教师养老金改革必须考虑成本和设计

IF 2 3区教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH

Australian Educational Researcher Pub Date : 2023-02-17 DOI:10.3102/0013189x221111388

Andrew J. Rotherham

引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇评论讨论了关于教师退休金的争论是如何建立在对教师慷慨福利的想法上的，以及这些福利是否值得，而实际上，大多数教师都处于退休制度的不利地位，这一制度的归属期很长，可移植性有限。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Teacher Pension Reform Must Be About Cost and Design

This commentary discusses how the teacher pension debate is often predicated on the idea of generous benefits for teachers and whether those are deserved, when in practice most teachers are disadvantaged by a retirement system with long vesting periods and limited portability.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Australian Educational Researcher EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-

CiteScore

4.60

自引率

14.30%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Australian Educational Researcher is the international, peer reviewed journal published by AARE. The Australian Educational Researcher is published three times a year and is a Thomson (ISI) indexed journal. The aim of AER is to:Promote understandings of educational issues through the publication of original research and scholarly essays.Inform education policy through the publication of papers utilising a range of research methodologies and addressing issues of theory and practice.Provide a research forum for education researchers to debate current problems and issues.Provide an international and national perspective on education research through the publication of book reviews, scholarly essays, original quantitative and qualitative research and papers that are methodologically or theoretically innovative.AER welcomes contributions from a variety of disciplinary perspectives on any level of education.