美国农业部质量等级和内部温度不同的牛排的热物理特性

M. S. Hernandez, Jessie T McClennan, S. Martini, K. Allen, H. Ban, J. Legako
{"title":"美国农业部质量等级和内部温度不同的牛排的热物理特性","authors":"M. S. Hernandez, Jessie T McClennan, S. Martini, K. Allen, H. Ban, J. Legako","doi":"10.22175/mmb.13900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of quality grade and internal temperature on the thermophysical properties of beef strip steaks. Beef strip loins (n=24) were collected from USDA Prime (PR), Low Choice (LC), and Standard (ST) carcasses. Strip loins were fabricated into 2.54 cm steaks at 21 d postmortem and randomly assigned to an internal temperature (4, 25, 55, 60, 71, 77°C). Steaks were subjected to various thermal and physical property measurements. No quality grade × internal temperature interaction was observed for diffusivity and conductivity (P > 0.05). Steaks tempered to 25°C had the greatest conductivity compared to all other internal temperature treatments (P = 0.021). A quality grade × internal temperature interaction was observed for center myosin and sarcoplasmic protein enthalpy values (P < 0.001). Raw (4 and 25°C) ST steaks had lower enthalpy values compared to raw PR and LC steaks (P < 0.05). Raw steaks had greater surface myosin and both center and surface actin enthalpy values (P < 0.05). A quality grade × internal temperature was observed for surface and center viscoelasticity (P < 0.05). Raw steaks were less viscoelastic compared to cooked steaks, regardless of quality grade (P < 0.05). Quality grade and internal temperature impacted expressible moisture and water holding capacity (P ≤ 0.001). ST steaks possessed increased expressible moisture and water holding capacity compared to LC and PR steaks (P < 0.05). A quality grade × internal temperature was observed for Warner-Bratzler shear force and springiness (P ≤ 0.008). DOD impacted all texture profile analysis attributes (P < 0.05). PR steaks were more cohesive than ST steaks (P = 0.011). These data show that final internal temperature and intramuscular fat content impact thermophysical properties of beef steaks.","PeriodicalId":18316,"journal":{"name":"Meat and Muscle Biology","volume":"19 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thermophysical properties of beef steaks varying in USDA quality grade and internal temperature\",\"authors\":\"M. S. Hernandez, Jessie T McClennan, S. Martini, K. Allen, H. Ban, J. Legako\",\"doi\":\"10.22175/mmb.13900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of quality grade and internal temperature on the thermophysical properties of beef strip steaks. Beef strip loins (n=24) were collected from USDA Prime (PR), Low Choice (LC), and Standard (ST) carcasses. Strip loins were fabricated into 2.54 cm steaks at 21 d postmortem and randomly assigned to an internal temperature (4, 25, 55, 60, 71, 77°C). Steaks were subjected to various thermal and physical property measurements. No quality grade × internal temperature interaction was observed for diffusivity and conductivity (P > 0.05). Steaks tempered to 25°C had the greatest conductivity compared to all other internal temperature treatments (P = 0.021). A quality grade × internal temperature interaction was observed for center myosin and sarcoplasmic protein enthalpy values (P < 0.001). Raw (4 and 25°C) ST steaks had lower enthalpy values compared to raw PR and LC steaks (P < 0.05). Raw steaks had greater surface myosin and both center and surface actin enthalpy values (P < 0.05). A quality grade × internal temperature was observed for surface and center viscoelasticity (P < 0.05). Raw steaks were less viscoelastic compared to cooked steaks, regardless of quality grade (P < 0.05). Quality grade and internal temperature impacted expressible moisture and water holding capacity (P ≤ 0.001). ST steaks possessed increased expressible moisture and water holding capacity compared to LC and PR steaks (P < 0.05). A quality grade × internal temperature was observed for Warner-Bratzler shear force and springiness (P ≤ 0.008). DOD impacted all texture profile analysis attributes (P < 0.05). PR steaks were more cohesive than ST steaks (P = 0.011). These data show that final internal temperature and intramuscular fat content impact thermophysical properties of beef steaks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18316,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Meat and Muscle Biology\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Meat and Muscle Biology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.13900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Meat and Muscle Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22175/mmb.13900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本研究的目的是确定质量等级和内部温度对牛肉条牛排热物理性质的影响。牛里脊肉(n=24)分别取自美国农业部优质(PR)、低选择(LC)和标准(ST)胴体。在死后第21天,将里脊肉制成2.54厘米的牛排,并随机分配内部温度(4、25、55、60、71、77℃)。牛排要经受各种热性能和物理性能的测量。扩散率和电导率不存在质量等级与内部温度的交互作用(P > 0.05)。与所有其他内部温度处理相比,回火至25°C的牛排电导率最高(P = 0.021)。中心肌球蛋白和肌浆蛋白焓值存在质量等级×内部温度的相互作用(P < 0.001)。4°C和25°C的ST生牛排的焓值低于PR和LC生牛排(P < 0.05)。生牛排的表面肌凝蛋白、中心焓值和表面肌动蛋白焓值均高于对照组(P < 0.05)。表面和中心粘弹性均为质量级×内温(P < 0.05)。无论质量等级如何,生牛排的粘弹性均低于熟牛排(P < 0.05)。质量等级和内部温度影响可表达水分和保水能力(P≤0.001)。与LC和PR相比,ST牛排具有更高的表达水分和持水量(P < 0.05)。Warner-Bratzler剪切力和弹性为质量级×内温(P≤0.008)。DOD影响所有纹理轮廓分析属性(P < 0.05)。PR牛排的内聚性高于ST牛排(P = 0.011)。这些数据表明,最终内部温度和肌内脂肪含量影响牛排的热物理特性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thermophysical properties of beef steaks varying in USDA quality grade and internal temperature
The objectives of this study were to determine the influence of quality grade and internal temperature on the thermophysical properties of beef strip steaks. Beef strip loins (n=24) were collected from USDA Prime (PR), Low Choice (LC), and Standard (ST) carcasses. Strip loins were fabricated into 2.54 cm steaks at 21 d postmortem and randomly assigned to an internal temperature (4, 25, 55, 60, 71, 77°C). Steaks were subjected to various thermal and physical property measurements. No quality grade × internal temperature interaction was observed for diffusivity and conductivity (P > 0.05). Steaks tempered to 25°C had the greatest conductivity compared to all other internal temperature treatments (P = 0.021). A quality grade × internal temperature interaction was observed for center myosin and sarcoplasmic protein enthalpy values (P < 0.001). Raw (4 and 25°C) ST steaks had lower enthalpy values compared to raw PR and LC steaks (P < 0.05). Raw steaks had greater surface myosin and both center and surface actin enthalpy values (P < 0.05). A quality grade × internal temperature was observed for surface and center viscoelasticity (P < 0.05). Raw steaks were less viscoelastic compared to cooked steaks, regardless of quality grade (P < 0.05). Quality grade and internal temperature impacted expressible moisture and water holding capacity (P ≤ 0.001). ST steaks possessed increased expressible moisture and water holding capacity compared to LC and PR steaks (P < 0.05). A quality grade × internal temperature was observed for Warner-Bratzler shear force and springiness (P ≤ 0.008). DOD impacted all texture profile analysis attributes (P < 0.05). PR steaks were more cohesive than ST steaks (P = 0.011). These data show that final internal temperature and intramuscular fat content impact thermophysical properties of beef steaks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信