重建近似对话

D. Shapiro
{"title":"重建近似对话","authors":"D. Shapiro","doi":"10.1111/J.2044-8260.1976.TB00045.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fifteen undergraduate subjects attempted to reconstruct, following Clarke's (1975) procedure, four approximations to dialogue generated by Pease (1972a). Subjects displayed significant (P < 0.001) ability to locate utterances by the dialoguing participant immediately following the correct utterance by the monologuing participant, but not vice versa. Subjects did no better than chance in reconstructing the sequence of utterances by either participant alone. Methodological and theoretical implications are discussed, with reference to the predominant strategy apparently followed by subjects.","PeriodicalId":76614,"journal":{"name":"The British journal of social and clinical psychology","volume":"6 1","pages":"353-356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1976-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reconstructing Approximations to Dialogue\",\"authors\":\"D. Shapiro\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/J.2044-8260.1976.TB00045.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fifteen undergraduate subjects attempted to reconstruct, following Clarke's (1975) procedure, four approximations to dialogue generated by Pease (1972a). Subjects displayed significant (P < 0.001) ability to locate utterances by the dialoguing participant immediately following the correct utterance by the monologuing participant, but not vice versa. Subjects did no better than chance in reconstructing the sequence of utterances by either participant alone. Methodological and theoretical implications are discussed, with reference to the predominant strategy apparently followed by subjects.\",\"PeriodicalId\":76614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The British journal of social and clinical psychology\",\"volume\":\"6 1\",\"pages\":\"353-356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1976-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The British journal of social and clinical psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8260.1976.TB00045.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The British journal of social and clinical psychology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/J.2044-8260.1976.TB00045.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

15名本科生试图按照Clarke(1975)的程序,重构Pease (1972a)生成的四种近似对话。受试者表现出显著(P < 0.001)的能力,能够在独白参与者说出正确话语后立即定位对话参与者的话语,反之则不然。被试在重建任何一个参与者单独说话的顺序上都没有比机会更好。讨论了方法和理论含义,并参考了受试者明显遵循的主要策略。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Reconstructing Approximations to Dialogue
Fifteen undergraduate subjects attempted to reconstruct, following Clarke's (1975) procedure, four approximations to dialogue generated by Pease (1972a). Subjects displayed significant (P < 0.001) ability to locate utterances by the dialoguing participant immediately following the correct utterance by the monologuing participant, but not vice versa. Subjects did no better than chance in reconstructing the sequence of utterances by either participant alone. Methodological and theoretical implications are discussed, with reference to the predominant strategy apparently followed by subjects.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信