Z. Hosseini, Hooman Latifi, H. Naghavi, Siavash Bakhtiarvand Bakhtiari, F. Fassnacht
{"title":"利用非常高分辨率立体卫星图像估算人工林地上生物量时样地和样本量的影响","authors":"Z. Hosseini, Hooman Latifi, H. Naghavi, Siavash Bakhtiarvand Bakhtiari, F. Fassnacht","doi":"10.1093/forestry/cpaa028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Regular biomass estimations for natural and plantation forests are important to support sustainable forestry and\r\nto calculate carbon-related statistics. The application of remote sensing data to estimate biomass of forests has\r\nbeen amply demonstrated but there is still space for increasing the efficiency of current approaches. Here, we\r\ninvestigated the influence of field plot and sample sizes on the accuracy of random forest models trained with\r\ninformation derived from Pleiades very high resolution (VHR) stereo images applied to plantation forests in an\r\narid environment. We collected field data at 311 locations with three different plot area sizes (100, 300 and\r\n500 m2). In two experiments, we demonstrate how plot and sample sizes influence the accuracy of biomass\r\nestimation models. In the first experiment, we compared model accuracies obtained with varying plot sizes but\r\nconstant number of samples. In the second experiment, we fixed the total area to be sampled to account for\r\nthe additional effort to collect large field plots. Our results for the first experiment show that model performance\r\nmetrics Spearman’s r, RMSErel and RMSEnor improve from 0.61, 0.70 and 0.36 at a sample size of 24–0.79, 0.51\r\nand 0.15 at a sample size of 192, respectively. In the second experiment, highest accuracies were obtained with\r\na plot size of 100 m2 (most samples) with Spearman’s r =0.77, RMSErel =0.59 and RMSEnor =0.15. Results from\r\nan analysis of variance type-II suggest that the overall most important factors to explain model performance\r\nmetrics for our biomass models is sample size. Our results suggest no clear advantage for any plot size to reach\r\naccurate biomass estimates using VHR stereo imagery in plantations. This is an important finding, which partly\r\ncontradicts the suggestions of earlier studies but requires validation for other forest types and remote sensing\r\ndata types (e.g. LiDAR).","PeriodicalId":12342,"journal":{"name":"Forestry","volume":"9 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Influence of plot and sample sizes on aboveground biomass estimations in plantation forests using very high resolution stereo satellite imagery\",\"authors\":\"Z. Hosseini, Hooman Latifi, H. Naghavi, Siavash Bakhtiarvand Bakhtiari, F. Fassnacht\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/forestry/cpaa028\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Regular biomass estimations for natural and plantation forests are important to support sustainable forestry and\\r\\nto calculate carbon-related statistics. The application of remote sensing data to estimate biomass of forests has\\r\\nbeen amply demonstrated but there is still space for increasing the efficiency of current approaches. Here, we\\r\\ninvestigated the influence of field plot and sample sizes on the accuracy of random forest models trained with\\r\\ninformation derived from Pleiades very high resolution (VHR) stereo images applied to plantation forests in an\\r\\narid environment. We collected field data at 311 locations with three different plot area sizes (100, 300 and\\r\\n500 m2). In two experiments, we demonstrate how plot and sample sizes influence the accuracy of biomass\\r\\nestimation models. In the first experiment, we compared model accuracies obtained with varying plot sizes but\\r\\nconstant number of samples. In the second experiment, we fixed the total area to be sampled to account for\\r\\nthe additional effort to collect large field plots. Our results for the first experiment show that model performance\\r\\nmetrics Spearman’s r, RMSErel and RMSEnor improve from 0.61, 0.70 and 0.36 at a sample size of 24–0.79, 0.51\\r\\nand 0.15 at a sample size of 192, respectively. In the second experiment, highest accuracies were obtained with\\r\\na plot size of 100 m2 (most samples) with Spearman’s r =0.77, RMSErel =0.59 and RMSEnor =0.15. Results from\\r\\nan analysis of variance type-II suggest that the overall most important factors to explain model performance\\r\\nmetrics for our biomass models is sample size. Our results suggest no clear advantage for any plot size to reach\\r\\naccurate biomass estimates using VHR stereo imagery in plantations. This is an important finding, which partly\\r\\ncontradicts the suggestions of earlier studies but requires validation for other forest types and remote sensing\\r\\ndata types (e.g. LiDAR).\",\"PeriodicalId\":12342,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Forestry\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-07-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Forestry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa028\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FORESTRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forestry","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/forestry/cpaa028","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FORESTRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Influence of plot and sample sizes on aboveground biomass estimations in plantation forests using very high resolution stereo satellite imagery
Regular biomass estimations for natural and plantation forests are important to support sustainable forestry and
to calculate carbon-related statistics. The application of remote sensing data to estimate biomass of forests has
been amply demonstrated but there is still space for increasing the efficiency of current approaches. Here, we
investigated the influence of field plot and sample sizes on the accuracy of random forest models trained with
information derived from Pleiades very high resolution (VHR) stereo images applied to plantation forests in an
arid environment. We collected field data at 311 locations with three different plot area sizes (100, 300 and
500 m2). In two experiments, we demonstrate how plot and sample sizes influence the accuracy of biomass
estimation models. In the first experiment, we compared model accuracies obtained with varying plot sizes but
constant number of samples. In the second experiment, we fixed the total area to be sampled to account for
the additional effort to collect large field plots. Our results for the first experiment show that model performance
metrics Spearman’s r, RMSErel and RMSEnor improve from 0.61, 0.70 and 0.36 at a sample size of 24–0.79, 0.51
and 0.15 at a sample size of 192, respectively. In the second experiment, highest accuracies were obtained with
a plot size of 100 m2 (most samples) with Spearman’s r =0.77, RMSErel =0.59 and RMSEnor =0.15. Results from
an analysis of variance type-II suggest that the overall most important factors to explain model performance
metrics for our biomass models is sample size. Our results suggest no clear advantage for any plot size to reach
accurate biomass estimates using VHR stereo imagery in plantations. This is an important finding, which partly
contradicts the suggestions of earlier studies but requires validation for other forest types and remote sensing
data types (e.g. LiDAR).
期刊介绍:
The journal is inclusive of all subjects, geographical zones and study locations, including trees in urban environments, plantations and natural forests. We welcome papers that consider economic, environmental and social factors and, in particular, studies that take an integrated approach to sustainable management. In considering suitability for publication, attention is given to the originality of contributions and their likely impact on policy and practice, as well as their contribution to the development of knowledge.
Special Issues - each year one edition of Forestry will be a Special Issue and will focus on one subject in detail; this will usually be by publication of the proceedings of an international meeting.