调查celpip -一般阅读测试和加拿大语言基准之间的一致性:一项内容验证研究

IF 0.5 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS
Michelle Y. Chen, Jennifer J. Flasko
{"title":"调查celpip -一般阅读测试和加拿大语言基准之间的一致性:一项内容验证研究","authors":"Michelle Y. Chen, Jennifer J. Flasko","doi":"10.37213/cjal.2020.30649","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n\n\nSeeking evidence to support content validity is essential to test validation. This is especially the case in contexts where test scores are interpreted in relation to external proficiency standards and where new test content is constantly being produced to meet test administration and security demands. In this paper, we describe a modified scale- anchoring approach to assessing the alignment between the Canadian English Language Proficiency Index Program (CELPIP) test and the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB), the proficiency framework to which the test scores are linked. We discuss how proficiency frameworks such as the CLB can be used to support the content validation of large-scale standardized tests through an evaluation of the alignment between the test content and the performance standards. By sharing both the positive implications and challenges of working with the CLB in high-stakes language test validation, we hope to help raise the profile of this national language framework among scholars and practitioners.\n\n\n","PeriodicalId":43961,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigating the Alignment Between the CELPIP-General Reading Test and the Canadian Language Benchmarks: A Content Validation Study\",\"authors\":\"Michelle Y. Chen, Jennifer J. Flasko\",\"doi\":\"10.37213/cjal.2020.30649\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n\\n\\nSeeking evidence to support content validity is essential to test validation. This is especially the case in contexts where test scores are interpreted in relation to external proficiency standards and where new test content is constantly being produced to meet test administration and security demands. In this paper, we describe a modified scale- anchoring approach to assessing the alignment between the Canadian English Language Proficiency Index Program (CELPIP) test and the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB), the proficiency framework to which the test scores are linked. We discuss how proficiency frameworks such as the CLB can be used to support the content validation of large-scale standardized tests through an evaluation of the alignment between the test content and the performance standards. By sharing both the positive implications and challenges of working with the CLB in high-stakes language test validation, we hope to help raise the profile of this national language framework among scholars and practitioners.\\n\\n\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2020.30649\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37213/cjal.2020.30649","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

寻找证据来支持内容的有效性是检验有效性的关键。在考试成绩与外部熟练程度标准相关的情况下,以及不断产生新的考试内容以满足考试管理和安全要求的情况下,情况尤其如此。在本文中,我们描述了一种改进的尺度锚定方法来评估加拿大英语语言能力指数计划(CELPIP)测试和加拿大语言基准(CLB)之间的一致性,CLB是测试分数与能力框架相关联的。我们将讨论如何通过评估测试内容与性能标准之间的一致性,使用诸如CLB之类的熟练度框架来支持大规模标准化测试的内容验证。通过分享在高风险语言测试验证中与CLB合作的积极影响和挑战,我们希望有助于提高学者和从业者对这一国家语言框架的认识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigating the Alignment Between the CELPIP-General Reading Test and the Canadian Language Benchmarks: A Content Validation Study
Seeking evidence to support content validity is essential to test validation. This is especially the case in contexts where test scores are interpreted in relation to external proficiency standards and where new test content is constantly being produced to meet test administration and security demands. In this paper, we describe a modified scale- anchoring approach to assessing the alignment between the Canadian English Language Proficiency Index Program (CELPIP) test and the Canadian Language Benchmarks (CLB), the proficiency framework to which the test scores are linked. We discuss how proficiency frameworks such as the CLB can be used to support the content validation of large-scale standardized tests through an evaluation of the alignment between the test content and the performance standards. By sharing both the positive implications and challenges of working with the CLB in high-stakes language test validation, we hope to help raise the profile of this national language framework among scholars and practitioners.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics
Canadian Journal of Applied Linguistics LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
审稿时长
52 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信