高等教育可持续教与学过程中教育学指标评价工具的设计与验证

S. Darabi, N. Azizi, J. Salimi, N. Shirbegi
{"title":"高等教育可持续教与学过程中教育学指标评价工具的设计与验证","authors":"S. Darabi, N. Azizi, J. Salimi, N. Shirbegi","doi":"10.52547/rme.13.4.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: In recent years, higher education has faced three major paradigm shifts: \"Development of lifelong learning\", \"Democratization of knowledge\" and \"Development of the global knowledge community\". This study aims to design and validate a evaluating mechanism for the pedagogical elements and dimensions in sustainable teaching-learning processes in both public and private academic institutions. Methods : This is an explanatory mixed method research design that has been done sequentially in two parts, qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative section, data was collected via semi-structured interviews. Participants including 17 experts and higher education specialists who were selected by purposive sampling method. In this section, inductive content analysis method was applied for data analysis and findings was validated by participants and colleagues. The model of the quantitative section was descriptive-survey. For this 322 faculty members in public and private universities were selected based on the Cochran's estimation for formulating sample size. A researcher- made questionnaire including 3 subscales was used for data collection respectively. Data was analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. Result: The results of data analysis in the coding process led","PeriodicalId":75518,"journal":{"name":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","volume":"133 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Design and Validation of Instrument for Evaluating Indicators of Pedagogy in Sustainable Teaching- Learning Process in Higher Education\",\"authors\":\"S. Darabi, N. Azizi, J. Salimi, N. Shirbegi\",\"doi\":\"10.52547/rme.13.4.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: In recent years, higher education has faced three major paradigm shifts: \\\"Development of lifelong learning\\\", \\\"Democratization of knowledge\\\" and \\\"Development of the global knowledge community\\\". This study aims to design and validate a evaluating mechanism for the pedagogical elements and dimensions in sustainable teaching-learning processes in both public and private academic institutions. Methods : This is an explanatory mixed method research design that has been done sequentially in two parts, qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative section, data was collected via semi-structured interviews. Participants including 17 experts and higher education specialists who were selected by purposive sampling method. In this section, inductive content analysis method was applied for data analysis and findings was validated by participants and colleagues. The model of the quantitative section was descriptive-survey. For this 322 faculty members in public and private universities were selected based on the Cochran's estimation for formulating sample size. A researcher- made questionnaire including 3 subscales was used for data collection respectively. Data was analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. Result: The results of data analysis in the coding process led\",\"PeriodicalId\":75518,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education\",\"volume\":\"133 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.4.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Conference on Research in Medical Education. Conference on Research in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52547/rme.13.4.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,高等教育面临着“发展终身学习”、“知识民主化”和“发展全球知识共同体”三大范式转变。本研究旨在设计并验证公立和私立学术机构可持续教与学过程中教学要素和维度的评估机制。方法:采用解释性混合法研究设计,分定性和定量两部分依次进行。在定性部分,通过半结构化访谈收集数据。研究对象包括17名专家和高等教育专家,采用有目的抽样方法。在本节中,采用归纳内容分析法进行数据分析,并通过参与者和同事对研究结果进行验证。定量断面采用描述性调查模型。为此,根据Cochran估计制定样本量,选择了公立和私立大学的322名教师。采用研究者自行设计的问卷进行数据收集,问卷包含3个分量表。采用SPSS和AMOS软件对数据进行分析。结果:数据分析结果在编码过程中导致
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Design and Validation of Instrument for Evaluating Indicators of Pedagogy in Sustainable Teaching- Learning Process in Higher Education
Introduction: In recent years, higher education has faced three major paradigm shifts: "Development of lifelong learning", "Democratization of knowledge" and "Development of the global knowledge community". This study aims to design and validate a evaluating mechanism for the pedagogical elements and dimensions in sustainable teaching-learning processes in both public and private academic institutions. Methods : This is an explanatory mixed method research design that has been done sequentially in two parts, qualitative and quantitative. In the qualitative section, data was collected via semi-structured interviews. Participants including 17 experts and higher education specialists who were selected by purposive sampling method. In this section, inductive content analysis method was applied for data analysis and findings was validated by participants and colleagues. The model of the quantitative section was descriptive-survey. For this 322 faculty members in public and private universities were selected based on the Cochran's estimation for formulating sample size. A researcher- made questionnaire including 3 subscales was used for data collection respectively. Data was analyzed using SPSS and AMOS software. Result: The results of data analysis in the coding process led
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信