线路起动永磁同步电动机动力学特性不同建模方法的比较

B. Wymeersch, F. De Belie, M. Ibrahim, C. Rasmussen, L. Vandevelde
{"title":"线路起动永磁同步电动机动力学特性不同建模方法的比较","authors":"B. Wymeersch, F. De Belie, M. Ibrahim, C. Rasmussen, L. Vandevelde","doi":"10.1109/IEECON.2018.8712266","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To reach energy efficiency goals the demand to high efficient motors, e.g. Permanent Magnet Motors, is increasing. It is hard to start permanent magnet synchronous motors direct on line. Including power electronics is expensive and power consuming. Therefore, a rotor cage offers a solution in systems without need of control. Although the problem of starting can be solved using the rotor cage, these machines still fail to synchronize in some situations. These failures can have a negative influence on the performance of the machine, due to heating. To investigate the performance of the motor in many situations, simulation techniques have to be used. The choice among these techniques depends on the requirements of the design. Three common techniques can be found: Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Magnetic Equivalent Circuits (MEC) and the 2-phase modelling in a rotor reference frame (dq). techniques. In this paper not only their benefits and drawbacks, but also their complementarity is discussed. The discussion is illustrated with case examples.","PeriodicalId":6628,"journal":{"name":"2018 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","volume":"40 1","pages":"1-4"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison Between Different Modelling Methods to Study the Dynamical Behaviour of Line Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors\",\"authors\":\"B. Wymeersch, F. De Belie, M. Ibrahim, C. Rasmussen, L. Vandevelde\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IEECON.2018.8712266\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To reach energy efficiency goals the demand to high efficient motors, e.g. Permanent Magnet Motors, is increasing. It is hard to start permanent magnet synchronous motors direct on line. Including power electronics is expensive and power consuming. Therefore, a rotor cage offers a solution in systems without need of control. Although the problem of starting can be solved using the rotor cage, these machines still fail to synchronize in some situations. These failures can have a negative influence on the performance of the machine, due to heating. To investigate the performance of the motor in many situations, simulation techniques have to be used. The choice among these techniques depends on the requirements of the design. Three common techniques can be found: Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Magnetic Equivalent Circuits (MEC) and the 2-phase modelling in a rotor reference frame (dq). techniques. In this paper not only their benefits and drawbacks, but also their complementarity is discussed. The discussion is illustrated with case examples.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6628,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"1-4\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-03-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEECON.2018.8712266\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 International Electrical Engineering Congress (iEECON)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IEECON.2018.8712266","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了达到能源效率的目标,对高效电机,如永磁电机的需求正在增加。永磁同步电动机在线直接起动困难。包括电力电子设备是昂贵和耗电的。因此,转子保持架为不需要控制的系统提供了解决方案。虽然使用转子保持架可以解决起动问题,但这些机器在某些情况下仍然无法同步。由于加热,这些故障会对机器的性能产生负面影响。为了研究电机在许多情况下的性能,必须使用仿真技术。这些技术的选择取决于设计的要求。三种常见的技术可以找到:有限元分析(FEA),磁等效电路(MEC)和转子参照系(dq)的两相建模。技术。本文不仅讨论了它们的优缺点,还讨论了它们的互补性。用实例说明了讨论的内容。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison Between Different Modelling Methods to Study the Dynamical Behaviour of Line Start Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motors
To reach energy efficiency goals the demand to high efficient motors, e.g. Permanent Magnet Motors, is increasing. It is hard to start permanent magnet synchronous motors direct on line. Including power electronics is expensive and power consuming. Therefore, a rotor cage offers a solution in systems without need of control. Although the problem of starting can be solved using the rotor cage, these machines still fail to synchronize in some situations. These failures can have a negative influence on the performance of the machine, due to heating. To investigate the performance of the motor in many situations, simulation techniques have to be used. The choice among these techniques depends on the requirements of the design. Three common techniques can be found: Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Magnetic Equivalent Circuits (MEC) and the 2-phase modelling in a rotor reference frame (dq). techniques. In this paper not only their benefits and drawbacks, but also their complementarity is discussed. The discussion is illustrated with case examples.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信