α -硫辛酸对大鼠坐骨神经挤压损伤后神经组织愈合的影响

A. M. Res, M. Yucel, O. Aktas, O. Zengi, A. Tas, A. Tufan, B. Eren, Feyza Karagoz, Guzey
{"title":"α -硫辛酸对大鼠坐骨神经挤压损伤后神经组织愈合的影响","authors":"A. M. Res, M. Yucel, O. Aktas, O. Zengi, A. Tas, A. Tufan, B. Eren, Feyza Karagoz, Guzey","doi":"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.02.061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Crush injury damages the nerve, affects its function and causes oxidative stress. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is an antioxidant agent with protective effects on the nerve tissue. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of ALA in the treatment of crush sciatic nerve injury in rats. Materials and Methods: Forty rats were divided into five groups. Walking Track Analysis (WTA) was performed in all groups before sacrificing the sciatic nerve. In group I (sham group), the sciatic nerve was exposed but not crushed, whereas in group II (early control group, 24th hour), group III (late control group, 7th day), group IV (early experimental group, 24th hour), and group V (late control group, 7th day), the sciatic nerve was exposed and clipped with an aneurysm clip for 300 seconds. One hour after the crush injury, subjects in groups II and III were given saline (2.5 ml, intraperitoneally), while ALA (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) was administered in Groups IV and V. WTA was performed in Groups I, II, and IV at the 24th hour after clipping and was performed in Groups III and V at 7th day after clipping. In all groups, the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) was calculated after WTA. Following the completion of WTA, sciatic nerve tissue samples were obtained for the measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and catalase (CAT) enzyme values. Results: The SFI scores in groups II, III, IV, and V were significantly lower than that of sham group (p˂0.05), while no significant difference was found between groups II and IV and between groups III and V (p>0.05). The CAT values of groups II and IV, the GSH-Px value and MDA value of group IV, and the SOD values of groups II and IV were found to be significantly higher than those of sham group (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found among groups I, III, and V with regard to CAT, GSH-Px, MDA and SOD values (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results indicated that a single dose of ALA (100 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally one hour after the sciatic nerve crush injury had no therapeutic efficacy at 24 hours and 7 days after the administration. Further experimental studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of ALA applied in several doses rather than a single dose in crush peripheral nerve injury models.","PeriodicalId":8248,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Medical Research","volume":"45 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effect of Alpha-Lipoic Acid on nerve tissue healing after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats\",\"authors\":\"A. M. Res, M. Yucel, O. Aktas, O. Zengi, A. Tas, A. Tufan, B. Eren, Feyza Karagoz, Guzey\",\"doi\":\"10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.02.061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Crush injury damages the nerve, affects its function and causes oxidative stress. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is an antioxidant agent with protective effects on the nerve tissue. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of ALA in the treatment of crush sciatic nerve injury in rats. Materials and Methods: Forty rats were divided into five groups. Walking Track Analysis (WTA) was performed in all groups before sacrificing the sciatic nerve. In group I (sham group), the sciatic nerve was exposed but not crushed, whereas in group II (early control group, 24th hour), group III (late control group, 7th day), group IV (early experimental group, 24th hour), and group V (late control group, 7th day), the sciatic nerve was exposed and clipped with an aneurysm clip for 300 seconds. One hour after the crush injury, subjects in groups II and III were given saline (2.5 ml, intraperitoneally), while ALA (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) was administered in Groups IV and V. WTA was performed in Groups I, II, and IV at the 24th hour after clipping and was performed in Groups III and V at 7th day after clipping. In all groups, the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) was calculated after WTA. Following the completion of WTA, sciatic nerve tissue samples were obtained for the measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and catalase (CAT) enzyme values. Results: The SFI scores in groups II, III, IV, and V were significantly lower than that of sham group (p˂0.05), while no significant difference was found between groups II and IV and between groups III and V (p>0.05). The CAT values of groups II and IV, the GSH-Px value and MDA value of group IV, and the SOD values of groups II and IV were found to be significantly higher than those of sham group (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found among groups I, III, and V with regard to CAT, GSH-Px, MDA and SOD values (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results indicated that a single dose of ALA (100 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally one hour after the sciatic nerve crush injury had no therapeutic efficacy at 24 hours and 7 days after the administration. Further experimental studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of ALA applied in several doses rather than a single dose in crush peripheral nerve injury models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8248,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Medical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.02.061\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Medical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5455/annalsmedres.2023.02.061","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

背景:挤压损伤损伤神经,影响其功能并引起氧化应激。α -硫辛酸(ALA)是一种抗氧化剂,对神经组织有保护作用。本研究旨在探讨ALA对大鼠坐骨神经挤压性损伤的治疗作用。材料与方法:40只大鼠分为5组。各组在牺牲坐骨神经前行步行轨迹分析(WTA)。ⅰ组(假手术组)暴露坐骨神经,不压碎;ⅱ组(早期对照组,24小时)、ⅲ组(晚期对照组,7天)、ⅳ组(早期实验组,24小时)、ⅴ组(晚期对照组,7天)暴露坐骨神经,用动脉瘤夹夹住坐骨神经300秒。压伤后1小时,II、III组给予生理盐水(2.5 ml,腹腔),IV、V组给予ALA (100 mg/kg,腹腔),I、II、IV组于夹持后24小时进行WTA, III、V组于夹持后第7天进行WTA。在所有组中,WTA后计算坐骨功能指数(SFI)。WTA完成后,取坐骨神经组织标本测定丙二醛(MDA)、超氧化物歧化酶(SOD)、谷胱甘肽过氧化物酶(GSH-Px)和过氧化氢酶(CAT)酶值。结果:II、III、IV、V组SFI评分均显著低于假手术组(p小于0.05),而II组与IV组、III组与V组之间无显著差异(p>0.05)。II、IV组的CAT值、IV组的GSH-Px值、MDA值以及II、IV组的SOD值均显著高于假手术组(p0.05)。结论:坐骨神经压伤后1 h腹腔注射单剂量ALA (100 mg/kg), 24 h和7 d均无治疗效果。需要进一步的实验研究来评估ALA在挤压周围神经损伤模型中应用多剂量而不是单剂量的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The effect of Alpha-Lipoic Acid on nerve tissue healing after sciatic nerve crush injury in rats
Background: Crush injury damages the nerve, affects its function and causes oxidative stress. Alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) is an antioxidant agent with protective effects on the nerve tissue. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effects of ALA in the treatment of crush sciatic nerve injury in rats. Materials and Methods: Forty rats were divided into five groups. Walking Track Analysis (WTA) was performed in all groups before sacrificing the sciatic nerve. In group I (sham group), the sciatic nerve was exposed but not crushed, whereas in group II (early control group, 24th hour), group III (late control group, 7th day), group IV (early experimental group, 24th hour), and group V (late control group, 7th day), the sciatic nerve was exposed and clipped with an aneurysm clip for 300 seconds. One hour after the crush injury, subjects in groups II and III were given saline (2.5 ml, intraperitoneally), while ALA (100 mg/kg, intraperitoneally) was administered in Groups IV and V. WTA was performed in Groups I, II, and IV at the 24th hour after clipping and was performed in Groups III and V at 7th day after clipping. In all groups, the Sciatic Functional Index (SFI) was calculated after WTA. Following the completion of WTA, sciatic nerve tissue samples were obtained for the measurement of malondialdehyde (MDA), superoxide dismutase (SOD), glutathione peroxidase (GSH-Px) and catalase (CAT) enzyme values. Results: The SFI scores in groups II, III, IV, and V were significantly lower than that of sham group (p˂0.05), while no significant difference was found between groups II and IV and between groups III and V (p>0.05). The CAT values of groups II and IV, the GSH-Px value and MDA value of group IV, and the SOD values of groups II and IV were found to be significantly higher than those of sham group (p<0.05). However, no significant difference was found among groups I, III, and V with regard to CAT, GSH-Px, MDA and SOD values (p>0.05). Conclusion: The results indicated that a single dose of ALA (100 mg/kg) administered intraperitoneally one hour after the sciatic nerve crush injury had no therapeutic efficacy at 24 hours and 7 days after the administration. Further experimental studies are needed to evaluate the effectiveness of ALA applied in several doses rather than a single dose in crush peripheral nerve injury models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信