{"title":"修正与反思:在本科交际课程中,APA风格的评估如何在两个评估周期中演变","authors":"A. Gaffney","doi":"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.5.2.0148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study presents one undergraduate program’s analysis of a writing- centered learning outcome, operationalized in terms of American Psychological Association (APA) style, using a standardized rubric. The analysis of data from year one revealed several problematic areas. The rubric was revised and the same outcome was analyzed again the following year. Data from year two demonstrated improvement, but also revealed a different set of concerns. Ultimately, the process proved useful for assessing student writing and making revisions as a result.","PeriodicalId":56185,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","volume":"14 1","pages":"148 - 167"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revising and Reflecting: How Assessment of APA Style Evolved Over Two Assessment Cycles in an Undergraduate Communication Program\",\"authors\":\"A. Gaffney\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.5.2.0148\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study presents one undergraduate program’s analysis of a writing- centered learning outcome, operationalized in terms of American Psychological Association (APA) style, using a standardized rubric. The analysis of data from year one revealed several problematic areas. The rubric was revised and the same outcome was analyzed again the following year. Data from year two demonstrated improvement, but also revealed a different set of concerns. Ultimately, the process proved useful for assessing student writing and making revisions as a result.\",\"PeriodicalId\":56185,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"volume\":\"14 1\",\"pages\":\"148 - 167\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.5.2.0148\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/JASSEINSTEFFE.5.2.0148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Revising and Reflecting: How Assessment of APA Style Evolved Over Two Assessment Cycles in an Undergraduate Communication Program
This study presents one undergraduate program’s analysis of a writing- centered learning outcome, operationalized in terms of American Psychological Association (APA) style, using a standardized rubric. The analysis of data from year one revealed several problematic areas. The rubric was revised and the same outcome was analyzed again the following year. Data from year two demonstrated improvement, but also revealed a different set of concerns. Ultimately, the process proved useful for assessing student writing and making revisions as a result.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Assessment and Institutional Effectiveness publishes scholarly work on the assessment of student learning at the course, program, institutional, and multi-institutional levels as well as more broadly focused scholarship on institutional effectiveness in relation to mission and emerging directions in higher education assessment. JAIE is the official publication of the New England Educational Assessment Network, established in 1995 and recognized as one of the leaders in supporting best practices and resources in educational assessment.