{"title":"长期护理机构的患者安全与COVID-19大流行","authors":"A. Wu, J. McIntyre","doi":"10.1177/25160435211059871","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Significant parts of the world are growing old. During this century, several regions will experience a marked increase in the proportion of adults over 65 years old. This transition is well underway in the United States as the so-called baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, began turning 65 in 2011. It is projected that the US population aged 65 and over will reach 83.7 million by 2050, equivalent to more than 20% of the entire population. The US is not unique in this. By 2040, the median age in Japan will be 70, and it is anticipated that Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean will join Europe and North America as having more people older than 60 than children under age 15. The need for long-term care is growing alongside the rapidly aging population. In 2018, over 14 million Americans needed long-term care services. By 2025, it is projected that 1 out of every 5 Americans will be retirement age, and just over half of those individuals will require long-term care. Despite unprecedented growth in the long-term care industry, there are serious deficiencies in patient safety and quality of care. In the US, the Office of the Inspector General estimated that 22% of Medicare beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities, and 46% in long-term care hospitals experienced adverse events. Over half of these adverse events were thought to be preventable. Reports also suggest that a large majority of nursing homes fail to meet federal quality standards. The most common safety issues in long-term care include pressure ulcers, falls, medication administration errors and nosocomial infection. It has been suggested that the high incidence of adverse events in long-term care compared to hospitals is due to lower levels of staff training, lower staff to resident ratios, longer term stays, and a broader scope of care. In the US, there have long been attempts to improve the quality of long-term care, beginning with the Nursing Home Reform Act in 1987, which imposed federal standards to bolster inspections and nursing home quality enforcement. The 2006 Advancing Excellence in America’s Nursing Homes Campaign, which later morphed into the National Nursing Home Quality Improvement Campaign, was another attempt, which promoted nine goals to improve quality in nursing homes. In 2013 the Commission on Long-term Care adopted 28 public policy recommendations in service delivery, workforce and financing in long-term care. There have also been attempts to measure patient safety in long-term care settings, such as the “Nursing Home Compare” program offered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. However, the scores in these systems have been criticized as having a weak and inconsistent relationship between facility metrics and actual performance. In the US, improvements have been stymied by a general lack of research focused on quality of care and patient safety in long-term care settings, with a specific lack of studies on the effectiveness of improvement initiatives. The large majority of research has concentrated on hospital-based acute care. The COVID-19 pandemic spotlighted the quality and safety of long term care. From the start, nursing homes in the US were centers of outbreaks and excess mortality from COVID-19. Staff and residents of long-term care facilities accounted for 31% of all COVID-19 deaths in the US as of June 20, 2021. Data from more than 20 other nations with significant numbers of long-term care facilities show that they accounted for more than a third of COVID-19 deaths, though housing less than 2% of the population There is a growing body of research on the quality of care and patient safety issues that arose during the pandemic.15–17 It is clear that the pandemic exacerbated existing underlying problems. As stated by one author: “The coronavirus has exposed and amplified a long-standing and larger problem: our failure to value and invest in a safe and effective long-term care system.” Anecdotally, resourcing issues during the pandemic made it commonplace for homes and staff to sidestep basic quality and safety guidelines, leading to a worsening of the already substandard quality and safety protocols in such settings. There are notable exceptions. This issue of the Journal includes a commentary from a continuing care retirement community in New York State. Professor Wilcox, a current resident of the facility, was in a unique position to describe how safety can be maintained during a pandemic. In a rare achievement, his care home has experienced zero COVID-19 deaths. The solution included imposing conservative control measures and frequent testing of residents and staff, prompt contact tracing, and a big bang adoption of vaccine as soon as it became available. Implementation was aided by participation of the managers, experts, and the residents themselves. Editorial","PeriodicalId":73888,"journal":{"name":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","volume":"87 1","pages":"234 - 236"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Patient safety in long-term care facilities and the COVID-19 pandemic\",\"authors\":\"A. Wu, J. McIntyre\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/25160435211059871\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Significant parts of the world are growing old. During this century, several regions will experience a marked increase in the proportion of adults over 65 years old. This transition is well underway in the United States as the so-called baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, began turning 65 in 2011. It is projected that the US population aged 65 and over will reach 83.7 million by 2050, equivalent to more than 20% of the entire population. The US is not unique in this. By 2040, the median age in Japan will be 70, and it is anticipated that Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean will join Europe and North America as having more people older than 60 than children under age 15. The need for long-term care is growing alongside the rapidly aging population. In 2018, over 14 million Americans needed long-term care services. By 2025, it is projected that 1 out of every 5 Americans will be retirement age, and just over half of those individuals will require long-term care. Despite unprecedented growth in the long-term care industry, there are serious deficiencies in patient safety and quality of care. In the US, the Office of the Inspector General estimated that 22% of Medicare beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities, and 46% in long-term care hospitals experienced adverse events. Over half of these adverse events were thought to be preventable. Reports also suggest that a large majority of nursing homes fail to meet federal quality standards. The most common safety issues in long-term care include pressure ulcers, falls, medication administration errors and nosocomial infection. It has been suggested that the high incidence of adverse events in long-term care compared to hospitals is due to lower levels of staff training, lower staff to resident ratios, longer term stays, and a broader scope of care. In the US, there have long been attempts to improve the quality of long-term care, beginning with the Nursing Home Reform Act in 1987, which imposed federal standards to bolster inspections and nursing home quality enforcement. The 2006 Advancing Excellence in America’s Nursing Homes Campaign, which later morphed into the National Nursing Home Quality Improvement Campaign, was another attempt, which promoted nine goals to improve quality in nursing homes. In 2013 the Commission on Long-term Care adopted 28 public policy recommendations in service delivery, workforce and financing in long-term care. There have also been attempts to measure patient safety in long-term care settings, such as the “Nursing Home Compare” program offered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. However, the scores in these systems have been criticized as having a weak and inconsistent relationship between facility metrics and actual performance. In the US, improvements have been stymied by a general lack of research focused on quality of care and patient safety in long-term care settings, with a specific lack of studies on the effectiveness of improvement initiatives. The large majority of research has concentrated on hospital-based acute care. The COVID-19 pandemic spotlighted the quality and safety of long term care. From the start, nursing homes in the US were centers of outbreaks and excess mortality from COVID-19. Staff and residents of long-term care facilities accounted for 31% of all COVID-19 deaths in the US as of June 20, 2021. Data from more than 20 other nations with significant numbers of long-term care facilities show that they accounted for more than a third of COVID-19 deaths, though housing less than 2% of the population There is a growing body of research on the quality of care and patient safety issues that arose during the pandemic.15–17 It is clear that the pandemic exacerbated existing underlying problems. As stated by one author: “The coronavirus has exposed and amplified a long-standing and larger problem: our failure to value and invest in a safe and effective long-term care system.” Anecdotally, resourcing issues during the pandemic made it commonplace for homes and staff to sidestep basic quality and safety guidelines, leading to a worsening of the already substandard quality and safety protocols in such settings. There are notable exceptions. This issue of the Journal includes a commentary from a continuing care retirement community in New York State. Professor Wilcox, a current resident of the facility, was in a unique position to describe how safety can be maintained during a pandemic. In a rare achievement, his care home has experienced zero COVID-19 deaths. The solution included imposing conservative control measures and frequent testing of residents and staff, prompt contact tracing, and a big bang adoption of vaccine as soon as it became available. Implementation was aided by participation of the managers, experts, and the residents themselves. Editorial\",\"PeriodicalId\":73888,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"234 - 236\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-11-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of patient safety and risk management\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211059871\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of patient safety and risk management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/25160435211059871","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
世界上很多地方都在变老。在本世纪,若干区域65岁以上成年人的比例将显著增加。随着1946年至1964年出生的所谓婴儿潮一代在2011年开始步入65岁,这种转变正在美国顺利进行。预计到2050年,美国65岁及以上的人口将达到8370万,相当于美国总人口的20%以上。在这方面,美国并非个例。到2040年,日本的中位年龄将达到70岁,预计亚洲、拉丁美洲和加勒比地区将加入欧洲和北美的行列,60岁以上的人口将超过15岁以下的儿童。随着人口迅速老龄化,对长期护理的需求也在增长。2018年,超过1400万美国人需要长期护理服务。到2025年,预计每5个美国人中就有1人将达到退休年龄,其中略多于一半的人将需要长期护理。尽管长期护理行业出现了前所未有的增长,但在患者安全和护理质量方面存在严重缺陷。在美国,监察长办公室估计,熟练护理机构22%的医疗保险受益人和长期护理医院46%的医疗保险受益人经历过不良事件。超过一半的不良事件被认为是可以预防的。报告还显示,绝大多数养老院未能达到联邦质量标准。长期护理中最常见的安全问题包括压疮、跌倒、药物管理错误和医院感染。有人认为,与医院相比,长期护理中不良事件的发生率较高是由于工作人员培训水平较低、工作人员与住院医生的比例较低、住院时间较长以及护理范围较广。在美国,长期以来一直在努力提高长期护理的质量,从1987年的《养老院改革法案》(Nursing Home Reform Act)开始,该法案规定了联邦标准,以加强对养老院质量的检查和执法。2006年推进美国养老院卓越运动,后来演变为全国养老院质量改善运动,是另一项尝试,提出了提高养老院质量的九个目标。2013年,长期护理委员会通过了28项关于长期护理服务提供、劳动力和融资的公共政策建议。也有人尝试在长期护理环境中衡量病人的安全,比如由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心提供的“养老院比较”项目。然而,这些系统中的分数被批评为在设施指标和实际绩效之间存在薄弱和不一致的关系。在美国,由于普遍缺乏对长期护理环境中护理质量和患者安全的研究,特别是缺乏对改善举措有效性的研究,这些改进一直受到阻碍。绝大多数研究都集中在以医院为基础的急性护理上。2019冠状病毒病大流行凸显了长期护理的质量和安全性。从一开始,美国的养老院就是COVID-19疫情和高死亡率的中心。截至2021年6月20日,长期护理机构的工作人员和居民占美国COVID-19总死亡人数的31%。来自其他20多个拥有大量长期护理机构的国家的数据显示,尽管这些机构的住房不到人口的2%,但它们占COVID-19死亡人数的三分之一以上。关于大流行期间出现的护理质量和患者安全问题的研究越来越多。15-17显然,大流行病加剧了现有的根本问题。正如一位作者所说:“冠状病毒暴露并放大了一个长期存在的更大问题:我们未能重视和投资一个安全有效的长期护理系统。”有趣的是,大流行期间的资源问题使家庭和工作人员经常回避基本的质量和安全准则,导致这种环境中本已不合标准的质量和安全规程恶化。当然也有明显的例外。本期《华尔街日报》包括一篇来自纽约州一个持续护理退休社区的评论。Wilcox教授目前是该设施的一名居民,他在描述如何在大流行期间保持安全方面处于独特的地位。他的疗养院取得了一项罕见的成就,没有人死于COVID-19。解决方案包括采取保守的控制措施,对居民和工作人员进行频繁的检测,及时追踪接触者,以及一旦有疫苗就大规模采用疫苗。管理人员、专家和居民自己的参与有助于实施。编辑
Patient safety in long-term care facilities and the COVID-19 pandemic
Significant parts of the world are growing old. During this century, several regions will experience a marked increase in the proportion of adults over 65 years old. This transition is well underway in the United States as the so-called baby boomers, born between 1946 and 1964, began turning 65 in 2011. It is projected that the US population aged 65 and over will reach 83.7 million by 2050, equivalent to more than 20% of the entire population. The US is not unique in this. By 2040, the median age in Japan will be 70, and it is anticipated that Asia, Latin America and the Caribbean will join Europe and North America as having more people older than 60 than children under age 15. The need for long-term care is growing alongside the rapidly aging population. In 2018, over 14 million Americans needed long-term care services. By 2025, it is projected that 1 out of every 5 Americans will be retirement age, and just over half of those individuals will require long-term care. Despite unprecedented growth in the long-term care industry, there are serious deficiencies in patient safety and quality of care. In the US, the Office of the Inspector General estimated that 22% of Medicare beneficiaries in skilled nursing facilities, and 46% in long-term care hospitals experienced adverse events. Over half of these adverse events were thought to be preventable. Reports also suggest that a large majority of nursing homes fail to meet federal quality standards. The most common safety issues in long-term care include pressure ulcers, falls, medication administration errors and nosocomial infection. It has been suggested that the high incidence of adverse events in long-term care compared to hospitals is due to lower levels of staff training, lower staff to resident ratios, longer term stays, and a broader scope of care. In the US, there have long been attempts to improve the quality of long-term care, beginning with the Nursing Home Reform Act in 1987, which imposed federal standards to bolster inspections and nursing home quality enforcement. The 2006 Advancing Excellence in America’s Nursing Homes Campaign, which later morphed into the National Nursing Home Quality Improvement Campaign, was another attempt, which promoted nine goals to improve quality in nursing homes. In 2013 the Commission on Long-term Care adopted 28 public policy recommendations in service delivery, workforce and financing in long-term care. There have also been attempts to measure patient safety in long-term care settings, such as the “Nursing Home Compare” program offered by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. However, the scores in these systems have been criticized as having a weak and inconsistent relationship between facility metrics and actual performance. In the US, improvements have been stymied by a general lack of research focused on quality of care and patient safety in long-term care settings, with a specific lack of studies on the effectiveness of improvement initiatives. The large majority of research has concentrated on hospital-based acute care. The COVID-19 pandemic spotlighted the quality and safety of long term care. From the start, nursing homes in the US were centers of outbreaks and excess mortality from COVID-19. Staff and residents of long-term care facilities accounted for 31% of all COVID-19 deaths in the US as of June 20, 2021. Data from more than 20 other nations with significant numbers of long-term care facilities show that they accounted for more than a third of COVID-19 deaths, though housing less than 2% of the population There is a growing body of research on the quality of care and patient safety issues that arose during the pandemic.15–17 It is clear that the pandemic exacerbated existing underlying problems. As stated by one author: “The coronavirus has exposed and amplified a long-standing and larger problem: our failure to value and invest in a safe and effective long-term care system.” Anecdotally, resourcing issues during the pandemic made it commonplace for homes and staff to sidestep basic quality and safety guidelines, leading to a worsening of the already substandard quality and safety protocols in such settings. There are notable exceptions. This issue of the Journal includes a commentary from a continuing care retirement community in New York State. Professor Wilcox, a current resident of the facility, was in a unique position to describe how safety can be maintained during a pandemic. In a rare achievement, his care home has experienced zero COVID-19 deaths. The solution included imposing conservative control measures and frequent testing of residents and staff, prompt contact tracing, and a big bang adoption of vaccine as soon as it became available. Implementation was aided by participation of the managers, experts, and the residents themselves. Editorial