响应面法对304不锈钢焊接接头抗拉强度的研究与预测

Hussain Zuhailawati, Muhammad Afiq Jamaluddin, Anasyida Abu Seman, Suhaina Ismail
{"title":"响应面法对304不锈钢焊接接头抗拉强度的研究与预测","authors":"Hussain Zuhailawati,&nbsp;Muhammad Afiq Jamaluddin,&nbsp;Anasyida Abu Seman,&nbsp;Suhaina Ismail","doi":"10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.096","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study deals with an investigation of welding behaviour of 304 stainless steel sheet metal in term of joint strength and microstructure. Composition analysis of the stainless steel plate and ER308 filler rod was performed using X-ray fluorescence and SEM-EDX. Tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding was done on SS 304 2B plate with thick-ness of 1.2<!--> <!-->mm in Coraza Systems Malaysia Sdn. Bhd using a KADEYOU machine. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to develop mathematical relation-ships between the welding process parameters (i.e, welding current, filler size and flow rate of the shielding gas) and the output variable of the weld joint (ultimate tensile strength) to determine the welding input parameters that led to the desired weld quality. Comparison between measured and calculated results was in good agreement indicating that the developed models can predict the responses adequately within the limits of welding pa-rameters being used. High welding current (50A) cause microstructure become finer and increase in tensile strength while low current (30A) caused root of the metal plate not weld completely which weakened the joint (724.84<!--> <!-->MPa and 718.33<!--> <!-->MPa, correspond-ingly). The smallest filler (1.6<!--> <!-->mm) was good for tensile strength (745.96 MPA) com-pared to the largest filler (2.4<!--> <!-->mm and 720.90<!--> <!-->MPa strength) because high heat energy used to melt the large filler also overheated the metal base that cause crack formation. High flow rate (14 cfh) caused tensile strength to drop (738.49<!--> <!-->MPa) due to the turbu-lence in the molten metal compared to the lowest flow rate (10 cfh and tensile 756.75<!--> <!-->MPa strength).</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20431,"journal":{"name":"Procedia Chemistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.096","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Welding Investigation and Prediction of Tensile Strength of 304 Stainless Steel Sheet Metal Joint by Response Surface Methodology\",\"authors\":\"Hussain Zuhailawati,&nbsp;Muhammad Afiq Jamaluddin,&nbsp;Anasyida Abu Seman,&nbsp;Suhaina Ismail\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.096\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>This study deals with an investigation of welding behaviour of 304 stainless steel sheet metal in term of joint strength and microstructure. Composition analysis of the stainless steel plate and ER308 filler rod was performed using X-ray fluorescence and SEM-EDX. Tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding was done on SS 304 2B plate with thick-ness of 1.2<!--> <!-->mm in Coraza Systems Malaysia Sdn. Bhd using a KADEYOU machine. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to develop mathematical relation-ships between the welding process parameters (i.e, welding current, filler size and flow rate of the shielding gas) and the output variable of the weld joint (ultimate tensile strength) to determine the welding input parameters that led to the desired weld quality. Comparison between measured and calculated results was in good agreement indicating that the developed models can predict the responses adequately within the limits of welding pa-rameters being used. High welding current (50A) cause microstructure become finer and increase in tensile strength while low current (30A) caused root of the metal plate not weld completely which weakened the joint (724.84<!--> <!-->MPa and 718.33<!--> <!-->MPa, correspond-ingly). The smallest filler (1.6<!--> <!-->mm) was good for tensile strength (745.96 MPA) com-pared to the largest filler (2.4<!--> <!-->mm and 720.90<!--> <!-->MPa strength) because high heat energy used to melt the large filler also overheated the metal base that cause crack formation. High flow rate (14 cfh) caused tensile strength to drop (738.49<!--> <!-->MPa) due to the turbu-lence in the molten metal compared to the lowest flow rate (10 cfh and tensile 756.75<!--> <!-->MPa strength).</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Procedia Chemistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.proche.2016.03.096\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Procedia Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187661961600142X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Procedia Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S187661961600142X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

本文从接头强度和显微组织两个方面研究了304不锈钢薄板的焊接性能。采用x射线荧光和SEM-EDX对不锈钢板和ER308填料棒进行成分分析。在Coraza Systems Malaysia Sdn公司对厚度为1.2 mm的SS 304 2B板进行钨惰性气体(TIG)焊接。使用KADEYOU机器。采用响应面法(RSM)建立焊接工艺参数(焊接电流、填充剂尺寸和保护气体流量)与焊缝输出变量(极限抗拉强度)之间的数学关系,从而确定获得理想焊接质量的焊接输入参数。实测结果与计算结果的比较表明,所建立的模型能够在所使用的焊接参数范围内充分预测焊接响应。大焊接电流(50A)使组织细化,抗拉强度提高,而小电流(30A)使金属板根部未完全焊接,削弱了接头(分别为724.84 MPa和718.33 MPa)。与最大的填料(2.4 mm, 720.90 MPA)相比,最小的填料(1.6 mm)具有较好的抗拉强度(745.96 MPA),因为用于熔化大填料的高热能也使金属基体过热,导致裂纹形成。与最低流量(10 cfh,拉伸强度756.75 MPa)相比,高流量(14 cfh)导致金属液中的湍流导致拉伸强度下降(738.49 MPa)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Welding Investigation and Prediction of Tensile Strength of 304 Stainless Steel Sheet Metal Joint by Response Surface Methodology

This study deals with an investigation of welding behaviour of 304 stainless steel sheet metal in term of joint strength and microstructure. Composition analysis of the stainless steel plate and ER308 filler rod was performed using X-ray fluorescence and SEM-EDX. Tungsten inert gas (TIG) welding was done on SS 304 2B plate with thick-ness of 1.2 mm in Coraza Systems Malaysia Sdn. Bhd using a KADEYOU machine. Response surface methodology (RSM) was employed to develop mathematical relation-ships between the welding process parameters (i.e, welding current, filler size and flow rate of the shielding gas) and the output variable of the weld joint (ultimate tensile strength) to determine the welding input parameters that led to the desired weld quality. Comparison between measured and calculated results was in good agreement indicating that the developed models can predict the responses adequately within the limits of welding pa-rameters being used. High welding current (50A) cause microstructure become finer and increase in tensile strength while low current (30A) caused root of the metal plate not weld completely which weakened the joint (724.84 MPa and 718.33 MPa, correspond-ingly). The smallest filler (1.6 mm) was good for tensile strength (745.96 MPA) com-pared to the largest filler (2.4 mm and 720.90 MPa strength) because high heat energy used to melt the large filler also overheated the metal base that cause crack formation. High flow rate (14 cfh) caused tensile strength to drop (738.49 MPa) due to the turbu-lence in the molten metal compared to the lowest flow rate (10 cfh and tensile 756.75 MPa strength).

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信