哥特主权:洪都拉斯街头帮派与治国之道

IF 0.9 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY
William Yaworsky
{"title":"哥特主权:洪都拉斯街头帮派与治国之道","authors":"William Yaworsky","doi":"10.1080/00664677.2023.2220932","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"behoves him to acknowledge that white people are – like all of us – subject to epistemic blindness that shields options and possibilities from view (Mignolo 2011; Sousanis 2015). Indeed, Ailton observes the concentration of wealth and power means that the revolutionary politics that might have overthrown broken systems in the past ‘no longer makes sense today’ (5). Without questioning the urgent need for change as Ailton describes, there is an absence of acknowledgement that we are trapped, as he himself points out, in a world where it is ‘becoming impossible to orient ourselves toward treading lightly on the Earth’ (49) or resist forces which compel us not to. One might suggest that white people are not ‘horrified’ by the idea of a better world but rather struggle to imagine another world or politics. It is telling in this sense that a key prescription for overcomingWestern ways of thinking is in ‘dreaming’ as an institution; a form of radical imagination that is both experiential and shared – one cannot do this on one’s own. This book is a polemic on the ravages of Western modernity, global capitalism and consumerist delusions. There are passages of truly beautiful writing, especially Ailton’s personal reflections on the profundity of not only his own peoples’ knowledge but Indigenous knowledges globally. The central message of this book is that life is not something to make use of, but rather something beautiful and intricately relational.","PeriodicalId":45505,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Forum","volume":"34 1","pages":"148 - 151"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gothic Sovereignty: Street Gangs and Statecraft in Honduras\",\"authors\":\"William Yaworsky\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00664677.2023.2220932\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"behoves him to acknowledge that white people are – like all of us – subject to epistemic blindness that shields options and possibilities from view (Mignolo 2011; Sousanis 2015). Indeed, Ailton observes the concentration of wealth and power means that the revolutionary politics that might have overthrown broken systems in the past ‘no longer makes sense today’ (5). Without questioning the urgent need for change as Ailton describes, there is an absence of acknowledgement that we are trapped, as he himself points out, in a world where it is ‘becoming impossible to orient ourselves toward treading lightly on the Earth’ (49) or resist forces which compel us not to. One might suggest that white people are not ‘horrified’ by the idea of a better world but rather struggle to imagine another world or politics. It is telling in this sense that a key prescription for overcomingWestern ways of thinking is in ‘dreaming’ as an institution; a form of radical imagination that is both experiential and shared – one cannot do this on one’s own. This book is a polemic on the ravages of Western modernity, global capitalism and consumerist delusions. There are passages of truly beautiful writing, especially Ailton’s personal reflections on the profundity of not only his own peoples’ knowledge but Indigenous knowledges globally. The central message of this book is that life is not something to make use of, but rather something beautiful and intricately relational.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45505,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Anthropological Forum\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 151\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Anthropological Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2023.2220932\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Forum","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00664677.2023.2220932","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

他应该承认白人——像我们所有人一样——受制于认知盲目性,这种盲目性屏蔽了选择和可能性(Mignolo 2011;Sousanis 2015)。的确,Ailton观察财富和权力的集中意味着革命政治可能推翻破碎系统过去的今天不再是有意义的(5)。没有质疑迫切需要改变Ailton描述,有一个没有承认我们被困,正如他指出的那样,在这个世界上,它是“成为不可能使自己小心地走在地球上”(49)或抵抗力量迫使我们不要。有人可能会说,白人并没有被一个更美好的世界的想法“吓坏”,而是在努力想象另一个世界或政治。从这个意义上说,克服西方思维方式的关键处方是“梦想”成为一种制度;这是一种既具有经验又具有共享性的激进想象——一个人无法独自做到这一点。这本书是对西方现代性的破坏、全球资本主义和消费主义错觉的一场论战。书中有几段文字非常优美,尤其是艾尔顿对自己民族知识的深刻思考,以及对全球土著知识的深刻思考。这本书的中心思想是,生命不是用来利用的东西,而是一种美丽而复杂的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Gothic Sovereignty: Street Gangs and Statecraft in Honduras
behoves him to acknowledge that white people are – like all of us – subject to epistemic blindness that shields options and possibilities from view (Mignolo 2011; Sousanis 2015). Indeed, Ailton observes the concentration of wealth and power means that the revolutionary politics that might have overthrown broken systems in the past ‘no longer makes sense today’ (5). Without questioning the urgent need for change as Ailton describes, there is an absence of acknowledgement that we are trapped, as he himself points out, in a world where it is ‘becoming impossible to orient ourselves toward treading lightly on the Earth’ (49) or resist forces which compel us not to. One might suggest that white people are not ‘horrified’ by the idea of a better world but rather struggle to imagine another world or politics. It is telling in this sense that a key prescription for overcomingWestern ways of thinking is in ‘dreaming’ as an institution; a form of radical imagination that is both experiential and shared – one cannot do this on one’s own. This book is a polemic on the ravages of Western modernity, global capitalism and consumerist delusions. There are passages of truly beautiful writing, especially Ailton’s personal reflections on the profundity of not only his own peoples’ knowledge but Indigenous knowledges globally. The central message of this book is that life is not something to make use of, but rather something beautiful and intricately relational.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Anthropological Forum
Anthropological Forum ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Anthropological Forum is a journal of social anthropology and comparative sociology that was founded in 1963 and has a distinguished publication history. The journal provides a forum for both established and innovative approaches to anthropological research. A special section devoted to contributions on applied anthropology appears periodically. The editors are especially keen to publish new approaches based on ethnographic and theoretical work in the journal"s established areas of strength: Australian culture and society, Aboriginal Australia, Southeast Asia and the Pacific.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信