{"title":"评估控制野猫的方法,以尽量减少对汤顿国家公园的非目标影响(科学)","authors":"John Augusteyn, Barry Nolan","doi":"10.1111/emr.12536","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Feral Cat (<i>Felis catus</i>) (cat) is a predator of the Bridled Nail-Tailed Wallaby (BNTW) (<i>Onychogalea frenata</i>) living at Taunton National Park (Scientific) (Taunton). The aim of this study was to determine if traps and poison baits could be used to control feral cats without impacting non-target species at Taunton. The techniques trialled included poison fresh meat baits and several types of traps presented in different ways and with various lures. Thirty-one percent of fresh meat baits was taken during bait uptake trials; corvids removed 40% of these and dogs removed 16%. Cats were not detected, on camera traps, taking a bait. The elevated soft-jaw traps (81 trap nights/cat) and single-entry cage traps (98 trap nights/cat) were found to be the most successful of all the trap types trialled and had low amounts of by-catch. Other trap types trialled took more than 166 trap nights to catch a cat. The elevated soft-jaw trap configurations had the lowest amount of by-catch (avg. 0.33%), and the log trap had the highest amount of by-catch (1%). Ground-set traps successfully trapped cats (305 trap nights/cat) but caught more by-catch (0.9%) compared to the elevated soft-jaw trap types and most wallabies caught in these traps had to be euthanised.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":54325,"journal":{"name":"Ecological Management & Restoration","volume":"23 1","pages":"43-52"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluating methods for controlling feral cats that minimise non-target impacts at Taunton National Park (Scientific)\",\"authors\":\"John Augusteyn, Barry Nolan\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/emr.12536\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Feral Cat (<i>Felis catus</i>) (cat) is a predator of the Bridled Nail-Tailed Wallaby (BNTW) (<i>Onychogalea frenata</i>) living at Taunton National Park (Scientific) (Taunton). The aim of this study was to determine if traps and poison baits could be used to control feral cats without impacting non-target species at Taunton. The techniques trialled included poison fresh meat baits and several types of traps presented in different ways and with various lures. Thirty-one percent of fresh meat baits was taken during bait uptake trials; corvids removed 40% of these and dogs removed 16%. Cats were not detected, on camera traps, taking a bait. The elevated soft-jaw traps (81 trap nights/cat) and single-entry cage traps (98 trap nights/cat) were found to be the most successful of all the trap types trialled and had low amounts of by-catch. Other trap types trialled took more than 166 trap nights to catch a cat. The elevated soft-jaw trap configurations had the lowest amount of by-catch (avg. 0.33%), and the log trap had the highest amount of by-catch (1%). Ground-set traps successfully trapped cats (305 trap nights/cat) but caught more by-catch (0.9%) compared to the elevated soft-jaw trap types and most wallabies caught in these traps had to be euthanised.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"43-52\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ecological Management & Restoration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12536\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ECOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ecological Management & Restoration","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/emr.12536","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Evaluating methods for controlling feral cats that minimise non-target impacts at Taunton National Park (Scientific)
Feral Cat (Felis catus) (cat) is a predator of the Bridled Nail-Tailed Wallaby (BNTW) (Onychogalea frenata) living at Taunton National Park (Scientific) (Taunton). The aim of this study was to determine if traps and poison baits could be used to control feral cats without impacting non-target species at Taunton. The techniques trialled included poison fresh meat baits and several types of traps presented in different ways and with various lures. Thirty-one percent of fresh meat baits was taken during bait uptake trials; corvids removed 40% of these and dogs removed 16%. Cats were not detected, on camera traps, taking a bait. The elevated soft-jaw traps (81 trap nights/cat) and single-entry cage traps (98 trap nights/cat) were found to be the most successful of all the trap types trialled and had low amounts of by-catch. Other trap types trialled took more than 166 trap nights to catch a cat. The elevated soft-jaw trap configurations had the lowest amount of by-catch (avg. 0.33%), and the log trap had the highest amount of by-catch (1%). Ground-set traps successfully trapped cats (305 trap nights/cat) but caught more by-catch (0.9%) compared to the elevated soft-jaw trap types and most wallabies caught in these traps had to be euthanised.
期刊介绍:
Ecological Management & Restoration is a peer-reviewed journal with the dual aims of (i) reporting the latest science to assist ecologically appropriate management and restoration actions and (ii) providing a forum for reporting on these actions. Guided by an editorial board made up of researchers and practitioners, EMR seeks features, topical opinion pieces, research reports, short notes and project summaries applicable to Australasian ecosystems to encourage more regionally-appropriate management. Where relevant, contributions should draw on international science and practice and highlight any relevance to the global challenge of integrating biodiversity conservation in a rapidly changing world.
Topic areas:
Improved management and restoration of plant communities, fauna and habitat; coastal, marine and riparian zones; restoration ethics and philosophy; planning; monitoring and assessment; policy and legislation; landscape pattern and design; integrated ecosystems management; socio-economic issues and solutions; techniques and methodology; threatened species; genetic issues; indigenous land management; weeds and feral animal control; landscape arts and aesthetics; education and communication; community involvement.