比较欧洲三个区域单模式初始条件大组合(SMILE)的内部变率

Fabian von Trentini, E. Aalbers, E. Fischer, R. Ludwig
{"title":"比较欧洲三个区域单模式初始条件大组合(SMILE)的内部变率","authors":"Fabian von Trentini, E. Aalbers, E. Fischer, R. Ludwig","doi":"10.5194/esd-2019-67","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Single model large ensembles are widely used model experiments to estimate internal climate variability. The underlying assumption is that the internal variability (here: inter-annual variability) of the chosen model is a good approximation of the observed natural (inter-annual) variability. In this study, we test this assumption based on three regional climate model large ensembles (16 members of an EC-EARTH-RACMO ensemble, 21 members of a CESM-CCLM ensemble, 50 members of a CanESM-CRCM ensemble) for four European domains (British Isles, France, Mid-Europe, Alps). Simulated inter-annual variability is evaluated against E-OBS and the inter-annunal variability and its future change are compared across the ensembles. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first comparison of regional large ensembles over Europe. Analysis comprises seasonal temperature and precipitation, as well as indicators for dry periods and heat waves. Results show a large consistency of all three ensembles with E-OBS data for most indicators and regions, validating the abilities of these ensembles to represent natural variability on the annual scale. EC-EARTH-RACMO shows the highest inter-annual variability for winter temperature and precipitation, whereas CESM-CCLM shows the highest variability for summer temperature and precipitation, as well as for heatwaves and dry periods. Despite these model differences, the sign of the future changes in internal variability is largely the same in all models: for summer temperature, summer precipitation and the number of heat waves, the internal variability increases, while it decreases for winter temperature. Changes of winter precipitation and dry periods are a bit unclear, with a tendency to increase for dry periods. The overall consistency across single model large ensembles and observations strengthens the concept of large ensembles, and underlines their great potential for understanding and quantifying the role of internal climate variability.","PeriodicalId":11466,"journal":{"name":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing internal variabilities in three regional single model initial-condition large ensembles (SMILE) over Europe\",\"authors\":\"Fabian von Trentini, E. Aalbers, E. Fischer, R. Ludwig\",\"doi\":\"10.5194/esd-2019-67\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Single model large ensembles are widely used model experiments to estimate internal climate variability. The underlying assumption is that the internal variability (here: inter-annual variability) of the chosen model is a good approximation of the observed natural (inter-annual) variability. In this study, we test this assumption based on three regional climate model large ensembles (16 members of an EC-EARTH-RACMO ensemble, 21 members of a CESM-CCLM ensemble, 50 members of a CanESM-CRCM ensemble) for four European domains (British Isles, France, Mid-Europe, Alps). Simulated inter-annual variability is evaluated against E-OBS and the inter-annunal variability and its future change are compared across the ensembles. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first comparison of regional large ensembles over Europe. Analysis comprises seasonal temperature and precipitation, as well as indicators for dry periods and heat waves. Results show a large consistency of all three ensembles with E-OBS data for most indicators and regions, validating the abilities of these ensembles to represent natural variability on the annual scale. EC-EARTH-RACMO shows the highest inter-annual variability for winter temperature and precipitation, whereas CESM-CCLM shows the highest variability for summer temperature and precipitation, as well as for heatwaves and dry periods. Despite these model differences, the sign of the future changes in internal variability is largely the same in all models: for summer temperature, summer precipitation and the number of heat waves, the internal variability increases, while it decreases for winter temperature. Changes of winter precipitation and dry periods are a bit unclear, with a tendency to increase for dry periods. The overall consistency across single model large ensembles and observations strengthens the concept of large ensembles, and underlines their great potential for understanding and quantifying the role of internal climate variability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11466,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earth System Dynamics Discussions\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"1-27\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earth System Dynamics Discussions\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-67\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earth System Dynamics Discussions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5194/esd-2019-67","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

摘要单模式大集合是广泛用于估算内部气候变率的模式实验。基本假设是所选模式的内部变率(这里是年际变率)是观测到的自然(年际)变率的良好近似值。在这项研究中,我们基于三个区域气候模式大集合(EC-EARTH-RACMO集合的16个成员,csm - cclm集合的21个成员,CanESM-CRCM集合的50个成员)对四个欧洲区域(不列颠群岛,法国,中欧,阿尔卑斯山)的这一假设进行了验证。利用E-OBS对模拟年际变率进行了评估,并比较了各组合的年际变率及其未来变化。据作者所知,这是第一次对欧洲的区域性大集合进行比较。分析包括季节温度和降水,以及干旱期和热浪的指标。结果表明,对于大多数指标和地区,所有三个集合与E-OBS数据具有很大的一致性,验证了这些集合在年尺度上代表自然变率的能力。EC-EARTH-RACMO在冬季温度和降水方面表现出最高的年际变率,而ccesm - cclm在夏季温度和降水以及热浪和干旱期表现出最高的年际变率。尽管存在这些模式差异,但所有模式的内部变率未来变化的标志基本相同:对于夏季温度、夏季降水和热浪次数,内部变率增加,而对于冬季温度,内部变率减少。冬季降水和干旱期的变化不太清楚,在干旱期有增加的趋势。单模式大集合和观测之间的总体一致性加强了大集合的概念,并强调了它们在理解和量化内部气候变率的作用方面的巨大潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparing internal variabilities in three regional single model initial-condition large ensembles (SMILE) over Europe
Abstract. Single model large ensembles are widely used model experiments to estimate internal climate variability. The underlying assumption is that the internal variability (here: inter-annual variability) of the chosen model is a good approximation of the observed natural (inter-annual) variability. In this study, we test this assumption based on three regional climate model large ensembles (16 members of an EC-EARTH-RACMO ensemble, 21 members of a CESM-CCLM ensemble, 50 members of a CanESM-CRCM ensemble) for four European domains (British Isles, France, Mid-Europe, Alps). Simulated inter-annual variability is evaluated against E-OBS and the inter-annunal variability and its future change are compared across the ensembles. To the knowledge of the authors, this is the first comparison of regional large ensembles over Europe. Analysis comprises seasonal temperature and precipitation, as well as indicators for dry periods and heat waves. Results show a large consistency of all three ensembles with E-OBS data for most indicators and regions, validating the abilities of these ensembles to represent natural variability on the annual scale. EC-EARTH-RACMO shows the highest inter-annual variability for winter temperature and precipitation, whereas CESM-CCLM shows the highest variability for summer temperature and precipitation, as well as for heatwaves and dry periods. Despite these model differences, the sign of the future changes in internal variability is largely the same in all models: for summer temperature, summer precipitation and the number of heat waves, the internal variability increases, while it decreases for winter temperature. Changes of winter precipitation and dry periods are a bit unclear, with a tendency to increase for dry periods. The overall consistency across single model large ensembles and observations strengthens the concept of large ensembles, and underlines their great potential for understanding and quantifying the role of internal climate variability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信