征服时期的民族志与智力

IF 4.6 3区 计算机科学 Q2 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS
Cameron B. Strang
{"title":"征服时期的民族志与智力","authors":"Cameron B. Strang","doi":"10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469640471.003.0005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter analyzes ethnographic writings about and by the diverse peoples of the Gulf South in the early 1800s. It argues that ethnography in the United States developed amid the encounters brought about by U.S. imperialism and defined contested hierarchies of mental ability that Anglo-Americans used to legitimate their supremacy. Many Anglo-Americans performed ethnographic observations during and after the United States’ conquest of the Gulf South that seemed to reinforce the hypothesis that nonwhites had inherently inferior brains and could never achieve equality in the nation’s political and intellectual communities. However, blacks, natives, creoles, and even a few Anglo-Americans used ethnography to challenge the new order that U.S. rule was making, and they tended to favor the increasingly old-fashioned perspective that all men were created equal.","PeriodicalId":12640,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers of Computer Science","volume":"25 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2018-08-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnography and Intelligence in the Time of Conquest\",\"authors\":\"Cameron B. Strang\",\"doi\":\"10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469640471.003.0005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter analyzes ethnographic writings about and by the diverse peoples of the Gulf South in the early 1800s. It argues that ethnography in the United States developed amid the encounters brought about by U.S. imperialism and defined contested hierarchies of mental ability that Anglo-Americans used to legitimate their supremacy. Many Anglo-Americans performed ethnographic observations during and after the United States’ conquest of the Gulf South that seemed to reinforce the hypothesis that nonwhites had inherently inferior brains and could never achieve equality in the nation’s political and intellectual communities. However, blacks, natives, creoles, and even a few Anglo-Americans used ethnography to challenge the new order that U.S. rule was making, and they tended to favor the increasingly old-fashioned perspective that all men were created equal.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12640,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Frontiers of Computer Science\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-08-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Frontiers of Computer Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"94\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469640471.003.0005\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"计算机科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers of Computer Science","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5149/NORTHCAROLINA/9781469640471.003.0005","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本章分析了19世纪早期关于墨西哥湾南部不同民族的民族志著作。它认为,美国的人种学是在美帝国主义带来的冲突中发展起来的,并定义了英美人用来证明其至高无上地位的有争议的智力等级。在美国征服南部海湾地区期间和之后,许多盎格鲁裔美国人进行了人种学观察,这似乎强化了一种假设,即非白人天生智力低下,永远无法在美国的政治和知识界实现平等。然而,黑人、原住民、克里奥尔人,甚至少数盎格鲁裔美国人,都用人种学来挑战美国统治所建立的新秩序,他们倾向于赞成越来越过时的观点,即人人生而平等。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnography and Intelligence in the Time of Conquest
This chapter analyzes ethnographic writings about and by the diverse peoples of the Gulf South in the early 1800s. It argues that ethnography in the United States developed amid the encounters brought about by U.S. imperialism and defined contested hierarchies of mental ability that Anglo-Americans used to legitimate their supremacy. Many Anglo-Americans performed ethnographic observations during and after the United States’ conquest of the Gulf South that seemed to reinforce the hypothesis that nonwhites had inherently inferior brains and could never achieve equality in the nation’s political and intellectual communities. However, blacks, natives, creoles, and even a few Anglo-Americans used ethnography to challenge the new order that U.S. rule was making, and they tended to favor the increasingly old-fashioned perspective that all men were created equal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Frontiers of Computer Science
Frontiers of Computer Science COMPUTER SCIENCE, INFORMATION SYSTEMS-COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
2.40%
发文量
799
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Frontiers of Computer Science aims to provide a forum for the publication of peer-reviewed papers to promote rapid communication and exchange between computer scientists. The journal publishes research papers and review articles in a wide range of topics, including: architecture, software, artificial intelligence, theoretical computer science, networks and communication, information systems, multimedia and graphics, information security, interdisciplinary, etc. The journal especially encourages papers from new emerging and multidisciplinary areas, as well as papers reflecting the international trends of research and development and on special topics reporting progress made by Chinese computer scientists.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信