{"title":"基于新型顺序交易的信用卡欺诈交易预测:光梯度增强算法与隔离森林算法的比较","authors":"P. R. Reddy, A. S. Kumar","doi":"10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Aim of the work is to predict the accuracy of credit card fraudulent detection using Sequential transactions by comparing Light Gradient Booster over Isolation Forest. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm per sample size of 10 and Isolation Forest (IF) with sample size of 10 was repeated for identifying the accuracy percentage of credit card fraudulent transactions. The sigmoid function used in the Light Gradient Booster Algorithm maps the values between 0 and 1. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm has better accuracy (91.6%) when compared to Isolation Forest (81.8%). There is a statistical significant difference between Light Gradient Booster Algorithm and Isolation Forest with p=0.0001 (p<0.05) based on 2-tailed analysis. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm shows a better accuracy percentage of credit card fraudulent transactions than Isolation Forest.","PeriodicalId":6810,"journal":{"name":"2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)","volume":"32 1","pages":"563-567"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Credit Card Fraudulent Transactions Prediction Using Novel Sequential Transactions by Comparing Light Gradient Booster Algorithm Over Isolation Forest Algorithm\",\"authors\":\"P. R. Reddy, A. S. Kumar\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754211\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Aim of the work is to predict the accuracy of credit card fraudulent detection using Sequential transactions by comparing Light Gradient Booster over Isolation Forest. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm per sample size of 10 and Isolation Forest (IF) with sample size of 10 was repeated for identifying the accuracy percentage of credit card fraudulent transactions. The sigmoid function used in the Light Gradient Booster Algorithm maps the values between 0 and 1. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm has better accuracy (91.6%) when compared to Isolation Forest (81.8%). There is a statistical significant difference between Light Gradient Booster Algorithm and Isolation Forest with p=0.0001 (p<0.05) based on 2-tailed analysis. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm shows a better accuracy percentage of credit card fraudulent transactions than Isolation Forest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":6810,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)\",\"volume\":\"32 1\",\"pages\":\"563-567\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-02-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754211\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 2nd International Conference on Innovative Practices in Technology and Management (ICIPTM)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/iciptm54933.2022.9754211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Credit Card Fraudulent Transactions Prediction Using Novel Sequential Transactions by Comparing Light Gradient Booster Algorithm Over Isolation Forest Algorithm
The Aim of the work is to predict the accuracy of credit card fraudulent detection using Sequential transactions by comparing Light Gradient Booster over Isolation Forest. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm per sample size of 10 and Isolation Forest (IF) with sample size of 10 was repeated for identifying the accuracy percentage of credit card fraudulent transactions. The sigmoid function used in the Light Gradient Booster Algorithm maps the values between 0 and 1. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm has better accuracy (91.6%) when compared to Isolation Forest (81.8%). There is a statistical significant difference between Light Gradient Booster Algorithm and Isolation Forest with p=0.0001 (p<0.05) based on 2-tailed analysis. Light Gradient Booster Algorithm shows a better accuracy percentage of credit card fraudulent transactions than Isolation Forest.