5.25%次氯酸钠和紫外线对聚乙烯醇硅氧烷和聚醚单相印模材料的体内消毒效果评价与比较

Neha Prakash, R. Srivastava, A. Pathak, U. Palekar, Vivek Choukse, Ankit A. Parmar
{"title":"5.25%次氯酸钠和紫外线对聚乙烯醇硅氧烷和聚醚单相印模材料的体内消毒效果评价与比较","authors":"Neha Prakash, R. Srivastava, A. Pathak, U. Palekar, Vivek Choukse, Ankit A. Parmar","doi":"10.18311/jpfa/2020/24453","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite, UV rays for disinfecting Polyether Monophase and Polyvinyl monophase impression material. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy dentulous subjects irrespective of gender were selected. For each dentulous subject four impressions of maxillary arch were made with Polyvinyl siloxane and Polyether monophase impression material. First impression was kept as control. Second impression was disinfected with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes. Third impression was disinfected by exposing it to UV light (A and B) for 3 minutes and fourth impression was disinfected by exposing it to UV light (A and B) for 10 minutes. The colony was observed based on standard method and technique under binocular microscope and the growth in broth were observed based on their turbidity with the help of colorimeter. Result: The intergroup comparison was done by using ANOVA test while the comparison between two groups was done by using paired t test. Conclusion: In this study sodium hypochlorite was found to be more effective in killing microorganisms than UV rays as it kills only surfaces microbes.","PeriodicalId":77222,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (Pierre Fauchard Academy. India Section)","volume":"43 1","pages":"1-8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy of 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite and UV Rays for Disinfecting Polyvinyl Siloxane and Polyether Monophase Impression Material: An in vivo Study\",\"authors\":\"Neha Prakash, R. Srivastava, A. Pathak, U. Palekar, Vivek Choukse, Ankit A. Parmar\",\"doi\":\"10.18311/jpfa/2020/24453\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite, UV rays for disinfecting Polyether Monophase and Polyvinyl monophase impression material. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy dentulous subjects irrespective of gender were selected. For each dentulous subject four impressions of maxillary arch were made with Polyvinyl siloxane and Polyether monophase impression material. First impression was kept as control. Second impression was disinfected with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes. Third impression was disinfected by exposing it to UV light (A and B) for 3 minutes and fourth impression was disinfected by exposing it to UV light (A and B) for 10 minutes. The colony was observed based on standard method and technique under binocular microscope and the growth in broth were observed based on their turbidity with the help of colorimeter. Result: The intergroup comparison was done by using ANOVA test while the comparison between two groups was done by using paired t test. Conclusion: In this study sodium hypochlorite was found to be more effective in killing microorganisms than UV rays as it kills only surfaces microbes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":77222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (Pierre Fauchard Academy. India Section)\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"1-8\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (Pierre Fauchard Academy. India Section)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2020/24453\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pierre Fauchard Academy (Pierre Fauchard Academy. India Section)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18311/jpfa/2020/24453","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:评价5.25%次氯酸钠和紫外线对聚醚单相和聚氯乙烯单相印模材料的消毒效果。材料与方法:选择健康无牙者10例,性别不限。每个有牙受试者用聚醚和聚乙烯硅氧烷单相印模材料制作上颌弓印模4个。第一印象作为对照。第二印痕用5.25%次氯酸钠消毒10分钟。第三印模用紫外线(A、B)照射消毒3分钟,第四印模用紫外线(A、B)照射消毒10分钟。用标准方法和技术在双目显微镜下观察菌落,用比色仪根据菌落浊度观察菌落在肉汤中的生长情况。结果:组间比较采用方差分析,两组间比较采用配对t检验。结论:在这项研究中,次氯酸钠被发现比紫外线更有效地杀死微生物,因为它只杀死表面的微生物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation and Comparison of Efficacy of 5.25% Sodium Hypochlorite and UV Rays for Disinfecting Polyvinyl Siloxane and Polyether Monophase Impression Material: An in vivo Study
Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of 5.25% Sodium hypochlorite, UV rays for disinfecting Polyether Monophase and Polyvinyl monophase impression material. Materials and Methods: Ten healthy dentulous subjects irrespective of gender were selected. For each dentulous subject four impressions of maxillary arch were made with Polyvinyl siloxane and Polyether monophase impression material. First impression was kept as control. Second impression was disinfected with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite for 10 minutes. Third impression was disinfected by exposing it to UV light (A and B) for 3 minutes and fourth impression was disinfected by exposing it to UV light (A and B) for 10 minutes. The colony was observed based on standard method and technique under binocular microscope and the growth in broth were observed based on their turbidity with the help of colorimeter. Result: The intergroup comparison was done by using ANOVA test while the comparison between two groups was done by using paired t test. Conclusion: In this study sodium hypochlorite was found to be more effective in killing microorganisms than UV rays as it kills only surfaces microbes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信