小组工作评估的注意标准

Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2021-07-03 DOI:10.1080/21501378.2021.1962117

C. Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder, Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor

{"title":"小组工作评估的注意标准","authors":"C. Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder, Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2021.1962117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work represent a collaborative effort between the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Associaton for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to address the distinctive aspects of group work assessment that group workers often overlook and may lead to ineffective or invalid assessment. Examples of these considerations include the overuse of one method of data collection (self-report) in group work assessment, the importance of using appropriate and culturally relevant assessments in groups with diverse members, and intentionally identifying the difference between assessing group process versus group outcomes. The committee’s goal was to develop standards that highlight the importance of pre-ferred practices in group work assessment and for counselors to use them in conjunction with other standards related to measurement and assessment in counseling.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"1 1","pages":"73 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work\",\"authors\":\"C. Bennett, Ashley J Blount, Jennifer Gerlach, Katy Schroeder, Clark D. Ausloos, Zachary D. Bloom, Kristopher M. Goodrich, K. M. Hollenbaugh, John J. Taylor\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2021.1962117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work represent a collaborative effort between the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Associaton for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to address the distinctive aspects of group work assessment that group workers often overlook and may lead to ineffective or invalid assessment. Examples of these considerations include the overuse of one method of data collection (self-report) in group work assessment, the importance of using appropriate and culturally relevant assessments in groups with diverse members, and intentionally identifying the difference between assessing group process versus group outcomes. The committee’s goal was to develop standards that highlight the importance of pre-ferred practices in group work assessment and for counselors to use them in conjunction with other standards related to measurement and assessment in counseling.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"73 - 78\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2021.1962117\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2021.1962117","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

摘要

小组工作评估护理标准代表了咨询评估与研究协会(AARC)和小组工作专家协会(ASGW)之间的合作成果。这些标准的目的是解决小组工作评估的不同方面，小组工作人员经常忽视，并可能导致无效或无效的评估。这些考虑的例子包括在小组工作评估中过度使用一种数据收集方法(自我报告)，在有不同成员的小组中使用适当的和文化相关的评估的重要性，以及有意识别评估小组过程与小组结果之间的差异。该委员会的目标是制定标准，突出小组工作评估中优先做法的重要性，并使辅导员能够将其与咨询中与测量和评估有关的其他标准结合起来使用。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work

Abstract The Standards of Care for Assessment in Group Work represent a collaborative effort between the Association for Assessment and Research in Counseling (AARC) and the Associaton for Specialists in Group Work (ASGW). The purpose of these standards is to address the distinctive aspects of group work assessment that group workers often overlook and may lead to ineffective or invalid assessment. Examples of these considerations include the overuse of one method of data collection (self-report) in group work assessment, the importance of using appropriate and culturally relevant assessments in groups with diverse members, and intentionally identifying the difference between assessing group process versus group outcomes. The committee’s goal was to develop standards that highlight the importance of pre-ferred practices in group work assessment and for counselors to use them in conjunction with other standards related to measurement and assessment in counseling.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.