Medline对药物不良反应病例报告检索的效用评价。

J. Hamada, T. Orii, E. Negishi, Yasuhiko Yamada, Hitoshi Sato, T. Iga
{"title":"Medline对药物不良反应病例报告检索的效用评价。","authors":"J. Hamada, T. Orii, E. Negishi, Yasuhiko Yamada, Hitoshi Sato, T. Iga","doi":"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.27","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Database usage was evaluated regarding the retrieval of drug-induced adverse effect case reports. A search of case reports was performed using the on-line Medline (Ovid). Forty case reports were extracted from “Reactions” (adis INTERNATIONAL) used as secondary literature on adverse effects. From the original titles and abstracts, the name of the drugs and adverse effects were translated into Japanease and used to search data sets. After 6 pharmacists received a 30-minute explanation on how to use Medline since they had no previous experience in using Medline at the time of this study, the accessibility to the original case reports was examined and evaluated for their hitting rates. The hitting rates of the original data were 40-75%, and the data was divided into high-rate and low-rate groups. A major cause of a low hitting rate was that the “explode” function was not utilized to extend the terms of adverse effects. As a result, the “explode” function was found to be an important factor in effectively using Medline, especially when terms are not adequately chosen to retrieve case reports on adverse effects.","PeriodicalId":14621,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"29 1","pages":"27-35"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of Medline Utility for the Retrieval of Case Reports of Drug Adverse Effects.\",\"authors\":\"J. Hamada, T. Orii, E. Negishi, Yasuhiko Yamada, Hitoshi Sato, T. Iga\",\"doi\":\"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.27\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Database usage was evaluated regarding the retrieval of drug-induced adverse effect case reports. A search of case reports was performed using the on-line Medline (Ovid). Forty case reports were extracted from “Reactions” (adis INTERNATIONAL) used as secondary literature on adverse effects. From the original titles and abstracts, the name of the drugs and adverse effects were translated into Japanease and used to search data sets. After 6 pharmacists received a 30-minute explanation on how to use Medline since they had no previous experience in using Medline at the time of this study, the accessibility to the original case reports was examined and evaluated for their hitting rates. The hitting rates of the original data were 40-75%, and the data was divided into high-rate and low-rate groups. A major cause of a low hitting rate was that the “explode” function was not utilized to extend the terms of adverse effects. As a result, the “explode” function was found to be an important factor in effectively using Medline, especially when terms are not adequately chosen to retrieve case reports on adverse effects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"27-35\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.27\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.26.27","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对检索药物引起的不良反应病例报告的数据库使用情况进行评估。使用在线Medline (Ovid)对病例报告进行搜索。40例病例报告摘自“反应”(adis INTERNATIONAL),作为不良反应的次要文献。从原始标题和摘要中,将药物名称和不良反应翻译成日文,用于检索数据集。在6名药剂师接受了30分钟关于如何使用Medline的解释后(因为他们在本研究时没有使用Medline的经验),对原始病例报告的可访问性进行了检查并评估其命中率。原始数据的命中率为40-75%,并将数据分为高命中率组和低命中率组。命中率低的一个主要原因是没有利用“爆炸”功能来延长不良影响的期限。因此,“爆炸”功能被发现是有效使用Medline的一个重要因素,特别是当没有适当选择术语来检索有关不良反应的病例报告时。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of Medline Utility for the Retrieval of Case Reports of Drug Adverse Effects.
Database usage was evaluated regarding the retrieval of drug-induced adverse effect case reports. A search of case reports was performed using the on-line Medline (Ovid). Forty case reports were extracted from “Reactions” (adis INTERNATIONAL) used as secondary literature on adverse effects. From the original titles and abstracts, the name of the drugs and adverse effects were translated into Japanease and used to search data sets. After 6 pharmacists received a 30-minute explanation on how to use Medline since they had no previous experience in using Medline at the time of this study, the accessibility to the original case reports was examined and evaluated for their hitting rates. The hitting rates of the original data were 40-75%, and the data was divided into high-rate and low-rate groups. A major cause of a low hitting rate was that the “explode” function was not utilized to extend the terms of adverse effects. As a result, the “explode” function was found to be an important factor in effectively using Medline, especially when terms are not adequately chosen to retrieve case reports on adverse effects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信