通过将课程学习成果与Bloom的分类法框架结合起来,改进项目管理课程

IF 1.5 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
E. Karanja, Laurell C. Malone
{"title":"通过将课程学习成果与Bloom的分类法框架结合起来,改进项目管理课程","authors":"E. Karanja, Laurell C. Malone","doi":"10.1108/jieb-05-2020-0038","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to investigate how to improve the project management (PM) curriculum by evaluating the nature and alignment of learning outcomes in the PM course syllabi with Bloom’s Taxonomy framework.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research methodology for this study is an integrative approach that uses document analysis and content analysis. The data set was selected based on a purposeful sampling method and came from PM course syllabi for classes that were taught during the 2016–2018 academic years.\n\n\nFindings\nResults revealed that most of the reviewed PM course syllabi contained learning outcomes although they were written and assessed at the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy and knowledge dimensions. The study calls for the academy and industry to partner in improving the PM curriculum to lower the PM talent deficit and increase project success rates.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThe absence of PM learning outcomes or the presence of poorly written PM learning outcomes in a course implies that the academy should provide professional development programs to help professors learn how to formulate and write specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely learning outcomes. The professors should also ensure that the learning outcomes use a type of cognitive taxonomy that is aligned with the appropriate assessments to measure, monitor and guarantee assurance of learning.\n\n\nPractical implications\nAcademy and industry partners can work collaboratively to provide students with opportunities that expose them to real-world experiential projects, internships and job opportunities while concurrently giving them hands-on practical applications of learned PM knowledge and skills. The society will be well served when the academy is able to produce well-qualified PM personnel capable of successfully carrying out PM activities and lowering the project’s failure rates.\n\n\nSocial implications\nThe society will be well served when the academy is able to produce well-qualified PM personnel capable of successfully carrying out PM activities and lowering the project’s failure rates.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study to specifically investigate the presence and nature of PM learning outcomes in course syllabi. By evaluating the alignment between PM learning outcomes and Bloom’s Taxonomy action verbs and cognitive processes, the study provides some exemplars of well-written and measurable learning outcomes that professors can use to inform their PM curriculum through course design or redesign.\n","PeriodicalId":43809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Education in Business","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Improving project management curriculum by aligning course learning outcomes with Bloom’s taxonomy framework\",\"authors\":\"E. Karanja, Laurell C. Malone\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/jieb-05-2020-0038\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThis study aims to investigate how to improve the project management (PM) curriculum by evaluating the nature and alignment of learning outcomes in the PM course syllabi with Bloom’s Taxonomy framework.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThe research methodology for this study is an integrative approach that uses document analysis and content analysis. The data set was selected based on a purposeful sampling method and came from PM course syllabi for classes that were taught during the 2016–2018 academic years.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nResults revealed that most of the reviewed PM course syllabi contained learning outcomes although they were written and assessed at the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy and knowledge dimensions. The study calls for the academy and industry to partner in improving the PM curriculum to lower the PM talent deficit and increase project success rates.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThe absence of PM learning outcomes or the presence of poorly written PM learning outcomes in a course implies that the academy should provide professional development programs to help professors learn how to formulate and write specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely learning outcomes. The professors should also ensure that the learning outcomes use a type of cognitive taxonomy that is aligned with the appropriate assessments to measure, monitor and guarantee assurance of learning.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nAcademy and industry partners can work collaboratively to provide students with opportunities that expose them to real-world experiential projects, internships and job opportunities while concurrently giving them hands-on practical applications of learned PM knowledge and skills. The society will be well served when the academy is able to produce well-qualified PM personnel capable of successfully carrying out PM activities and lowering the project’s failure rates.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nThe society will be well served when the academy is able to produce well-qualified PM personnel capable of successfully carrying out PM activities and lowering the project’s failure rates.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study to specifically investigate the presence and nature of PM learning outcomes in course syllabi. By evaluating the alignment between PM learning outcomes and Bloom’s Taxonomy action verbs and cognitive processes, the study provides some exemplars of well-written and measurable learning outcomes that professors can use to inform their PM curriculum through course design or redesign.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":43809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of International Education in Business\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of International Education in Business\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-05-2020-0038\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Education in Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jieb-05-2020-0038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨如何改进项目管理(PM)课程,通过评估项目管理课程教学大纲中的学习成果的性质和一致性与布鲁姆的分类框架。设计/方法/方法本研究的研究方法是采用文献分析和内容分析相结合的方法。数据集是基于有目的的抽样方法选择的,来自2016-2018学年PM课程的教学大纲。研究结果显示,大多数审查的PM课程大纲包含了学习成果,尽管它们是在布鲁姆分类法和知识维度的较低水平上编写和评估的。该研究呼吁学术界和工业界合作改善项目管理课程,以降低项目管理人才缺口,提高项目成功率。研究限制/启示项目管理学习成果的缺失或项目管理学习成果在课程中写得不好意味着学院应该提供专业发展计划,帮助教授学习如何制定和撰写具体的、可衡量的、可实现的、相关的和及时的学习成果。教授还应确保学习成果使用一种认知分类法,这种分类法与适当的评估相一致,以衡量、监控和保证学习的保证。实际意义学院和行业合作伙伴可以协同工作,为学生提供机会,让他们接触到现实世界的体验项目,实习和工作机会,同时给他们学到的PM知识和技能的实际应用。当学院能够培养出合格的项目管理人员,能够成功地开展项目管理活动并降低项目的失败率时,社会将得到很好的服务。社会意义当学院能够培养出合格的项目管理人员,能够成功地开展项目管理活动并降低项目的失败率时,社会将得到很好的服务。原创性/价值据研究人员所知,这是第一个专门调查项目管理学习成果在课程大纲中的存在和性质的研究。通过评估项目管理学习成果与布鲁姆分类法行为动词和认知过程之间的一致性,该研究提供了一些编写良好且可衡量的学习成果的范例,教授可以通过课程设计或重新设计来为他们的项目管理课程提供信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Improving project management curriculum by aligning course learning outcomes with Bloom’s taxonomy framework
Purpose This study aims to investigate how to improve the project management (PM) curriculum by evaluating the nature and alignment of learning outcomes in the PM course syllabi with Bloom’s Taxonomy framework. Design/methodology/approach The research methodology for this study is an integrative approach that uses document analysis and content analysis. The data set was selected based on a purposeful sampling method and came from PM course syllabi for classes that were taught during the 2016–2018 academic years. Findings Results revealed that most of the reviewed PM course syllabi contained learning outcomes although they were written and assessed at the lower levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy and knowledge dimensions. The study calls for the academy and industry to partner in improving the PM curriculum to lower the PM talent deficit and increase project success rates. Research limitations/implications The absence of PM learning outcomes or the presence of poorly written PM learning outcomes in a course implies that the academy should provide professional development programs to help professors learn how to formulate and write specific, measurable, achievable, relevant and timely learning outcomes. The professors should also ensure that the learning outcomes use a type of cognitive taxonomy that is aligned with the appropriate assessments to measure, monitor and guarantee assurance of learning. Practical implications Academy and industry partners can work collaboratively to provide students with opportunities that expose them to real-world experiential projects, internships and job opportunities while concurrently giving them hands-on practical applications of learned PM knowledge and skills. The society will be well served when the academy is able to produce well-qualified PM personnel capable of successfully carrying out PM activities and lowering the project’s failure rates. Social implications The society will be well served when the academy is able to produce well-qualified PM personnel capable of successfully carrying out PM activities and lowering the project’s failure rates. Originality/value To the researchers’ knowledge, this is the first study to specifically investigate the presence and nature of PM learning outcomes in course syllabi. By evaluating the alignment between PM learning outcomes and Bloom’s Taxonomy action verbs and cognitive processes, the study provides some exemplars of well-written and measurable learning outcomes that professors can use to inform their PM curriculum through course design or redesign.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of International Education in Business
Journal of International Education in Business EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
19
期刊介绍: The journal of International Education in Business (JIEB) is a peer reviewed journal concerned with theoretical and pedagogic aspects of international education in business schools and its flow-on implications for the workplace. The journal publishes papers that are concerned with: - international education, - cross- and inter-cultural aspects of internationalisation, - internationalisation of business schools, - business school teaching and learning, - academic and social engagement of students, - recruitment and marketing of business education in international contexts, - quality processes with respect to internationalisation, and - global organisations as stakeholders of internationalisation. Theoretical and empirical papers (qualitative and quantitative) as well as case analyses are invited. Papers that explore micro- and macro-perspectives in business and international education are also included.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信