烟草税:公共卫生的重要工具

J. Branston
{"title":"烟草税:公共卫生的重要工具","authors":"J. Branston","doi":"10.5114/JHI.2019.87821","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Tobacco taxes are widely regarded as one of the most effective tobacco control policies for improving the public health, which is why they are a key part of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC). Such taxes increase the cost of selling tobacco products, and the resulting higher retail prices provide a strong encouragement for smokers to quit their deadly habit. Tobacco taxes also provide a source of significant tax revenue, which can be used to fund other public health measures, amongst other things, and such revenues generally increase when tax rates are increased. However, recent studies have shown that the tobacco industry has adopted a range of strategies to minimise the impact of such taxes, but also that the nature of the tobacco taxes applied can help combat such actions. Tobacco taxes are most effective when they take the form of a lump sum paid per tobacco stick, rather than when they are taxed in proportion to the sales price, and the downside of proportion taxes can be partially offset by the use of appropriate Minimum Excise Taxes. Such an approach to taxation not only reduces the pricing spread of tobacco products in the market place but also the tax in relation to the harm caused. This is important as smokers need a strong signal to quit their deadly habit, or at least to switch to less risky products if they are unwilling or unable. Tobacco taxes also need to be regularly updated in order to address the problem that tobacco products become more affordable over time as consumer incomes increase. An announced government policy commitment to regular above-inflation increases in tobacco duty is therefore helpful, although tax changes are most effective when unexpected and relatively large. If taxes are not regularly increased, research shows that the industry cleverly adjusts its prices in order to both maintain tobacco use and also increase their profits. This effectively means that the industry is increasing their profits when this money could have gone to the government in the form of higher tax revenues. The tobacco industry often argues that tax increases will lead to large increases in illicit tobacco products that bypass tobacco taxation, but their own actions show that they do not believe this line. Recent experience in the UK also shows that tobacco taxes can be consistently increased significantly, whilst simultaneously driving down the rate of illicit tobacco use. The key is a comprehensive package of enforcement measures. The Polish government is strongly encourage to increase taxes from their relatively low level compared to leading tobacco control countries such as the UK, Ireland, and Australia. For example, according to the European Commission as of 1st March 2019, the taxation due on 1,000 cigarettes was only €99.45 in Poland, but €329.99 in the UK and €378.49 in Ireland. With so low levels of taxation Poland has some of the cheapest tobacco in Europe, with the Weighted Average Price of 1,000 cigarettes being just €162.80 compared to €438.38 in the UK and €568.50 in Ireland. Addressing such low levels of taxation and hence retail prices, will not only enhance the public health but will likely lead to significant increases in government tax revenue so long as there is a comprehensive enforcement strategy to combat the risk of illicit. Taxes should not only be increased significantly once but updated on a yearly basis, and also be changed to use specific taxation to the maximum extent allowed by EU tobacco rules.","PeriodicalId":93580,"journal":{"name":"Journal of health inequalities","volume":"10 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tobacco taxation: A key tool for public health\",\"authors\":\"J. Branston\",\"doi\":\"10.5114/JHI.2019.87821\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Tobacco taxes are widely regarded as one of the most effective tobacco control policies for improving the public health, which is why they are a key part of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC). Such taxes increase the cost of selling tobacco products, and the resulting higher retail prices provide a strong encouragement for smokers to quit their deadly habit. Tobacco taxes also provide a source of significant tax revenue, which can be used to fund other public health measures, amongst other things, and such revenues generally increase when tax rates are increased. However, recent studies have shown that the tobacco industry has adopted a range of strategies to minimise the impact of such taxes, but also that the nature of the tobacco taxes applied can help combat such actions. Tobacco taxes are most effective when they take the form of a lump sum paid per tobacco stick, rather than when they are taxed in proportion to the sales price, and the downside of proportion taxes can be partially offset by the use of appropriate Minimum Excise Taxes. Such an approach to taxation not only reduces the pricing spread of tobacco products in the market place but also the tax in relation to the harm caused. This is important as smokers need a strong signal to quit their deadly habit, or at least to switch to less risky products if they are unwilling or unable. Tobacco taxes also need to be regularly updated in order to address the problem that tobacco products become more affordable over time as consumer incomes increase. An announced government policy commitment to regular above-inflation increases in tobacco duty is therefore helpful, although tax changes are most effective when unexpected and relatively large. If taxes are not regularly increased, research shows that the industry cleverly adjusts its prices in order to both maintain tobacco use and also increase their profits. This effectively means that the industry is increasing their profits when this money could have gone to the government in the form of higher tax revenues. The tobacco industry often argues that tax increases will lead to large increases in illicit tobacco products that bypass tobacco taxation, but their own actions show that they do not believe this line. Recent experience in the UK also shows that tobacco taxes can be consistently increased significantly, whilst simultaneously driving down the rate of illicit tobacco use. The key is a comprehensive package of enforcement measures. The Polish government is strongly encourage to increase taxes from their relatively low level compared to leading tobacco control countries such as the UK, Ireland, and Australia. For example, according to the European Commission as of 1st March 2019, the taxation due on 1,000 cigarettes was only €99.45 in Poland, but €329.99 in the UK and €378.49 in Ireland. With so low levels of taxation Poland has some of the cheapest tobacco in Europe, with the Weighted Average Price of 1,000 cigarettes being just €162.80 compared to €438.38 in the UK and €568.50 in Ireland. Addressing such low levels of taxation and hence retail prices, will not only enhance the public health but will likely lead to significant increases in government tax revenue so long as there is a comprehensive enforcement strategy to combat the risk of illicit. Taxes should not only be increased significantly once but updated on a yearly basis, and also be changed to use specific taxation to the maximum extent allowed by EU tobacco rules.\",\"PeriodicalId\":93580,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of health inequalities\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of health inequalities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5114/JHI.2019.87821\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of health inequalities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5114/JHI.2019.87821","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

烟草税被广泛认为是改善公众健康的最有效的烟草控制政策之一,这就是为什么它们是世界卫生组织(WHO)烟草控制框架公约(FCTC)的关键部分。这样的税收增加了销售烟草产品的成本,由此导致的更高的零售价格为吸烟者戒烟提供了强有力的鼓励。烟草税还提供了一个可观的税收来源,可用于资助其他公共卫生措施,除其他外,这种收入通常会随着税率的提高而增加。然而,最近的研究表明,烟草业采取了一系列策略来尽量减少此类税收的影响,而且所征收烟草税的性质也有助于打击此类行为。烟草税最有效的形式是采取每根烟草一次性支付的形式,而不是按销售价格按比例征税,比例税的缺点可以通过适当的最低消费税部分抵消。这种征税方法不仅减少了烟草制品在市场上的价差,而且减少了与所造成的危害有关的税收。这一点很重要,因为吸烟者需要一个强烈的信号来戒掉他们的致命习惯,或者至少在他们不愿意或不能戒掉的情况下转向风险较小的产品。烟草税也需要定期更新,以解决随着消费者收入的增加,烟草制品随着时间的推移变得更加负担得起的问题。因此,政府宣布的定期提高烟草税的政策承诺是有益的,尽管税收变化在意外和相对较大的情况下最有效。研究表明,如果不定期增加税收,烟草业就会巧妙地调整价格,以便既保持烟草的使用,又增加利润。这实际上意味着该行业正在增加利润,而这些钱本可以以更高的税收形式进入政府。烟草业经常辩称,增加税收将导致绕过烟草税的非法烟草制品大幅增加,但他们自己的行动表明,他们不相信这一说法。英国最近的经验也表明,烟草税可以持续大幅增加,同时降低非法烟草使用率。关键是一整套全面的执法措施。与英国、爱尔兰和澳大利亚等主要烟草控制国家相比,波兰政府的税收水平相对较低,因此强烈鼓励波兰政府提高税收。例如,根据欧盟委员会的数据,截至2019年3月1日,1000支香烟在波兰的应税金额仅为99.45欧元,但在英国为329.99欧元,在爱尔兰为378.49欧元。由于税收水平如此之低,波兰是欧洲最便宜的烟草国家之一,1000支香烟的加权平均价格仅为162.80欧元,而英国为438.38欧元,爱尔兰为568.50欧元。解决如此低的税收水平和零售价格问题,不仅可以改善公众健康,而且只要有一项全面的执法战略来打击非法毒品的风险,就可能导致政府税收的大幅增加。税收不仅应该大幅增加一次,而且应该每年更新一次,并且应该在欧盟烟草规则允许的最大范围内改变为使用特定税收。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tobacco taxation: A key tool for public health
Tobacco taxes are widely regarded as one of the most effective tobacco control policies for improving the public health, which is why they are a key part of the World Health Organisation (WHO) Framework Convention for Tobacco Control (FCTC). Such taxes increase the cost of selling tobacco products, and the resulting higher retail prices provide a strong encouragement for smokers to quit their deadly habit. Tobacco taxes also provide a source of significant tax revenue, which can be used to fund other public health measures, amongst other things, and such revenues generally increase when tax rates are increased. However, recent studies have shown that the tobacco industry has adopted a range of strategies to minimise the impact of such taxes, but also that the nature of the tobacco taxes applied can help combat such actions. Tobacco taxes are most effective when they take the form of a lump sum paid per tobacco stick, rather than when they are taxed in proportion to the sales price, and the downside of proportion taxes can be partially offset by the use of appropriate Minimum Excise Taxes. Such an approach to taxation not only reduces the pricing spread of tobacco products in the market place but also the tax in relation to the harm caused. This is important as smokers need a strong signal to quit their deadly habit, or at least to switch to less risky products if they are unwilling or unable. Tobacco taxes also need to be regularly updated in order to address the problem that tobacco products become more affordable over time as consumer incomes increase. An announced government policy commitment to regular above-inflation increases in tobacco duty is therefore helpful, although tax changes are most effective when unexpected and relatively large. If taxes are not regularly increased, research shows that the industry cleverly adjusts its prices in order to both maintain tobacco use and also increase their profits. This effectively means that the industry is increasing their profits when this money could have gone to the government in the form of higher tax revenues. The tobacco industry often argues that tax increases will lead to large increases in illicit tobacco products that bypass tobacco taxation, but their own actions show that they do not believe this line. Recent experience in the UK also shows that tobacco taxes can be consistently increased significantly, whilst simultaneously driving down the rate of illicit tobacco use. The key is a comprehensive package of enforcement measures. The Polish government is strongly encourage to increase taxes from their relatively low level compared to leading tobacco control countries such as the UK, Ireland, and Australia. For example, according to the European Commission as of 1st March 2019, the taxation due on 1,000 cigarettes was only €99.45 in Poland, but €329.99 in the UK and €378.49 in Ireland. With so low levels of taxation Poland has some of the cheapest tobacco in Europe, with the Weighted Average Price of 1,000 cigarettes being just €162.80 compared to €438.38 in the UK and €568.50 in Ireland. Addressing such low levels of taxation and hence retail prices, will not only enhance the public health but will likely lead to significant increases in government tax revenue so long as there is a comprehensive enforcement strategy to combat the risk of illicit. Taxes should not only be increased significantly once but updated on a yearly basis, and also be changed to use specific taxation to the maximum extent allowed by EU tobacco rules.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信