没有人的流动性:知识如何在远距离国际化的背景下流动?案例研究

IF 2.6 2区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Yun-fai. Yue, D. D. De Souza, L. Townsin
{"title":"没有人的流动性:知识如何在远距离国际化的背景下流动?案例研究","authors":"Yun-fai. Yue, D. D. De Souza, L. Townsin","doi":"10.1080/07294360.2023.2216643","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT\n The internationalisation of higher education has been challenged by the significant decline in international student mobility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of internationalisation at a distance before COVID-19 paved a new avenue for the internationalisation of higher education, with the distinctive feature of knowledge mobility without human mobility. However, few studies have explored knowledge mobility in an internationalisation at a distance context. The ethnographic case study identifies three knowledge mobility channels – Information and Communication Technology (ICT), curriculum and virtual community of practice – and argues that the knowledge creation model SECI (Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, and Internalisation) is inapplicable in the internationalisation at a distance context. Additionally, the absence of immersion in face-to-face interaction hinders internationalisation at a distance students’ identity construction, placing them at a disadvantage in acquiring tacit knowledge. The significance of cultural, linguistic and pedagogical contextualisation in the context is also emphasised.","PeriodicalId":48219,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education Research & Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"No human mobility: how is knowledge mobile in a context of internationalisation at a distance? a case study\",\"authors\":\"Yun-fai. Yue, D. D. De Souza, L. Townsin\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/07294360.2023.2216643\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT\\n The internationalisation of higher education has been challenged by the significant decline in international student mobility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of internationalisation at a distance before COVID-19 paved a new avenue for the internationalisation of higher education, with the distinctive feature of knowledge mobility without human mobility. However, few studies have explored knowledge mobility in an internationalisation at a distance context. The ethnographic case study identifies three knowledge mobility channels – Information and Communication Technology (ICT), curriculum and virtual community of practice – and argues that the knowledge creation model SECI (Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, and Internalisation) is inapplicable in the internationalisation at a distance context. Additionally, the absence of immersion in face-to-face interaction hinders internationalisation at a distance students’ identity construction, placing them at a disadvantage in acquiring tacit knowledge. The significance of cultural, linguistic and pedagogical contextualisation in the context is also emphasised.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48219,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Higher Education Research & Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Higher Education Research & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2216643\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education Research & Development","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2023.2216643","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

COVID-19大流行导致国际学生流动性显著下降,高等教育的国际化受到了挑战。新型冠状病毒感染症(COVID-19)前远距离国际化的出现,为高等教育国际化开辟了新的道路,其鲜明特征是知识的流动,而不是人的流动。然而,很少有研究探讨远程国际化背景下的知识流动。民族志案例研究确定了三种知识流动渠道——信息和通信技术(ICT)、课程和虚拟实践社区——并认为知识创造模型SECI(社会化、外部化、组合和内部化)不适用于远距离背景下的国际化。此外,缺乏面对面互动的沉浸感阻碍了远距离国际化学生的身份建构,使他们在获取隐性知识方面处于不利地位。文化、语言和教学语境化在语境中的重要性也被强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
No human mobility: how is knowledge mobile in a context of internationalisation at a distance? a case study
ABSTRACT The internationalisation of higher education has been challenged by the significant decline in international student mobility caused by the COVID-19 pandemic. The emergence of internationalisation at a distance before COVID-19 paved a new avenue for the internationalisation of higher education, with the distinctive feature of knowledge mobility without human mobility. However, few studies have explored knowledge mobility in an internationalisation at a distance context. The ethnographic case study identifies three knowledge mobility channels – Information and Communication Technology (ICT), curriculum and virtual community of practice – and argues that the knowledge creation model SECI (Socialisation, Externalisation, Combination, and Internalisation) is inapplicable in the internationalisation at a distance context. Additionally, the absence of immersion in face-to-face interaction hinders internationalisation at a distance students’ identity construction, placing them at a disadvantage in acquiring tacit knowledge. The significance of cultural, linguistic and pedagogical contextualisation in the context is also emphasised.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Higher Education Research & Development
Higher Education Research & Development EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
7.30
自引率
12.50%
发文量
86
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信