{"title":"面向社会导航的ROS局部轨迹规划算法性能评价","authors":"F. Pimentel, P. Aquino","doi":"10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.","PeriodicalId":36690,"journal":{"name":"Platonic Investigations","volume":"144 1","pages":"156-161"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Evaluation of ROS Local Trajectory Planning Algorithms to Social Navigation\",\"authors\":\"F. Pimentel, P. Aquino\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36690,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Platonic Investigations\",\"volume\":\"144 1\",\"pages\":\"156-161\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Platonic Investigations\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Platonic Investigations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LARS-SBR-WRE48964.2019.00035","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5
摘要
准确性和安全性是社会导航的必要特征,但仍然是一个挑战。ROS导航堆栈(RNS)允许通过插件进行导航的本地路径规划方法的变化。本文将对这些方法进行比较,这些方法直接关系到机器人的安全性和自然性。因此,通过改变传感器和模拟环境,比较了四种不同的方法。每个组合使用每种方法的标准参数进行1000次实验,共24000次实验。本文得出的结论是,Elastic Band (EBand)方法比参与RoboCup@home的多个机器人常用的动态窗口方法(Dynamic window approach, DWA)更具安全性和准确性,因此更适合社交导航——在某些情况下达到90%的准确率,碰撞率低于5%。
Performance Evaluation of ROS Local Trajectory Planning Algorithms to Social Navigation
Accuracy and safety are necessary characteristics in social navigation and still constitute a challenge. The ROS Navigation Stack (RNS) allows the variation of local path planning methods through plugins for navigation. This paper brings you the comparison of those methods, which are directly connected with the safety and naturalness of the robot. Therefore, four different methods were compared by varying the sensors and the simulated environment. A thousand experiments were performed for each combination using the standard parameters of each method in a total of 24000 experiments. This paper concluded that the Elastic Band (EBand) method presents more safety and accuracy than the Dynamic window approach (DWA), method commonly used in several robots that participate in RoboCup@home, so it is more suitable for social navigation - reaching 90% accuracy in some cases and collision rate below 5%.