回到未来:大流行后的工作和管理

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR
C. Rowley
{"title":"回到未来:大流行后的工作和管理","authors":"C. Rowley","doi":"10.1108/pr-11-2022-0770","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeAs the world emerges from the COVID-19 global pandemic and medical emergency, the author looks at the impacts on the world of work and its management and also tries to set them in some context. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned idea.Design/methodology/approachThe author uses some of the latest global and comparative media and survey research as well as some theories to explore the topic of post-pandemic work and management.FindingsWork – and its management – is impacted on by crisis, such as the pandemic, for twin inter-locking reasons. First, it engenders uncertainty, which comes in different degrees and levels and variability in people's comfortableness with it. Second, the commensurate jolt of a crisis can block existing models and force common experimentation, even in areas previously resisted, such as more flexible working patterns. There are a variety of short and longer term reasons for both changes to work and management and also responses and commitment to them by management and organisations.Originality/valueThe author details the impact of both the COVID-19 pandemic and wider contextual changes on the world of work. The author notes a set of reasons, both practical and theoretical, as to why flexible or hybrid working, while sometimes seen as a problem, can work. The author shows that rather than a simple “either-or” dichotomy in choice and support for post-pandemic work arrangements, there is a range of options.","PeriodicalId":48148,"journal":{"name":"Personnel Review","volume":"35 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Back to the future: post-pandemic work and management\",\"authors\":\"C. Rowley\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/pr-11-2022-0770\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"PurposeAs the world emerges from the COVID-19 global pandemic and medical emergency, the author looks at the impacts on the world of work and its management and also tries to set them in some context. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned idea.Design/methodology/approachThe author uses some of the latest global and comparative media and survey research as well as some theories to explore the topic of post-pandemic work and management.FindingsWork – and its management – is impacted on by crisis, such as the pandemic, for twin inter-locking reasons. First, it engenders uncertainty, which comes in different degrees and levels and variability in people's comfortableness with it. Second, the commensurate jolt of a crisis can block existing models and force common experimentation, even in areas previously resisted, such as more flexible working patterns. There are a variety of short and longer term reasons for both changes to work and management and also responses and commitment to them by management and organisations.Originality/valueThe author details the impact of both the COVID-19 pandemic and wider contextual changes on the world of work. The author notes a set of reasons, both practical and theoretical, as to why flexible or hybrid working, while sometimes seen as a problem, can work. The author shows that rather than a simple “either-or” dichotomy in choice and support for post-pandemic work arrangements, there is a range of options.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48148,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Personnel Review\",\"volume\":\"35 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Personnel Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-11-2022-0770\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Personnel Review","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/pr-11-2022-0770","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS & LABOR","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

随着世界从COVID-19全球大流行和医疗紧急情况中走出来,作者着眼于对工作世界及其管理的影响,并试图将其置于某种背景下。本研究旨在探讨上述观点。设计/方法/方法作者利用一些最新的全球和比较媒体和调查研究以及一些理论来探讨大流行后的工作和管理主题。由于双重相互关联的原因,疫情等危机对工作及其管理产生了影响。首先,它产生了不确定性,这种不确定性以不同的程度和水平出现,人们对它的适应程度也不尽相同。其次,危机带来的相应冲击可能会阻碍现有模式,迫使人们进行共同的实验,即使是在以前受到抵制的领域,比如更灵活的工作模式。工作和管理的变化以及管理层和组织对这些变化的反应和承诺有各种短期和长期的原因。作者详细介绍了COVID-19大流行和更广泛的背景变化对工作世界的影响。作者指出了一系列实际的和理论上的原因,来解释为什么弹性工作制或混合工作制虽然有时被视为一个问题,但可以奏效。提交人表明,在选择和支持大流行后的工作安排方面,并非简单的“非此即彼”二分法,而是有一系列选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Back to the future: post-pandemic work and management
PurposeAs the world emerges from the COVID-19 global pandemic and medical emergency, the author looks at the impacts on the world of work and its management and also tries to set them in some context. This study aims to discuss the aforementioned idea.Design/methodology/approachThe author uses some of the latest global and comparative media and survey research as well as some theories to explore the topic of post-pandemic work and management.FindingsWork – and its management – is impacted on by crisis, such as the pandemic, for twin inter-locking reasons. First, it engenders uncertainty, which comes in different degrees and levels and variability in people's comfortableness with it. Second, the commensurate jolt of a crisis can block existing models and force common experimentation, even in areas previously resisted, such as more flexible working patterns. There are a variety of short and longer term reasons for both changes to work and management and also responses and commitment to them by management and organisations.Originality/valueThe author details the impact of both the COVID-19 pandemic and wider contextual changes on the world of work. The author notes a set of reasons, both practical and theoretical, as to why flexible or hybrid working, while sometimes seen as a problem, can work. The author shows that rather than a simple “either-or” dichotomy in choice and support for post-pandemic work arrangements, there is a range of options.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Personnel Review
Personnel Review Multiple-
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
7.70%
发文量
133
期刊介绍: Personnel Review (PR) publishes rigorous, well written articles from a range of theoretical and methodological traditions. We value articles that have high originality and that engage with contemporary challenges to human resource management theory, policy and practice development. Research that highlights innovation and emerging issues in the field, and the medium- to long-term impact of HRM policy and practice, is especially welcome.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信