当没有消息就是坏消息时:通过患者参与改善诊断测试沟通

IF 0.6 Q4 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Terri A. Zomerlei, A. Carraher, A. Chao, Shonda Vink, R. Chandawarkar
{"title":"当没有消息就是坏消息时:通过患者参与改善诊断测试沟通","authors":"Terri A. Zomerlei, A. Carraher, A. Chao, Shonda Vink, R. Chandawarkar","doi":"10.1177/25160435211044586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Importance Up to 17% of diagnostic test results are missed, lost or ignored despite conventional fixes such as electronic physician reminders – naïvely, patients assume: ‘No-News-is-Good-News’. These lapses can result in poor outcomes, complications, and even death. In response, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-led physician quality reporting system measure#265 emphasizes prevention. This study aims to improve the timely review of results through increasing patient engagement. Design and Participants Ninety patients undergoing diagnostic testing were included in this Internal Review Board (IRB)-approved study. Two groups, group-A (patients with medical chart access through our EHR, n = 40); and group-B (controls, n = 50) were included. Group-A was reminded via written AVS and EHR portal messages to ask about their test results at their next appointment. Controls were sent no reminders, mimicking the status- quo. Main Outcomes At subsequent visits whether patients ‘asked’ or ‘did not ask’ about their results was recorded and analyzed. Study group participants were also surveyed on their preferences for reminder communication. Results Patients that were sent reminders were up to twenty times more likely to ask their provider regarding their test results than the control group (p < 0.0001). Eighty-one percent indicated that the reminders were helpful with 90% indicating they were ‘necessary’. Neither gender nor age seemed predictive factors of patient engagement. Conclusions and Relevance This pilot study demonstrates that engaging patients in their own care through already-existing tools (AVS, EHR portal messages) improves patient-physician communication, and could lead to lower rates of missed diagnostic tests.","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"190 1","pages":"221 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"When no news is bad news: Improving diagnostic testing communication through patient engagement\",\"authors\":\"Terri A. Zomerlei, A. Carraher, A. Chao, Shonda Vink, R. Chandawarkar\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25160435211044586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Importance Up to 17% of diagnostic test results are missed, lost or ignored despite conventional fixes such as electronic physician reminders – naïvely, patients assume: ‘No-News-is-Good-News’. These lapses can result in poor outcomes, complications, and even death. In response, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-led physician quality reporting system measure#265 emphasizes prevention. This study aims to improve the timely review of results through increasing patient engagement. Design and Participants Ninety patients undergoing diagnostic testing were included in this Internal Review Board (IRB)-approved study. Two groups, group-A (patients with medical chart access through our EHR, n = 40); and group-B (controls, n = 50) were included. Group-A was reminded via written AVS and EHR portal messages to ask about their test results at their next appointment. Controls were sent no reminders, mimicking the status- quo. Main Outcomes At subsequent visits whether patients ‘asked’ or ‘did not ask’ about their results was recorded and analyzed. Study group participants were also surveyed on their preferences for reminder communication. Results Patients that were sent reminders were up to twenty times more likely to ask their provider regarding their test results than the control group (p < 0.0001). Eighty-one percent indicated that the reminders were helpful with 90% indicating they were ‘necessary’. Neither gender nor age seemed predictive factors of patient engagement. Conclusions and Relevance This pilot study demonstrates that engaging patients in their own care through already-existing tools (AVS, EHR portal messages) improves patient-physician communication, and could lead to lower rates of missed diagnostic tests.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"volume\":\"190 1\",\"pages\":\"221 - 224\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211044586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211044586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

尽管有诸如电子医生提醒(naïvely)等常规补救措施,高达17%的诊断检测结果被遗漏、丢失或忽视,患者认为:“没有消息就是好消息”。这些失误可能导致不良结果、并发症,甚至死亡。作为回应,医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)领导的医生质量报告系统措施#265强调预防。本研究旨在通过提高患者参与度来改善及时审查结果。设计和参与者90名接受诊断测试的患者纳入了这项内部审查委员会(IRB)批准的研究。两组,a组(通过我们的电子病历访问病历的患者,n = 40);b组(对照组,n = 50)。通过AVS和EHR门户网站的书面信息提醒a组在下次预约时询问他们的测试结果。控制没有发送提醒,模仿现状。在随后的访问中,记录和分析患者是否“询问”或“未询问”他们的结果。研究小组的参与者还被调查了他们对提醒沟通的偏好。结果收到提醒的患者询问医生检查结果的可能性是对照组的20倍(p < 0.0001)。81%的人表示提醒是有帮助的,90%的人表示提醒是“必要的”。性别和年龄似乎都不是患者参与的预测因素。这项初步研究表明,通过现有工具(AVS、EHR门户信息)让患者参与自己的护理可以改善医患沟通,并可能降低诊断检查的漏报率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
When no news is bad news: Improving diagnostic testing communication through patient engagement
Importance Up to 17% of diagnostic test results are missed, lost or ignored despite conventional fixes such as electronic physician reminders – naïvely, patients assume: ‘No-News-is-Good-News’. These lapses can result in poor outcomes, complications, and even death. In response, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS)-led physician quality reporting system measure#265 emphasizes prevention. This study aims to improve the timely review of results through increasing patient engagement. Design and Participants Ninety patients undergoing diagnostic testing were included in this Internal Review Board (IRB)-approved study. Two groups, group-A (patients with medical chart access through our EHR, n = 40); and group-B (controls, n = 50) were included. Group-A was reminded via written AVS and EHR portal messages to ask about their test results at their next appointment. Controls were sent no reminders, mimicking the status- quo. Main Outcomes At subsequent visits whether patients ‘asked’ or ‘did not ask’ about their results was recorded and analyzed. Study group participants were also surveyed on their preferences for reminder communication. Results Patients that were sent reminders were up to twenty times more likely to ask their provider regarding their test results than the control group (p < 0.0001). Eighty-one percent indicated that the reminders were helpful with 90% indicating they were ‘necessary’. Neither gender nor age seemed predictive factors of patient engagement. Conclusions and Relevance This pilot study demonstrates that engaging patients in their own care through already-existing tools (AVS, EHR portal messages) improves patient-physician communication, and could lead to lower rates of missed diagnostic tests.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信