芝加哥大学法学院:反思与回忆

IF 1.9 2区 社会学 Q1 LAW
B. D. Meltzer
{"title":"芝加哥大学法学院:反思与回忆","authors":"B. D. Meltzer","doi":"10.2307/1600556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I have, I believe, been given the privilege of writing for this centennial issue primarily because of my well-aged and affectionate ties to the University of Chicago Law School. In 1934, I became a firstyear student there and thus began a connection spanning more than two-thirds of the Law School's existence. My connection as a faculty member began in 1946; and, if I may count my days as an emeritus (beginning in 1985), I have been on the faculty for more than one-half of the school's existence. Naturally, I have heard, repeated, and created a good deal of hearsay regarding the school, beginning with its founding. My memories of later events that I actually observed may, of course, have improved with age. Furthermore, they have undoubtedly been reshaped by hindsight. In any event, the core of much of what follows will be an old story to some of you. My working principle for birthday parties, and especially centennials, is nostalgia rather than novelty. Indeed, I am concerned that I may help validate Paul Freund's observation that nostalgia is not what it used to be. I will say something about three topics: (1) the birth pangs of the Law School, (2) my student days, and (3) the post-World War II reinvigoration of the Law School that reflected and reinforced its original conception of a broad-gauged legal education. My stopping point will, in general, be 1962, when Edward Levi left the deanship of the Law School in order to become Provost of the University.","PeriodicalId":51436,"journal":{"name":"University of Chicago Law Review","volume":"47 1","pages":"233-258"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2003-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The University of Chicago Law School: Ruminations and Reminiscences\",\"authors\":\"B. D. Meltzer\",\"doi\":\"10.2307/1600556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"I have, I believe, been given the privilege of writing for this centennial issue primarily because of my well-aged and affectionate ties to the University of Chicago Law School. In 1934, I became a firstyear student there and thus began a connection spanning more than two-thirds of the Law School's existence. My connection as a faculty member began in 1946; and, if I may count my days as an emeritus (beginning in 1985), I have been on the faculty for more than one-half of the school's existence. Naturally, I have heard, repeated, and created a good deal of hearsay regarding the school, beginning with its founding. My memories of later events that I actually observed may, of course, have improved with age. Furthermore, they have undoubtedly been reshaped by hindsight. In any event, the core of much of what follows will be an old story to some of you. My working principle for birthday parties, and especially centennials, is nostalgia rather than novelty. Indeed, I am concerned that I may help validate Paul Freund's observation that nostalgia is not what it used to be. I will say something about three topics: (1) the birth pangs of the Law School, (2) my student days, and (3) the post-World War II reinvigoration of the Law School that reflected and reinforced its original conception of a broad-gauged legal education. My stopping point will, in general, be 1962, when Edward Levi left the deanship of the Law School in order to become Provost of the University.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51436,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"University of Chicago Law Review\",\"volume\":\"47 1\",\"pages\":\"233-258\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"University of Chicago Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2307/1600556\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"University of Chicago Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2307/1600556","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

我相信,我之所以有幸为这期百年特刊撰稿,主要是因为我与芝加哥大学法学院有着长久而深厚的渊源。1934年,我成为那里的一年级学生,从此开始了一段跨越法学院三分之二以上历史的联系。我的教职生涯始于1946年;如果我可以算上我退休的日子的话(从1985年开始),我在学校的教职时间已经超过了一半。当然,从这所学校成立开始,我就听到、重复并编造了许多关于它的传闻。当然,我对后来实际观察到的事件的记忆可能会随着年龄的增长而增强。此外,毫无疑问,事后诸葛亮重塑了它们。在任何情况下,接下来的核心内容对你们中的一些人来说都是一个古老的故事。我的生日派对,尤其是百岁生日派对的工作原则是怀旧而不是新奇。事实上,我担心我可能有助于证实保罗·弗洛伊德(Paul Freund)的观察,即怀旧已今不如昔。我将谈三个主题:(1)法学院诞生的阵痛,(2)我的学生时代,以及(3)二战后法学院的复兴,这反映并加强了它最初的广泛法律教育理念。总的来说,我的结束点是1962年,爱德华·利瓦伊辞去法学院院长的职务,成为哈佛大学的教务长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The University of Chicago Law School: Ruminations and Reminiscences
I have, I believe, been given the privilege of writing for this centennial issue primarily because of my well-aged and affectionate ties to the University of Chicago Law School. In 1934, I became a firstyear student there and thus began a connection spanning more than two-thirds of the Law School's existence. My connection as a faculty member began in 1946; and, if I may count my days as an emeritus (beginning in 1985), I have been on the faculty for more than one-half of the school's existence. Naturally, I have heard, repeated, and created a good deal of hearsay regarding the school, beginning with its founding. My memories of later events that I actually observed may, of course, have improved with age. Furthermore, they have undoubtedly been reshaped by hindsight. In any event, the core of much of what follows will be an old story to some of you. My working principle for birthday parties, and especially centennials, is nostalgia rather than novelty. Indeed, I am concerned that I may help validate Paul Freund's observation that nostalgia is not what it used to be. I will say something about three topics: (1) the birth pangs of the Law School, (2) my student days, and (3) the post-World War II reinvigoration of the Law School that reflected and reinforced its original conception of a broad-gauged legal education. My stopping point will, in general, be 1962, when Edward Levi left the deanship of the Law School in order to become Provost of the University.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.00%
发文量
2
期刊介绍: The University of Chicago Law Review is a quarterly journal of legal scholarship. Often cited in Supreme Court and other court opinions, as well as in other scholarly works, it is among the most influential journals in the field. Students have full responsibility for editing and publishing the Law Review; they also contribute original scholarship of their own. The Law Review"s editorial board selects all pieces for publication and, with the assistance of staff members, performs substantive and technical edits on each of these pieces prior to publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信