Andre Gonçalves Prospero, Ana Carolina Ferreira, Diana Rodrigues Pina, Antonio Cesar Pernomian, Wander De Oliveira
{"title":"使用Exradin A12圆柱形室进行电子束参考剂量测定的不同方案分析","authors":"Andre Gonçalves Prospero, Ana Carolina Ferreira, Diana Rodrigues Pina, Antonio Cesar Pernomian, Wander De Oliveira","doi":"10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Technical Report Series 398 (TRS-398), Electron Dosimetry Working Party (EWDP), and Task Group 51 (TG 51) are the most important protocols for reference dosimetry. In the case of electron beam reference dosimetry, these protocols recommend using parallel-plate ionization chambers for beams with R50 values below specific thresholds. However, recent papers suggested using cylindrical chambers for reference dosimetry of all electron beam energies. Here we compared different protocols using a cylindrical chamber with the recommendations of using a parallel-plate chamber and the TRS-398 formalism for the dosimetry of several electron beam energies. We employed electron beams with nominal energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV of a Varian 2100C linear accelerator, an Exradin A12, and an Exradin P11 chamber for the analysis. The results showed differences below 3% when comparing the cylindrical chamber and alternative protocols with the parallel-plate chamber and the TRS-398 formalism for electron beams reference dosimetry. These results can bring confidence in using a cylindrical chamber for reference electron beam dosimetry, which can make the electron beam dosimetry procedure simpler and faster.","PeriodicalId":9203,"journal":{"name":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analysis of different protocols using an Exradin A12 cylindrical chamber for electron beam reference dosimetry\",\"authors\":\"Andre Gonçalves Prospero, Ana Carolina Ferreira, Diana Rodrigues Pina, Antonio Cesar Pernomian, Wander De Oliveira\",\"doi\":\"10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Technical Report Series 398 (TRS-398), Electron Dosimetry Working Party (EWDP), and Task Group 51 (TG 51) are the most important protocols for reference dosimetry. In the case of electron beam reference dosimetry, these protocols recommend using parallel-plate ionization chambers for beams with R50 values below specific thresholds. However, recent papers suggested using cylindrical chambers for reference dosimetry of all electron beam energies. Here we compared different protocols using a cylindrical chamber with the recommendations of using a parallel-plate chamber and the TRS-398 formalism for the dosimetry of several electron beam energies. We employed electron beams with nominal energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV of a Varian 2100C linear accelerator, an Exradin A12, and an Exradin P11 chamber for the analysis. The results showed differences below 3% when comparing the cylindrical chamber and alternative protocols with the parallel-plate chamber and the TRS-398 formalism for electron beams reference dosimetry. These results can bring confidence in using a cylindrical chamber for reference electron beam dosimetry, which can make the electron beam dosimetry procedure simpler and faster.\",\"PeriodicalId\":9203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Brazilian Journal of Radiation Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15392/2319-0612.2023.2232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Analysis of different protocols using an Exradin A12 cylindrical chamber for electron beam reference dosimetry
The Technical Report Series 398 (TRS-398), Electron Dosimetry Working Party (EWDP), and Task Group 51 (TG 51) are the most important protocols for reference dosimetry. In the case of electron beam reference dosimetry, these protocols recommend using parallel-plate ionization chambers for beams with R50 values below specific thresholds. However, recent papers suggested using cylindrical chambers for reference dosimetry of all electron beam energies. Here we compared different protocols using a cylindrical chamber with the recommendations of using a parallel-plate chamber and the TRS-398 formalism for the dosimetry of several electron beam energies. We employed electron beams with nominal energies of 4, 6, 9, 12, and 15 MeV of a Varian 2100C linear accelerator, an Exradin A12, and an Exradin P11 chamber for the analysis. The results showed differences below 3% when comparing the cylindrical chamber and alternative protocols with the parallel-plate chamber and the TRS-398 formalism for electron beams reference dosimetry. These results can bring confidence in using a cylindrical chamber for reference electron beam dosimetry, which can make the electron beam dosimetry procedure simpler and faster.