法德两国银行借贷的另类规范:理论、证据与政策启示

Robert E. Krainer
{"title":"法德两国银行借贷的另类规范:理论、证据与政策启示","authors":"Robert E. Krainer","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.2339150","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this paper I compare a capital budgeting model of of bank lending based on stock valuations to a supply/demand model based on an interest rate channel for France and Germany using non-nested hypothesis tests and omitted variables tests. For France both tests indicate a strong rejection of the supply/demand model with an interest rate channel and non-rejection of the capital budgeting model with a stock market channel. The results for Germany are mixed. For Monetary Financial Institutions the non-nested hypothesis tests rejected both models. For the commercial banking sector of Monetary Financial Institutions both tests rejected the supply/demand model but did not reject the capital budgeting model. Do these results have any implications for policy? If volatility in share prices cause volitility in bank lending which in turn causes volitility in real economic activity, then government may want to begin thinking about ways to dampen the volatility in the stock market such as imposing more stringent margin requirements on stock purchases and open market operations by central banks in a broad index of equity shares. I then consider the feasibility of Central Banks buying and selling a diversified portfolio of equites.","PeriodicalId":11754,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-10-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alternative Specifications of Bank Lending in France and Germany: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications\",\"authors\":\"Robert E. Krainer\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.2339150\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this paper I compare a capital budgeting model of of bank lending based on stock valuations to a supply/demand model based on an interest rate channel for France and Germany using non-nested hypothesis tests and omitted variables tests. For France both tests indicate a strong rejection of the supply/demand model with an interest rate channel and non-rejection of the capital budgeting model with a stock market channel. The results for Germany are mixed. For Monetary Financial Institutions the non-nested hypothesis tests rejected both models. For the commercial banking sector of Monetary Financial Institutions both tests rejected the supply/demand model but did not reject the capital budgeting model. Do these results have any implications for policy? If volatility in share prices cause volitility in bank lending which in turn causes volitility in real economic activity, then government may want to begin thinking about ways to dampen the volatility in the stock market such as imposing more stringent margin requirements on stock purchases and open market operations by central banks in a broad index of equity shares. I then consider the feasibility of Central Banks buying and selling a diversified portfolio of equites.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11754,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-10-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2339150\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Other Macroeconomics: Aggregative Models (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2339150","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在本文中,我使用非嵌套假设检验和省略变量检验比较了基于股票估值的银行贷款资本预算模型和基于利率渠道的供给/需求模型。对于法国,这两项测试都表明强烈拒绝带有利率渠道的供给/需求模型,而不拒绝带有股票市场渠道的资本预算模型。德国的结果喜忧参半。对于货币金融机构,非嵌套假设检验拒绝了这两个模型。对于货币金融机构的商业银行部门,这两项测试都拒绝了供需模型,但没有拒绝资本预算模型。这些结果对政策有什么启示吗?如果股价的波动导致银行贷款的波动,进而导致实体经济活动的波动,那么政府可能需要开始考虑抑制股市波动的方法,比如对股票购买和央行在广泛的股票指数中进行的公开市场操作施加更严格的保证金要求。然后,我考虑央行买卖多元化股票组合的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alternative Specifications of Bank Lending in France and Germany: Theory, Evidence and Policy Implications
In this paper I compare a capital budgeting model of of bank lending based on stock valuations to a supply/demand model based on an interest rate channel for France and Germany using non-nested hypothesis tests and omitted variables tests. For France both tests indicate a strong rejection of the supply/demand model with an interest rate channel and non-rejection of the capital budgeting model with a stock market channel. The results for Germany are mixed. For Monetary Financial Institutions the non-nested hypothesis tests rejected both models. For the commercial banking sector of Monetary Financial Institutions both tests rejected the supply/demand model but did not reject the capital budgeting model. Do these results have any implications for policy? If volatility in share prices cause volitility in bank lending which in turn causes volitility in real economic activity, then government may want to begin thinking about ways to dampen the volatility in the stock market such as imposing more stringent margin requirements on stock purchases and open market operations by central banks in a broad index of equity shares. I then consider the feasibility of Central Banks buying and selling a diversified portfolio of equites.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信