{"title":"研究类圆线虫发育开关的方法——超越道尔假说","authors":"Mark Viney, Robert Morris","doi":"10.1016/j.molbiopara.2022.111477","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><em>Strongyloides’</em> developmental switch between direct, parasitic and indirect, free-living development has intrigued, confused, and fascinated biologists since it was first discovered more than 100 years ago. Proximately, the switch is controlled by environmental conditions that developing larvae are exposed to, but genotypes differ in their sensitivity to these cues. Ultimately, selection will act on this switch to generate a direct <em>vs.</em> indirect phenotype that maximises a genotype’s fitness, but we have a poor understanding of the relative fitness advantages of these different routes of development. Mechanistically, the switch senses and transduces environmental cues, integrates signals that are then used to make a developmental decision which is then enacted. Seeking to understand the molecular form of this process has focussed on the <em>C. elegans</em> dauer hypothesis, but this has been found to be wanting. So, we argue that the time has come to move beyond the dauer hypothesis and better refine our question to ask: What is it that controls the variation in developmental switching among <em>Strongyloides</em> genotypes? We discuss approaches to achieve this research aim that now lies within our grasp.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18721,"journal":{"name":"Molecular and biochemical parasitology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166685122000317/pdfft?md5=feb5dbcc611e908655b3067dd921f450&pid=1-s2.0-S0166685122000317-main.pdf","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Approaches to studying the developmental switch of Strongyloides – Moving beyond the dauer hypothesis\",\"authors\":\"Mark Viney, Robert Morris\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.molbiopara.2022.111477\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p><em>Strongyloides’</em> developmental switch between direct, parasitic and indirect, free-living development has intrigued, confused, and fascinated biologists since it was first discovered more than 100 years ago. Proximately, the switch is controlled by environmental conditions that developing larvae are exposed to, but genotypes differ in their sensitivity to these cues. Ultimately, selection will act on this switch to generate a direct <em>vs.</em> indirect phenotype that maximises a genotype’s fitness, but we have a poor understanding of the relative fitness advantages of these different routes of development. Mechanistically, the switch senses and transduces environmental cues, integrates signals that are then used to make a developmental decision which is then enacted. Seeking to understand the molecular form of this process has focussed on the <em>C. elegans</em> dauer hypothesis, but this has been found to be wanting. So, we argue that the time has come to move beyond the dauer hypothesis and better refine our question to ask: What is it that controls the variation in developmental switching among <em>Strongyloides</em> genotypes? We discuss approaches to achieve this research aim that now lies within our grasp.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18721,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Molecular and biochemical parasitology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166685122000317/pdfft?md5=feb5dbcc611e908655b3067dd921f450&pid=1-s2.0-S0166685122000317-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Molecular and biochemical parasitology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166685122000317\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Molecular and biochemical parasitology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0166685122000317","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Approaches to studying the developmental switch of Strongyloides – Moving beyond the dauer hypothesis
Strongyloides’ developmental switch between direct, parasitic and indirect, free-living development has intrigued, confused, and fascinated biologists since it was first discovered more than 100 years ago. Proximately, the switch is controlled by environmental conditions that developing larvae are exposed to, but genotypes differ in their sensitivity to these cues. Ultimately, selection will act on this switch to generate a direct vs. indirect phenotype that maximises a genotype’s fitness, but we have a poor understanding of the relative fitness advantages of these different routes of development. Mechanistically, the switch senses and transduces environmental cues, integrates signals that are then used to make a developmental decision which is then enacted. Seeking to understand the molecular form of this process has focussed on the C. elegans dauer hypothesis, but this has been found to be wanting. So, we argue that the time has come to move beyond the dauer hypothesis and better refine our question to ask: What is it that controls the variation in developmental switching among Strongyloides genotypes? We discuss approaches to achieve this research aim that now lies within our grasp.
期刊介绍:
The journal provides a medium for rapid publication of investigations of the molecular biology and biochemistry of parasitic protozoa and helminths and their interactions with both the definitive and intermediate host. The main subject areas covered are:
• the structure, biosynthesis, degradation, properties and function of DNA, RNA, proteins, lipids, carbohydrates and small molecular-weight substances
• intermediary metabolism and bioenergetics
• drug target characterization and the mode of action of antiparasitic drugs
• molecular and biochemical aspects of membrane structure and function
• host-parasite relationships that focus on the parasite, particularly as related to specific parasite molecules.
• analysis of genes and genome structure, function and expression
• analysis of variation in parasite populations relevant to genetic exchange, pathogenesis, drug and vaccine target characterization, and drug resistance.
• parasite protein trafficking, organelle biogenesis, and cellular structure especially with reference to the roles of specific molecules
• parasite programmed cell death, development, and cell division at the molecular level.