{"title":"空间发展战略的制度问题","authors":"E. Bukhvald","doi":"10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 for the period up to 2025 not only remains in the “field of view” of economic theorists and practitioners of public administration, but also in many ways continues to embody the complexity and inconsistency of the strategic planning system in the country. Of course, we have to admit that many of the initial assumptions of the development of this Strategy did not work out quite well. Thus, to date, it has not been possible to adopt the Concept of State Regional Policy, which has been repeatedly proposed in different versions, and on this basis to carry out a meaningful and targeted differentiation of the concepts of “regional” and “spatial” development. Contrary to the logic of the preparation of strategic planning documents, fixed already in the initial version of Federal law No.172, Spatial development strategy was developed and approved in the absence of a “basic” document defining the strategic objectives of the socio-economic development of the country for the future. The actual lack of a deep scientific and public expertise of this Strategy also played a negative role. Formally, there were a lot of different discussions; one draft document was replaced by another over and over again, but the comments and suggestions received were left without due attention, and these discussions did not give a positive result. As a result, it turned out that some variants of the Strategy were discussed, and a completely different one was adopted. As a result, there were more gaps in this Strategy than significant advances. Most of these gaps are still clearly visible today and, of course, need serious elaboration.","PeriodicalId":30952,"journal":{"name":"Perspectives on Federalism","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional Problems of Spatial Development Strategization\",\"authors\":\"E. Bukhvald\",\"doi\":\"10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 for the period up to 2025 not only remains in the “field of view” of economic theorists and practitioners of public administration, but also in many ways continues to embody the complexity and inconsistency of the strategic planning system in the country. Of course, we have to admit that many of the initial assumptions of the development of this Strategy did not work out quite well. Thus, to date, it has not been possible to adopt the Concept of State Regional Policy, which has been repeatedly proposed in different versions, and on this basis to carry out a meaningful and targeted differentiation of the concepts of “regional” and “spatial” development. Contrary to the logic of the preparation of strategic planning documents, fixed already in the initial version of Federal law No.172, Spatial development strategy was developed and approved in the absence of a “basic” document defining the strategic objectives of the socio-economic development of the country for the future. The actual lack of a deep scientific and public expertise of this Strategy also played a negative role. Formally, there were a lot of different discussions; one draft document was replaced by another over and over again, but the comments and suggestions received were left without due attention, and these discussions did not give a positive result. As a result, it turned out that some variants of the Strategy were discussed, and a completely different one was adopted. As a result, there were more gaps in this Strategy than significant advances. Most of these gaps are still clearly visible today and, of course, need serious elaboration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":30952,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Perspectives on Federalism\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Perspectives on Federalism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Perspectives on Federalism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21686/2073-1051-2023-1-80-98","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutional Problems of Spatial Development Strategization
The Spatial Development Strategy of the Russian Federation adopted in 2019 for the period up to 2025 not only remains in the “field of view” of economic theorists and practitioners of public administration, but also in many ways continues to embody the complexity and inconsistency of the strategic planning system in the country. Of course, we have to admit that many of the initial assumptions of the development of this Strategy did not work out quite well. Thus, to date, it has not been possible to adopt the Concept of State Regional Policy, which has been repeatedly proposed in different versions, and on this basis to carry out a meaningful and targeted differentiation of the concepts of “regional” and “spatial” development. Contrary to the logic of the preparation of strategic planning documents, fixed already in the initial version of Federal law No.172, Spatial development strategy was developed and approved in the absence of a “basic” document defining the strategic objectives of the socio-economic development of the country for the future. The actual lack of a deep scientific and public expertise of this Strategy also played a negative role. Formally, there were a lot of different discussions; one draft document was replaced by another over and over again, but the comments and suggestions received were left without due attention, and these discussions did not give a positive result. As a result, it turned out that some variants of the Strategy were discussed, and a completely different one was adopted. As a result, there were more gaps in this Strategy than significant advances. Most of these gaps are still clearly visible today and, of course, need serious elaboration.
期刊介绍:
Perspectives on Federalism is an Open Access peer-reviewed journal, promoted by the Centre for Studies on Federalism. This initiative follows the Bibliographical Bulletin on Federalism’s success, with an average of 15000 individual visits a month. Perspectives on Federalism aims at becoming a leading journal on the subject, and an open forum for interdisciplinary debate about federalism at all levels of government: sub-national, national, and supra-national at both regional and global levels. Perspectives on Federalism is divided into three sections. Along with essays and review articles, which are common to all academic journal, it will also publish very short notes to provide information and updated comments about political, economic and legal issues in federal states, regional organizations, and international organizations at global level, whenever they are relevant to scholars of federalism. We hope scholars from around the world will contribute to this initiative, and we have provided a simple and immediate way to submit an essay, a review article or a note. Perspectives on Federalism will publish original contributions from different disciplinary viewpoints as the subject of federalism requires. Papers submitted will undergo a process of double blind review before eventually being accepted for publication.