扎根理论研究设计:对实践和程序的调查

Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Pub Date : 2018-01-24 DOI:10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849

Stephen V. Flynn, James S. Korcuska

{"title":"扎根理论研究设计:对实践和程序的调查","authors":"Stephen V. Flynn, James S. Korcuska","doi":"10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT We engaged in a 3-phase meta-methodology review of grounded theory research design and practices referenced in the literature, which were validated by an expert sample. Following an initial scoping review of qualitative literature and a 15-year evidence map, we used an embedded quantitative approach to examine expert appraisal of grounded theory construct relevance. The results postulate a unique format in which grounded theory research is conceptualized and created.","PeriodicalId":37884,"journal":{"name":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","volume":"158 1","pages":"102 - 116"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Grounded Theory Research Design: An Investigation into Practices and Procedures\",\"authors\":\"Stephen V. Flynn, James S. Korcuska\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT We engaged in a 3-phase meta-methodology review of grounded theory research design and practices referenced in the literature, which were validated by an expert sample. Following an initial scoping review of qualitative literature and a 15-year evidence map, we used an embedded quantitative approach to examine expert appraisal of grounded theory construct relevance. The results postulate a unique format in which grounded theory research is conceptualized and created.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"volume\":\"158 1\",\"pages\":\"102 - 116\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-24\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21501378.2017.1403849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 10

摘要

我们对文献中引用的扎根理论、研究设计和实践进行了三阶段的元方法回顾，并通过专家样本进行了验证。在对定性文献和15年证据图进行初步范围审查后，我们使用嵌入式定量方法来检查专家对扎根理论构建相关性的评价。结果假设了一种独特的形式，在这种形式中，扎根理论研究被概念化和创造。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Grounded Theory Research Design: An Investigation into Practices and Procedures

ABSTRACT We engaged in a 3-phase meta-methodology review of grounded theory research design and practices referenced in the literature, which were validated by an expert sample. Following an initial scoping review of qualitative literature and a 15-year evidence map, we used an embedded quantitative approach to examine expert appraisal of grounded theory construct relevance. The results postulate a unique format in which grounded theory research is conceptualized and created.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation Psychology-Psychology (all)

CiteScore

4.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Counseling Outcome Research and Evaluation (CORE) provides counselor educators, researchers, educators, and other mental health practitioners with outcome research and program evaluation practices for work with individuals across the lifespan. It addresses topics such as: treatment efficacy, clinical diagnosis, program evaluation, research design, outcome measure reviews. This journal also serves to address ethical, legal, and cultural concerns in the assessment of dependent variables, implementation of clinical interventions, and outcome research. Manuscripts typically fall into one of the following categories: Counseling Outcome Research: Treatment efficacy and effectiveness of mental health, school, addictions, rehabilitation, family, and college counseling interventions across the lifespan as reported in clinical trials, single-case research designs, single-group designs, and multi- or mixed-method designs.