超越思想的极限:策兰、海德格尔与弯曲的艺术之路

IF 0.1 4区 文学 0 LITERATURE
ARCADIA Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1515/arcadia-2022-9057
Asif Rahamim
{"title":"超越思想的极限:策兰、海德格尔与弯曲的艺术之路","authors":"Asif Rahamim","doi":"10.1515/arcadia-2022-9057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this article I contend that Paul Celan’s poem, “Todtnauberg,” written as a follow up to his visit to Martin Heidegger’s Berghütte, should be read not only as a challenge to Heideggerian philosophy’s fundamental assumptions – primarily the notion of dwelling in the world via poetic language – but also to the very structure of philosophical thought, with its biases and inadequacies. Drawing on Celan’s idiosyncratic use of the term Verjudung I show its centrality in understanding the poem’s deconstructive move, as it applied to the binaries inherent to Heideggerian thought: pure/impure, indigenous/foreign, rooted/uprooted, and authentic/inauthentic. Posing the deconstructive qualities of the poetic against the crude decisiveness of philosophical thought, I argue that “Todtnauberg” ‘catches’ Heideggerian thought unprepared, as it presents it with its own blind spots, misconceptions, and loose ends, and thus rattles the very ground in which it seeks to ground itself.","PeriodicalId":43010,"journal":{"name":"ARCADIA","volume":"48 1","pages":"240 - 266"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beyond Thought’s Limits: Celan, Heidegger, and the Crooked Path of Art\",\"authors\":\"Asif Rahamim\",\"doi\":\"10.1515/arcadia-2022-9057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract In this article I contend that Paul Celan’s poem, “Todtnauberg,” written as a follow up to his visit to Martin Heidegger’s Berghütte, should be read not only as a challenge to Heideggerian philosophy’s fundamental assumptions – primarily the notion of dwelling in the world via poetic language – but also to the very structure of philosophical thought, with its biases and inadequacies. Drawing on Celan’s idiosyncratic use of the term Verjudung I show its centrality in understanding the poem’s deconstructive move, as it applied to the binaries inherent to Heideggerian thought: pure/impure, indigenous/foreign, rooted/uprooted, and authentic/inauthentic. Posing the deconstructive qualities of the poetic against the crude decisiveness of philosophical thought, I argue that “Todtnauberg” ‘catches’ Heideggerian thought unprepared, as it presents it with its own blind spots, misconceptions, and loose ends, and thus rattles the very ground in which it seeks to ground itself.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43010,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ARCADIA\",\"volume\":\"48 1\",\"pages\":\"240 - 266\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ARCADIA\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2022-9057\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ARCADIA","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/arcadia-2022-9057","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我认为保罗·策兰的诗《Todtnauberg》,是他访问马丁·海德格尔(Martin Heidegger)的bergh之后写的,不仅应该作为对海德格尔哲学基本假设的挑战——主要是通过诗歌语言居住在世界上的概念——而且应该作为对哲学思想结构的挑战,其偏见和不足之处。根据策兰对“判断”一词的特殊使用,我展示了它在理解这首诗的解构运动中的中心地位,因为它适用于海德格尔思想固有的二元对立:纯粹/不纯粹,本土/外来,扎根/连根拔起,真实/不真实。我把诗歌的解构特质与哲学思想的粗陋果断对立起来,认为“托特纳伯格”毫无准备地“抓住”了海德格尔思想,因为它给海德格尔思想带来了自己的盲点、误解和松散的目标,从而动摇了它试图立足的基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beyond Thought’s Limits: Celan, Heidegger, and the Crooked Path of Art
Abstract In this article I contend that Paul Celan’s poem, “Todtnauberg,” written as a follow up to his visit to Martin Heidegger’s Berghütte, should be read not only as a challenge to Heideggerian philosophy’s fundamental assumptions – primarily the notion of dwelling in the world via poetic language – but also to the very structure of philosophical thought, with its biases and inadequacies. Drawing on Celan’s idiosyncratic use of the term Verjudung I show its centrality in understanding the poem’s deconstructive move, as it applied to the binaries inherent to Heideggerian thought: pure/impure, indigenous/foreign, rooted/uprooted, and authentic/inauthentic. Posing the deconstructive qualities of the poetic against the crude decisiveness of philosophical thought, I argue that “Todtnauberg” ‘catches’ Heideggerian thought unprepared, as it presents it with its own blind spots, misconceptions, and loose ends, and thus rattles the very ground in which it seeks to ground itself.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ARCADIA
ARCADIA LITERATURE-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: arcadia provides a forum for internationally comparative studies that deal with literatures and liberal arts from all parts of the world. Current theories associated with these literatures and liberal arts are discussed. arcadia includes the columns: essays, miscellanea, reviews, submitted works and news.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信