乔哈特地区不同土地利用方式下土壤有机碳组分

Ravindra Kumar Rekwar
{"title":"乔哈特地区不同土地利用方式下土壤有机碳组分","authors":"Ravindra Kumar Rekwar","doi":"10.47815/apsr.2022.10151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The present study was conducted using soil profiles of Jorhat district under different land use systems (LUS) i.e. Bamboo field, tea plantation and rainfed rice. The total soil organic carbon content at 0-15 cm depth varied from 7.86 to 8.43 g kg-1, wherein rainfed rice land use system recorded significantly higher total organic carbon (TOC) than tea plantation but at par with that of bamboo field. However, at 15-30, 30-60 and 60-100 cm soil depths bamboo field recorded significantly higher over other land use systems. Among these LUS, rainfed rice showed significantly higher very labile carbon (CVL) in soil than tea plantation and bamboo field at 0-15 cm depth whereas in 15-30 cm depth CVL in tea plantation was found to be significantly higher than bamboo field and rainfed rice. However, Bamboo field and tea plantation had CVL significantly higher than rainfed rice under 30-60 and 60-100 cm depths, respectively. In all the depths, labile carbon pool (CL) was significantly higher in bamboo field ranging from 1.01 to 1.67 g kg-1 whereas under bamboo field, less labile carbon (CLL) pool 0-15, 15-30 and 30-60 cm depths was significantly higher than tea plantation and rainfed rice soils. However, the recalcitrant carbon (CR) pool did not vary significantly among different LUS. Soil organic carbon stock in soil at 0-15 cm depth was found to be significantly higher in rainfed rice soil than tea plantation and bamboo field whereas in the remaining depths the SOC stock was significantly higher under bamboo field. Moreover, the interaction between LUS and depths varied significantly. Among different fractions (CL, CLL, CVL and CR fractions), CR fraction had the smallest variation among land uses, which indicate that the non-labile fraction was less sensitive to land use systems.","PeriodicalId":8031,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Plant and Soil Research","volume":"33 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Soil organic carbon fractions under different land use systems of Jorhat district\",\"authors\":\"Ravindra Kumar Rekwar\",\"doi\":\"10.47815/apsr.2022.10151\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The present study was conducted using soil profiles of Jorhat district under different land use systems (LUS) i.e. Bamboo field, tea plantation and rainfed rice. The total soil organic carbon content at 0-15 cm depth varied from 7.86 to 8.43 g kg-1, wherein rainfed rice land use system recorded significantly higher total organic carbon (TOC) than tea plantation but at par with that of bamboo field. However, at 15-30, 30-60 and 60-100 cm soil depths bamboo field recorded significantly higher over other land use systems. Among these LUS, rainfed rice showed significantly higher very labile carbon (CVL) in soil than tea plantation and bamboo field at 0-15 cm depth whereas in 15-30 cm depth CVL in tea plantation was found to be significantly higher than bamboo field and rainfed rice. However, Bamboo field and tea plantation had CVL significantly higher than rainfed rice under 30-60 and 60-100 cm depths, respectively. In all the depths, labile carbon pool (CL) was significantly higher in bamboo field ranging from 1.01 to 1.67 g kg-1 whereas under bamboo field, less labile carbon (CLL) pool 0-15, 15-30 and 30-60 cm depths was significantly higher than tea plantation and rainfed rice soils. However, the recalcitrant carbon (CR) pool did not vary significantly among different LUS. Soil organic carbon stock in soil at 0-15 cm depth was found to be significantly higher in rainfed rice soil than tea plantation and bamboo field whereas in the remaining depths the SOC stock was significantly higher under bamboo field. Moreover, the interaction between LUS and depths varied significantly. Among different fractions (CL, CLL, CVL and CR fractions), CR fraction had the smallest variation among land uses, which indicate that the non-labile fraction was less sensitive to land use systems.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8031,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Plant and Soil Research\",\"volume\":\"33 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Plant and Soil Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2022.10151\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Plant and Soil Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47815/apsr.2022.10151","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究以Jorhat地区不同土地利用系统(竹林、茶园和旱作水稻)下的土壤剖面为研究对象。0 ~ 15 cm深度土壤总有机碳含量在7.86 ~ 8.43 g kg-1之间变化,其中旱作水稻土地利用系统的总有机碳(TOC)显著高于茶园,但与竹林相当。在15- 30cm、30- 60cm和60- 100cm土壤深度,竹田的土壤深度显著高于其他土地利用系统。其中,在0 ~ 15 cm深度,旱作水稻土壤中极挥发性碳(CVL)显著高于茶园和竹园,而在15 ~ 30 cm深度,茶园土壤中极挥发性碳(CVL)显著高于竹园和旱作水稻。竹林和茶园在30 ~ 60 cm和60 ~ 100 cm深度下的CVL均显著高于旱作水稻。在所有深度,竹林土壤的不稳定碳库(CLL)在1.01 ~ 1.67 g kg-1范围内显著高于茶园土壤,而竹林土壤0 ~ 15、15 ~ 30和30 ~ 60 cm深度的不稳定碳库(CLL)显著高于茶园土壤和雨养水稻土壤。然而,在不同的LUS中,顽固性碳(CR)库差异不显著。旱作水稻土壤0 ~ 15 cm深度土壤有机碳储量显著高于茶园和竹园,其余深度土壤有机碳储量显著高于竹园。此外,LUS与深度之间的相互作用存在显著差异。在不同组分(CL、CLL、CVL和CR)中,CR组分在不同土地利用方式之间的变化最小,说明非不稳定组分对土地利用系统的敏感性较低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Soil organic carbon fractions under different land use systems of Jorhat district
The present study was conducted using soil profiles of Jorhat district under different land use systems (LUS) i.e. Bamboo field, tea plantation and rainfed rice. The total soil organic carbon content at 0-15 cm depth varied from 7.86 to 8.43 g kg-1, wherein rainfed rice land use system recorded significantly higher total organic carbon (TOC) than tea plantation but at par with that of bamboo field. However, at 15-30, 30-60 and 60-100 cm soil depths bamboo field recorded significantly higher over other land use systems. Among these LUS, rainfed rice showed significantly higher very labile carbon (CVL) in soil than tea plantation and bamboo field at 0-15 cm depth whereas in 15-30 cm depth CVL in tea plantation was found to be significantly higher than bamboo field and rainfed rice. However, Bamboo field and tea plantation had CVL significantly higher than rainfed rice under 30-60 and 60-100 cm depths, respectively. In all the depths, labile carbon pool (CL) was significantly higher in bamboo field ranging from 1.01 to 1.67 g kg-1 whereas under bamboo field, less labile carbon (CLL) pool 0-15, 15-30 and 30-60 cm depths was significantly higher than tea plantation and rainfed rice soils. However, the recalcitrant carbon (CR) pool did not vary significantly among different LUS. Soil organic carbon stock in soil at 0-15 cm depth was found to be significantly higher in rainfed rice soil than tea plantation and bamboo field whereas in the remaining depths the SOC stock was significantly higher under bamboo field. Moreover, the interaction between LUS and depths varied significantly. Among different fractions (CL, CLL, CVL and CR fractions), CR fraction had the smallest variation among land uses, which indicate that the non-labile fraction was less sensitive to land use systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信