先锋型和仿制型肠溶片药物等效性的研究。

F. Ojima, T. Toyoguchi, T. Syoji, Y. Nakagawa
{"title":"先锋型和仿制型肠溶片药物等效性的研究。","authors":"F. Ojima, T. Toyoguchi, T. Syoji, Y. Nakagawa","doi":"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.25.450","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to investigate the pharmaceutical equivalency of four propentofylline enteric-coated tablets (a pioneer preparation and 3 generic preparations), a quantitative analysis, disintegration testing and dissolution testing were all performed to evaluate them.The mean contents of propentofylline in each preparation ranged from 96 to 102%. All of the tested materials conformed to the findings for the disintegration test for enteric-coated articles in the thirteeth revised edition of Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP). However, at the end of the disintegration test with the 1st test medium (pH 1.2), swelling was observed in one or more of the 6 tested tablets for two of the generic preparations. Although no release of propentofylline was recognized, the core of the swollen tablets had completely disintegrated inside the enteric coating film in one of the two swollen generic preparations. When doing the same test aften placing the disks in gastric fluid, the propentofylline finally dissolved in the medium after 120 min. The dissolution test was performed with a paddle (100 rpm) according to JP using a 0.05 M phosphate buffer at pHs of 6.5 and 7.2. The dissolutions were complete in less than 60 min at both pHs, and they were faster at pH 7.2 for all preparations. However, the dissolution was significantly delayed, and the 75% dissolution time was also significantly prolonged for one of the three generic preparations at both pHs when compared to the other preparations.All of the propentofylline enteric-coated preparations were acceptable based on the JP criteria, however, the pharmaceutical equivalency of the generic preparations to the pioneer preparation heve not yet been obtained. As a result, the changes between generic preparations and pioneer preparations are therefore considered to be considerable, especially ragarding enteric coated preparations","PeriodicalId":14621,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","volume":"178 3 1","pages":"450-459"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1999-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of Pharmaceutical Equivalency in Pioneer and Generic Enteric-Coated Tablets.\",\"authors\":\"F. Ojima, T. Toyoguchi, T. Syoji, Y. Nakagawa\",\"doi\":\"10.5649/JJPHCS1975.25.450\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to investigate the pharmaceutical equivalency of four propentofylline enteric-coated tablets (a pioneer preparation and 3 generic preparations), a quantitative analysis, disintegration testing and dissolution testing were all performed to evaluate them.The mean contents of propentofylline in each preparation ranged from 96 to 102%. All of the tested materials conformed to the findings for the disintegration test for enteric-coated articles in the thirteeth revised edition of Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP). However, at the end of the disintegration test with the 1st test medium (pH 1.2), swelling was observed in one or more of the 6 tested tablets for two of the generic preparations. Although no release of propentofylline was recognized, the core of the swollen tablets had completely disintegrated inside the enteric coating film in one of the two swollen generic preparations. When doing the same test aften placing the disks in gastric fluid, the propentofylline finally dissolved in the medium after 120 min. The dissolution test was performed with a paddle (100 rpm) according to JP using a 0.05 M phosphate buffer at pHs of 6.5 and 7.2. The dissolutions were complete in less than 60 min at both pHs, and they were faster at pH 7.2 for all preparations. However, the dissolution was significantly delayed, and the 75% dissolution time was also significantly prolonged for one of the three generic preparations at both pHs when compared to the other preparations.All of the propentofylline enteric-coated preparations were acceptable based on the JP criteria, however, the pharmaceutical equivalency of the generic preparations to the pioneer preparation heve not yet been obtained. As a result, the changes between generic preparations and pioneer preparations are therefore considered to be considerable, especially ragarding enteric coated preparations\",\"PeriodicalId\":14621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"178 3 1\",\"pages\":\"450-459\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1999-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.25.450\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Hospital Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5649/JJPHCS1975.25.450","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了考察4种丙烯茶碱肠溶片(1种先锋制剂和3种仿制制剂)的药物等效性,对其进行了定量分析、崩解试验和溶出度试验。各制剂中丙烯茶碱的平均含量为96% ~ 102%。试验材料均符合日本药典(JP)第13版肠溶包衣崩解试验结果。然而,在用第一种试验介质(pH 1.2)进行崩解试验结束时,两种仿制制剂的6个被试片中有一个或多个出现肿胀。虽然没有发现丙烯茶碱的释放,但在两种肿胀仿制药中,有一种肿胀片的核心在肠包衣膜内完全崩解。将膜片置于胃液中进行同样的测试,120分钟后丙烯茶碱最终溶解于培养基中。根据JP使用0.05 M磷酸盐缓冲液,在ph为6.5和7.2时,用桨(100 rpm)进行溶解试验。在两种pH下,溶解均在60分钟内完成,在pH为7.2时,溶解速度更快。然而,与其他制剂相比,三种仿制制剂中有一种在两种ph值下的溶出时间明显延迟,75%的溶出时间也明显延长。根据JP标准,所有丙烯酚肠溶制剂均可接受,然而,尚未获得仿制制剂与先驱制剂的药物等效性。因此,仿制制剂和先锋制剂之间的变化被认为是相当大的,特别是肠溶包衣制剂
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Investigation of Pharmaceutical Equivalency in Pioneer and Generic Enteric-Coated Tablets.
In order to investigate the pharmaceutical equivalency of four propentofylline enteric-coated tablets (a pioneer preparation and 3 generic preparations), a quantitative analysis, disintegration testing and dissolution testing were all performed to evaluate them.The mean contents of propentofylline in each preparation ranged from 96 to 102%. All of the tested materials conformed to the findings for the disintegration test for enteric-coated articles in the thirteeth revised edition of Japanese Pharmacopoeia (JP). However, at the end of the disintegration test with the 1st test medium (pH 1.2), swelling was observed in one or more of the 6 tested tablets for two of the generic preparations. Although no release of propentofylline was recognized, the core of the swollen tablets had completely disintegrated inside the enteric coating film in one of the two swollen generic preparations. When doing the same test aften placing the disks in gastric fluid, the propentofylline finally dissolved in the medium after 120 min. The dissolution test was performed with a paddle (100 rpm) according to JP using a 0.05 M phosphate buffer at pHs of 6.5 and 7.2. The dissolutions were complete in less than 60 min at both pHs, and they were faster at pH 7.2 for all preparations. However, the dissolution was significantly delayed, and the 75% dissolution time was also significantly prolonged for one of the three generic preparations at both pHs when compared to the other preparations.All of the propentofylline enteric-coated preparations were acceptable based on the JP criteria, however, the pharmaceutical equivalency of the generic preparations to the pioneer preparation heve not yet been obtained. As a result, the changes between generic preparations and pioneer preparations are therefore considered to be considerable, especially ragarding enteric coated preparations
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信