Covid-19的居家限制如何影响犯罪?证据来自巴西的里约热内卢

Jessie Bullock , Ana Paula Pellegrino
{"title":"Covid-19的居家限制如何影响犯罪?证据来自巴西的里约热内卢","authors":"Jessie Bullock ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Pellegrino","doi":"10.1016/j.econ.2021.11.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>How do changes in mobility impact crime? Using police precinct-level daily crime statistics and shootings data from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, we estimate that extortion, theft, and robberies decrease by at least 41.6% following COVID-19 mandated stay-at-home orders and changes in mobility in March 2020. Conversely, we find no change in violent crimes, despite fewer people being on the streets. To address the relationship between crime and mobility, we use cellphone data and split the precincts into subgroups by pre-Covid-19-related restrictions mobility quintiles. We estimate a similar average decrease in extortion regardless of a precinct’s previous activity level, but find that the decrease in theft and robberies is substantially higher for the more mobile precincts while it disappears for the least mobile precincts. Using daily cellphone mobility data aggregated at the police precinct level, we find that changes in mobility while the stay-at-home order is in place only have a meaningful effect on robberies, which increase in likelihood when a precinct’s mobility ranking is higher than the previous day. Together, these results suggest that the stay-at-home order and associated decline in mobility strongly affected extortion and property crimes while not interfering with the dynamics of violent crime. These findings support the hypothesis that violent and property crime follow different dynamics, particularly where there is a bigger impact of organized criminal groups.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100389,"journal":{"name":"EconomiA","volume":"22 3","pages":"Pages 147-163"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000175/pdfft?md5=3be8499ef417064311caed5839ebfca9&pid=1-s2.0-S1517758021000175-main.pdf","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do Covid-19 stay-at-home restrictions affect crime? Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil\",\"authors\":\"Jessie Bullock ,&nbsp;Ana Paula Pellegrino\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.econ.2021.11.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>How do changes in mobility impact crime? Using police precinct-level daily crime statistics and shootings data from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, we estimate that extortion, theft, and robberies decrease by at least 41.6% following COVID-19 mandated stay-at-home orders and changes in mobility in March 2020. Conversely, we find no change in violent crimes, despite fewer people being on the streets. To address the relationship between crime and mobility, we use cellphone data and split the precincts into subgroups by pre-Covid-19-related restrictions mobility quintiles. We estimate a similar average decrease in extortion regardless of a precinct’s previous activity level, but find that the decrease in theft and robberies is substantially higher for the more mobile precincts while it disappears for the least mobile precincts. Using daily cellphone mobility data aggregated at the police precinct level, we find that changes in mobility while the stay-at-home order is in place only have a meaningful effect on robberies, which increase in likelihood when a precinct’s mobility ranking is higher than the previous day. Together, these results suggest that the stay-at-home order and associated decline in mobility strongly affected extortion and property crimes while not interfering with the dynamics of violent crime. These findings support the hypothesis that violent and property crime follow different dynamics, particularly where there is a bigger impact of organized criminal groups.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100389,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EconomiA\",\"volume\":\"22 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 147-163\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000175/pdfft?md5=3be8499ef417064311caed5839ebfca9&pid=1-s2.0-S1517758021000175-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EconomiA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EconomiA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1517758021000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

流动性的变化是如何影响犯罪的?根据巴西里约热内卢州的警察辖区级每日犯罪统计数据和枪击数据,我们估计,在2020年3月新冠肺炎疫情强制要求人们呆在家里并改变流动性之后,勒索、盗窃和抢劫至少减少了41.6%。相反,我们发现暴力犯罪没有变化,尽管街头的人数减少了。为了解决犯罪与流动性之间的关系,我们使用手机数据,并根据covid -19之前与流动性相关的限制五分位数将选区划分为子组。我们估计,无论一个选区以前的活动水平如何,敲诈勒索的平均下降幅度都差不多,但我们发现,在流动性较高的选区,盗窃和抢劫的下降幅度要高得多,而在流动性最低的选区,盗窃和抢劫的下降幅度则会消失。利用在警察辖区层面汇总的每日手机移动数据,我们发现,在保持在家秩序的情况下,移动的变化只对抢劫有意义的影响,当一个辖区的移动排名高于前一天时,抢劫的可能性就会增加。总之,这些结果表明,呆在家里的秩序和相关的流动性下降强烈地影响了勒索和财产犯罪,而不干扰暴力犯罪的动态。这些发现支持了一种假设,即暴力犯罪和财产犯罪遵循不同的动态,特别是在有组织犯罪集团影响更大的地方。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
How do Covid-19 stay-at-home restrictions affect crime? Evidence from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

How do changes in mobility impact crime? Using police precinct-level daily crime statistics and shootings data from the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, we estimate that extortion, theft, and robberies decrease by at least 41.6% following COVID-19 mandated stay-at-home orders and changes in mobility in March 2020. Conversely, we find no change in violent crimes, despite fewer people being on the streets. To address the relationship between crime and mobility, we use cellphone data and split the precincts into subgroups by pre-Covid-19-related restrictions mobility quintiles. We estimate a similar average decrease in extortion regardless of a precinct’s previous activity level, but find that the decrease in theft and robberies is substantially higher for the more mobile precincts while it disappears for the least mobile precincts. Using daily cellphone mobility data aggregated at the police precinct level, we find that changes in mobility while the stay-at-home order is in place only have a meaningful effect on robberies, which increase in likelihood when a precinct’s mobility ranking is higher than the previous day. Together, these results suggest that the stay-at-home order and associated decline in mobility strongly affected extortion and property crimes while not interfering with the dynamics of violent crime. These findings support the hypothesis that violent and property crime follow different dynamics, particularly where there is a bigger impact of organized criminal groups.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信