广场奇观:对鲁本·范·温格登的回应

IF 0.5 2区哲学 0 RELIGION

New Testament Studies Pub Date : 2022-12-06 DOI:10.1017/S0028688522000297

J. Cook

{"title":"广场奇观:对鲁本·范·温格登的回应","authors":"J. Cook","doi":"10.1017/S0028688522000297","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Ruben van Wingerden's articles on carrying a patibulum and σταυρός are admirably precise. However, his analyses of two texts of Plautus and a fragment of Clodius Licinus are problematic. In contrast to van Wingerden's rather minimalistic conclusions regarding carrying a patibulum or σταυρός, it seems likely that carrying a patibulum was a general element in Roman practice in accounts in which patibula are mentioned in conjunction with crucifixions – even when there is no explicit reference to carrying the patibulum through the streets.","PeriodicalId":19280,"journal":{"name":"New Testament Studies","volume":"46 1","pages":"76 - 94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Spectacle of the Patibulum: A Response to Ruben van Wingerden\",\"authors\":\"J. Cook\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0028688522000297\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Ruben van Wingerden's articles on carrying a patibulum and σταυρός are admirably precise. However, his analyses of two texts of Plautus and a fragment of Clodius Licinus are problematic. In contrast to van Wingerden's rather minimalistic conclusions regarding carrying a patibulum or σταυρός, it seems likely that carrying a patibulum was a general element in Roman practice in accounts in which patibula are mentioned in conjunction with crucifixions – even when there is no explicit reference to carrying the patibulum through the streets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19280,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"New Testament Studies\",\"volume\":\"46 1\",\"pages\":\"76 - 94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"New Testament Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688522000297\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"RELIGION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Testament Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0028688522000297","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

鲁本·范·温格登关于携带宝盆和στα - ν ς的文章非常精确。然而，他对普劳图斯的两篇文本和克罗迪乌斯·利西努斯的片段的分析是有问题的。与van Wingerden关于携带天坛或στα α ο ς的相当简约的结论相反，携带天坛似乎是罗马实践中的一个普遍因素，在这些记载中，天坛与十字架一起被提到-即使没有明确提到携带天坛穿过街道。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Spectacle of the Patibulum: A Response to Ruben van Wingerden

Abstract Ruben van Wingerden's articles on carrying a patibulum and σταυρός are admirably precise. However, his analyses of two texts of Plautus and a fragment of Clodius Licinus are problematic. In contrast to van Wingerden's rather minimalistic conclusions regarding carrying a patibulum or σταυρός, it seems likely that carrying a patibulum was a general element in Roman practice in accounts in which patibula are mentioned in conjunction with crucifixions – even when there is no explicit reference to carrying the patibulum through the streets.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

New Testament Studies RELIGION-

CiteScore

0.80

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Testament Studies is an international peer-reviewed periodical whose contributors include the leading New Testament scholars writing in the world today. The journal publishes original articles and short studies in English, French and German on a wide range of issues pertaining to the origins, history, context and theology of the New Testament and early Christianity. All contributions represent research at the cutting edge of the discipline, which has developed a wide range of methods. The journal welcomes submissions employing any such methods in recent years. The periodical embraces exegetical, historical, literary-critical, sociological, theological and other approaches to the New Testament, including studies in its history of interpretation and effects.