than it is in qualitative research, merely problematic in a different way.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信