面向社会导航的ROS局部轨迹规划算法性能评价

Q2 Arts and Humanities
F. Pimentel, P. Aquino
{"title":"面向社会导航的ROS局部轨迹规划算法性能评价","authors":"F. Pimentel, P. Aquino","doi":"10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.","PeriodicalId":36690,"journal":{"name":"Platonic Investigations","volume":"144 1","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of ROS Local Trajectory Planning Algorithms to Social Navigation\",\"authors\":\"F. Pimentel, P. Aquino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Platonic Investigations\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"156-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Platonic Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Platonic Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

准确性和安全性是社会导航的必要特征,但仍然是一个挑战。ROS导航堆栈(RNS)允许通过插件进行导航的本地路径规划方法的变化。本文将对这些方法进行比较,这些方法直接关系到机器人的安全性和自然性。因此,通过改变传感器和模拟环境,比较了四种不同的方法。每个组合使用每种方法的标准参数进行1000次实验,共24000次实验。本文得出的结论是,Elastic Band (EBand)方法比参与RoboCup@home的多个机器人常用的动态窗口方法(Dynamic window approach, DWA)更具安全性和准确性,因此更适合社交导航——在某些情况下达到90%的准确率,碰撞率低于5%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Performance Evaluation of ROS Local Trajectory Planning Algorithms to Social Navigation
Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Platonic Investigations
Platonic Investigations Arts and Humanities-Philosophy
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信