二甲基硅氧烷与共生方法在婴幼儿绞痛治疗中的疗效

Behzad Barekatian, R. Kelishadi, Farinaz Sohrabi, M. Yazdi
{"title":"二甲基硅氧烷与共生方法在婴幼儿绞痛治疗中的疗效","authors":"Behzad Barekatian, R. Kelishadi, Farinaz Sohrabi, M. Yazdi","doi":"10.22038/IJN.2021.52504.1940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Infantile colic (IC) (a frequent reason for infantile referral to pediatricians) is a common indiscoverable problem posing concerns for parents. Varieties of theories for the etiology of IC have been raised, and different therapeutic approaches have been recommended in this regard. This study aimed to assess and compare the efficiency of dimethicone versus symbiotic in the treatment of IC. \nMethods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 149 infants with the diagnosis of IC based on the Wessel criteria from 2017 to 2018. The study population was randomly divided into two groups of Dimethicone (n=73) (five drops of dimethicone, three times a day for three weeks) and Symbiotic (n=76) (five daily drops of symbiotic for three weeks). Utilized symbiotic contained fructooligosacharide periodic and probiotic of 109CFU of Bifidobacterium lactis. Duration of an infant crying per day, numbers of crying per day, sleep duration per day, and number of defecation per day were obtained prior to the study and at the end of each week. \nResults: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, and values of breastfeeding (P>0.05). Crying duration, numbers of crying, and sleep duration per day improved significantly in the dimethicone group (P 0.05). \nConclusion: The findings of the current study presented that dimethicone and symbiotic could successfully improve IC symptoms regarding crying times, as well as the duration and sleeping time per day. Comparison of these two remedies for IC treatment revealed no significant differences.","PeriodicalId":14584,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","volume":"31 1","pages":"25-31"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficiency of Dimethicone and Symbiotic Approaches in Infantile Colic Management\",\"authors\":\"Behzad Barekatian, R. Kelishadi, Farinaz Sohrabi, M. Yazdi\",\"doi\":\"10.22038/IJN.2021.52504.1940\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Infantile colic (IC) (a frequent reason for infantile referral to pediatricians) is a common indiscoverable problem posing concerns for parents. Varieties of theories for the etiology of IC have been raised, and different therapeutic approaches have been recommended in this regard. This study aimed to assess and compare the efficiency of dimethicone versus symbiotic in the treatment of IC. \\nMethods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 149 infants with the diagnosis of IC based on the Wessel criteria from 2017 to 2018. The study population was randomly divided into two groups of Dimethicone (n=73) (five drops of dimethicone, three times a day for three weeks) and Symbiotic (n=76) (five daily drops of symbiotic for three weeks). Utilized symbiotic contained fructooligosacharide periodic and probiotic of 109CFU of Bifidobacterium lactis. Duration of an infant crying per day, numbers of crying per day, sleep duration per day, and number of defecation per day were obtained prior to the study and at the end of each week. \\nResults: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, and values of breastfeeding (P>0.05). Crying duration, numbers of crying, and sleep duration per day improved significantly in the dimethicone group (P 0.05). \\nConclusion: The findings of the current study presented that dimethicone and symbiotic could successfully improve IC symptoms regarding crying times, as well as the duration and sleeping time per day. Comparison of these two remedies for IC treatment revealed no significant differences.\",\"PeriodicalId\":14584,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"25-31\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2021.52504.1940\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Neonatology IJN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJN.2021.52504.1940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:婴儿绞痛(IC)(一个常见的原因,婴儿转诊到儿科医生)是一个常见的难以发现的问题,引起家长的关注。关于IC的病因已经提出了各种各样的理论,并在这方面推荐了不同的治疗方法。本研究旨在评估和比较二甲基硅氧烷与共生生物治疗IC的疗效。方法:2017 - 2018年根据Wessel标准诊断为IC的149例婴儿进行随机临床试验。研究人群随机分为二甲基硅氧烷组(n=73)(五滴二甲基硅氧烷,每天三次,持续三周)和共生组(n=76)(每天五滴共生,持续三周)。利用了含低聚果糖的乳酸双歧杆菌和益生菌109CFU的共生菌。在研究开始前和每周结束时,研究人员获得了婴儿每天哭泣的持续时间、每天哭泣的次数、每天睡眠的持续时间和每天排便的次数。结果:两组间年龄、性别、母乳喂养值差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。二甲基硅氧烷组患儿每天哭泣时间、哭泣次数、睡眠时间均显著改善(P < 0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,二甲基硅氧烷和共生体可以成功改善IC症状,包括哭泣次数,每天的持续时间和睡眠时间。比较这两种治疗IC的方法没有显着差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficiency of Dimethicone and Symbiotic Approaches in Infantile Colic Management
Background: Infantile colic (IC) (a frequent reason for infantile referral to pediatricians) is a common indiscoverable problem posing concerns for parents. Varieties of theories for the etiology of IC have been raised, and different therapeutic approaches have been recommended in this regard. This study aimed to assess and compare the efficiency of dimethicone versus symbiotic in the treatment of IC. Methods: This randomized clinical trial was conducted on 149 infants with the diagnosis of IC based on the Wessel criteria from 2017 to 2018. The study population was randomly divided into two groups of Dimethicone (n=73) (five drops of dimethicone, three times a day for three weeks) and Symbiotic (n=76) (five daily drops of symbiotic for three weeks). Utilized symbiotic contained fructooligosacharide periodic and probiotic of 109CFU of Bifidobacterium lactis. Duration of an infant crying per day, numbers of crying per day, sleep duration per day, and number of defecation per day were obtained prior to the study and at the end of each week. Results: There was no statistically significant difference between the groups regarding age, gender, and values of breastfeeding (P>0.05). Crying duration, numbers of crying, and sleep duration per day improved significantly in the dimethicone group (P 0.05). Conclusion: The findings of the current study presented that dimethicone and symbiotic could successfully improve IC symptoms regarding crying times, as well as the duration and sleeping time per day. Comparison of these two remedies for IC treatment revealed no significant differences.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信