引起人类皮肤感染的细菌中抗生素耐药性的当前趋势;横断面研究

M. Khan
{"title":"引起人类皮肤感染的细菌中抗生素耐药性的当前趋势;横断面研究","authors":"M. Khan","doi":"10.15406/jdc.2021.05.00189","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: To determine the current status of skin infections causing bacteria and their pattern of resistance to widely used antibiotics among the physician referred patients in district Peshawar, Pakistan. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of 164 pus samples from diseased patients, referred by physicians was done for a period from February 2020 to January 2021 at Department of Microbiology, Complex medical laboratory and Research center, Peshawar, Pakistan. Results: The bacterial growth were obtained in 88 pus samples. Among these isolated bacterial species Escherichia coli was the most prevalent pathogen, present in (46%), Staphylococcus aureus (39%), Proteus species (11%), Klebseilla species (2%) and Pseudomonas aerugenosa (2%), respectively. Among the tested antibiotics resistance wise E.coli was highly resistance to Ampicillin (92.5%), S. Aureus to Levofloxacin (91.1%), Proteus spp .to Doxycycline (90%), Klebsiella spp. to Meropenem (100%), Amoxicillin (100%) and P. aeruginosato Aztreonam (100%), Doxycycline (100%), respectively.Sensitivity wise E.coli was highly sensitive to Amikacin (90%), S. aureus to Meropenem (91.1%) and Doxycycline (91.1%),Proteus spp. to Meropenem (100%), Klebsiella spp. to Ciprofloxacin (100%), Cefotaxime (100%), Aztreonam (100%) and Doxycycline (100%), P. aeruginosa to Amikacin (100%), Meropenem(100%), Ciprofloxacin (100%), Gentamicin (100%), Cefotaxime (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%), Ampicillin (100%) and Cefotaxime (100%), respectively. Conclusion: The most prevalent skin infections causing bacteria was E.coli, followed by S. aureus, Proteus spp., Klebseilla spp. and P. aerugenosa, respectively. The antibiogram provides adequate knowledge of effective therapeutic agents for the treatment strategies of skin infections.","PeriodicalId":23420,"journal":{"name":"Ukrainian Journal of Dermatology, Venerology, Cosmetology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Current trends of antibiotic resistance among human skin infections causing bacteria; a cross-sectional study\",\"authors\":\"M. Khan\",\"doi\":\"10.15406/jdc.2021.05.00189\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: To determine the current status of skin infections causing bacteria and their pattern of resistance to widely used antibiotics among the physician referred patients in district Peshawar, Pakistan. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of 164 pus samples from diseased patients, referred by physicians was done for a period from February 2020 to January 2021 at Department of Microbiology, Complex medical laboratory and Research center, Peshawar, Pakistan. Results: The bacterial growth were obtained in 88 pus samples. Among these isolated bacterial species Escherichia coli was the most prevalent pathogen, present in (46%), Staphylococcus aureus (39%), Proteus species (11%), Klebseilla species (2%) and Pseudomonas aerugenosa (2%), respectively. Among the tested antibiotics resistance wise E.coli was highly resistance to Ampicillin (92.5%), S. Aureus to Levofloxacin (91.1%), Proteus spp .to Doxycycline (90%), Klebsiella spp. to Meropenem (100%), Amoxicillin (100%) and P. aeruginosato Aztreonam (100%), Doxycycline (100%), respectively.Sensitivity wise E.coli was highly sensitive to Amikacin (90%), S. aureus to Meropenem (91.1%) and Doxycycline (91.1%),Proteus spp. to Meropenem (100%), Klebsiella spp. to Ciprofloxacin (100%), Cefotaxime (100%), Aztreonam (100%) and Doxycycline (100%), P. aeruginosa to Amikacin (100%), Meropenem(100%), Ciprofloxacin (100%), Gentamicin (100%), Cefotaxime (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%), Ampicillin (100%) and Cefotaxime (100%), respectively. Conclusion: The most prevalent skin infections causing bacteria was E.coli, followed by S. aureus, Proteus spp., Klebseilla spp. and P. aerugenosa, respectively. The antibiogram provides adequate knowledge of effective therapeutic agents for the treatment strategies of skin infections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23420,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ukrainian Journal of Dermatology, Venerology, Cosmetology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ukrainian Journal of Dermatology, Venerology, Cosmetology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15406/jdc.2021.05.00189\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ukrainian Journal of Dermatology, Venerology, Cosmetology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15406/jdc.2021.05.00189","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

目的:了解巴基斯坦白沙瓦地区医师转诊患者皮肤感染病原菌现状及其对常用抗生素的耐药模式。材料和方法:在2020年2月至2021年1月期间,在巴基斯坦白沙瓦复杂医学实验室和研究中心微生物学系对医生转诊的164例患病患者的脓样本进行了横断面研究。结果:88份脓液标本均有细菌生长。在这些分离的细菌种类中,大肠杆菌是最常见的病原体,分别存在于金黄色葡萄球菌(39%)、变形杆菌(11%)、克雷伯菌(2%)和绿脓杆菌(2%)中。其中,大肠杆菌对氨苄西林(92.5%)、金黄色葡萄球菌对左氧氟沙星(91.1%)、变形杆菌对强力西环素(90%)、克雷伯菌对美罗培南(100%)、阿莫西林(100%)和铜绿假单胞菌对氨曲南(100%)、强力西环素(100%)的耐药程度最高。敏感性方面大肠杆菌对阿米卡星(90%)高度敏感,金黄色葡萄球菌对美罗培南(91.1%)和多西环素(91.1%)高度敏感,变形杆菌对美罗培南(100%)高度敏感,克雷伯菌对环丙沙星(100%)、头孢噻肟(100%)、氨曲南(100%)和多西环素(100%)高度敏感,铜绿假单胞菌对阿米卡星(100%)、美罗培南(100%)、环丙沙星(100%)、庆大霉素(100%)、头孢噻肟(100%)、头孢曲松(100%)、氨苄西林(100%)和头孢噻肟(100%)高度敏感。结论:引起皮肤感染的细菌以大肠杆菌最多,其次为金黄色葡萄球菌、变形杆菌、克雷伯菌和铜绿假单胞菌。抗生素谱为皮肤感染的治疗策略提供了有效治疗药物的充分知识。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Current trends of antibiotic resistance among human skin infections causing bacteria; a cross-sectional study
Objectives: To determine the current status of skin infections causing bacteria and their pattern of resistance to widely used antibiotics among the physician referred patients in district Peshawar, Pakistan. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study of 164 pus samples from diseased patients, referred by physicians was done for a period from February 2020 to January 2021 at Department of Microbiology, Complex medical laboratory and Research center, Peshawar, Pakistan. Results: The bacterial growth were obtained in 88 pus samples. Among these isolated bacterial species Escherichia coli was the most prevalent pathogen, present in (46%), Staphylococcus aureus (39%), Proteus species (11%), Klebseilla species (2%) and Pseudomonas aerugenosa (2%), respectively. Among the tested antibiotics resistance wise E.coli was highly resistance to Ampicillin (92.5%), S. Aureus to Levofloxacin (91.1%), Proteus spp .to Doxycycline (90%), Klebsiella spp. to Meropenem (100%), Amoxicillin (100%) and P. aeruginosato Aztreonam (100%), Doxycycline (100%), respectively.Sensitivity wise E.coli was highly sensitive to Amikacin (90%), S. aureus to Meropenem (91.1%) and Doxycycline (91.1%),Proteus spp. to Meropenem (100%), Klebsiella spp. to Ciprofloxacin (100%), Cefotaxime (100%), Aztreonam (100%) and Doxycycline (100%), P. aeruginosa to Amikacin (100%), Meropenem(100%), Ciprofloxacin (100%), Gentamicin (100%), Cefotaxime (100%), Ceftriaxone (100%), Ampicillin (100%) and Cefotaxime (100%), respectively. Conclusion: The most prevalent skin infections causing bacteria was E.coli, followed by S. aureus, Proteus spp., Klebseilla spp. and P. aerugenosa, respectively. The antibiogram provides adequate knowledge of effective therapeutic agents for the treatment strategies of skin infections.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信